The Creation of Contemporary Batik Motif Retak Seribu as an Innovation of the Remekan Technique for Traditional Batik Motifs

Basuki Sumartono, Adam Wahida

Abstract

Batik is one of the identities of Indonesian cultural products that is well known by the world community. Research on batik never runs out to be studied. The point of view of the study can be done from various disciplines. Although in terms of motifs, it has been researched many times, and it is possible to identify that the number of batik motifs in Indonesia can reach thousands of existing motifs, from traditional motifs to modern motifs. Kenneth F. Bates (in Riyanto, et al 1997: 15) reveals that what forms a physical motif are the spot elements (in the form of strokes, colors, textures) line (lines) and mass (mass / in the form of Figures) in a single unit. Then the motif is duplicated or given variations with repetition to form a pattern or field. In contrast to Adi Kusrianto (2013: 3) states that classical batik motifs have meaning for the Javanese. Classical batik ornaments must also be able to give birth to a harmonious sense of beauty between the composition of the color scheme and the arrangement of the ornaments. Greg Richards and Julie Wilson wrote that innovation is the introduction of new inventions or spreading the meaning of these new inventions into general use in society (Richards and Wilson, 2007: 6). This study aims to develop the technique and manufacture of retak seribu motifs originating from the remekan batik technique, the consideration being to simplify the manufacturing process and enrich the development of contemporary batik motifs in Indonesia. Thus, this research will use researchbased development with the following steps: 1) information collecting, 2) develop a preliminary form of product, 3) preliminary product testing, 4) main product revision, 5) main field testing, and 6) dissemination.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Suharsimi, A. (1991). Prosedur Penelitian. Suatu Pendekatan Praktik. PT. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Bastomi, S. (2012). Estetika kriya kontemporer dan kritiknya. Semarang: UNNES Press.

Bernard, Russel H. (1994). Reseach Methods in Antropology Qualitative and Quantitative Approach. USA: Sage Publication.Inc.

Borg, Walter R and Gall, Meredith D. (2003). Educational Research: An Introduction (7th Edition). Boston: Pearson Education.

Bogdan & Tylor. (1982). Kualitatif Dasar-dasar Penelitian. A Khozim Affandi (Translator). Surabaya:Usaha Nasional.

Budi, S. (2017). Enam Motif Batik Klasik dan Satu Lurik dalam Sistem Nilai Ritual Mitoni Masyarakat Surakarta. Dissertation Summary. Yogyakarta: PPS ISI.

Fraser Lu, S. (1985). Indonesian Batik: Processes, Patern, and Place. Singapore: Oxfort University.

Haryanto. (2015). Seni Rupa Kontemporer di Yogyakarta Sejak Tahun 1975 Hingga 2010: Identitas dan Perubahan. Dissertation Summary. Yogyakarta: Sekolah Pascasarjana UGM.

Irianto, Asmudjo J. (2005) Ruang Urban di Indonesia dan Seni rupa Kontemporer dalam CP Biennale 2005: Urban/Culture, Jakarta.

Lenzi, L. (2007) Visi Prismatis: Genalogi Konde yang Masih Terus Berkembang Dalam Seni Rupa Nindityo Adipurnomo. Yogyakarta: Rumah Seni Cemeti.

Lincoln Y and Guba, E.G. (1985). Naturalistic Inquiry. Beverly Hill: Sage Publications.

Nairne, S. (1999) Exhibition of Contemporary Art dalam Contemporary Culture of Display (ed) Emma Baker, New Heaven: Yale University.

Nasution. (1988). Metode Penelitian Naturalistik Kualitatif. Bandung: Transito.

Pelto, P. J. & Gretel H. P. (1987). Antropologycal Reaseach: The Structur of Inquiry. London: Cambridge University Press.

Spradley, J. (1980). Participan observation. New York; Holt, Rinehart and Winston.

Sugiharto, I. B. (2016). Seni dan Paradigma Abad 21. Articles in Discussion ARTJOG. Yogyakarta.

Susanto, M. (2002). Diksi Seni Rupa. Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Sustiawati, N. L. (2009). Seni Sebagai Pemberi Identitas Dalam Upaya Meningkatkan Daya Saing Bangsa. Articles in Semiloka Nasional Pengembangan Karakter Bangsa. Bandung: Universitas Widyatama.

Supangkat, J. (2001). Entang Wiharso: Nusa Amuk. Jakarta: Nadi Gallery.

Tabrani, P. (1999). Menggali Konsep Kriya Tradisi Untuk Keunggulan Seni Rupa Indonesia Masa Depan. Articles in the conference of Kriya dan Rekayasa. Bandung: Institut Tekhnologi Bandung.

Torwesten, H. (1991). Vedanta: Heart of Hinduism. New York: Grove Press.

Wahida, A. (2010). Bertolak dari Tradisi Menuju Eksistensi. Articles in Proceedings of Seminar Nasional Art Educare#2. Surakarta: PSR FKIP UNS

____________. (2013).Pengembangan Materi Pendidikan Karakter Berbasis Budaya Lokal Dalam Pembelajaran Seni Rupa SMA Di Surakarta. Research report Competitive Grants DIKTI.

____________. (2015). Pengembangan Sentra Industri Keramik Berbasis Kearifan Lokal. Research report Grants MRG UNS

____________. (2016). Empowerment of The Crafters of Traditional Ceramic Through Development of Design Based Local Wisdom. Proceeding 2nd International Conference on Creative Media, Design, and Technology REKA.

Richars, G., Julie W. (2007). Tourism, Creativity, and Development. London: Routledge.

Sumber Online:

http://journal.unnes.ac.id/sju/index.php/jih

https://lifestyle.sindonews.com/read/970634/166/priscilla-saputro

sulap-batik-banyuwangi-jadi-modern-1425254377. (19-Januari 2020)

(https://www.harpersbazaar.co.id/articles/read/1/2019/6300/5-Desainer-Etnik-Indonesia-untuk-Tampilan-Sehari-hari)

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.