Critical Multiliteration Model Based on Project Based Learning Approach in Developing Basic School of Metacognition Thinking Skills

Ani Hendriyani, Etty Rohayati, Ernalis Ernalis, Yusuf Tri Herlambang

Abstract

The problem is the low ability of students, and the low orientation of developing students' thinking skills in learning, especially the thinking skills metacognition which is the thinking of the 21st century skills. These factors are one of the main factors that are still oriented towards achieving knowledge in a partial-textual way and not an integrative contextual understanding of the knowledge learned. Therefore, there are efforts that can be used to resolve the problem through effective and up-to-date effective models that are effort-oriented in improving students' metacognitive thinking skills, which is through the application of critical literacy models based on project based learning approaches. The critical multiliteration model is a learning model developed based on awareness and recognition of cultural perspectives and the diversity of learning styles. In addition, the critical multiliteration model is a model that is oriented towards efforts to build students' thinking skills through multicontext, multicultural and multimedia approaches. In this context, critical multiliteration models are specifically developed as a dynamic learning approach, where students actively explore problems in real world, provide challenges, and gain deeper knowledge. This is based on the purpose of developing a model oriented to the development of metacognitive thinking skills.

Keywords

Multiliteration; Project Based Learning Approach; Metacognition

Full Text:

PDF

References

Herlambang, Y T, (2018). Pedagogik: Telaah Kritis Ilmu Pendidikan Dalam Multiperspektif. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Freire, P. (2005). Education for Critical Consciousness. London: Continuum.

Tilaar, H.A.R. (2012). Perubahan Sosial dan Pendidikan: Model Transformatif untuk Indonesia. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Tilaar, H.A.R. (2009). Kekuasaan dan Pendidikan: Manajemen Pendidikan Nasional Dalam Pusaran Kekuasaan. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Morocco, C.C., et al. (2008). Supported Literacy for Adolescents: Transforming Teaching and Content Learning for The Twenty-First Century. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Trilling, B. & Fadel, C. (2009). 21st Century Skills: Learning for Life in Our

Times. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass A Wiley Imprint.

Binkley, M., et al. (2012) “Defining Twenty-First Century Skills” dalam Assessment and Teaching of 21st Century Skills. New York: Springer.

OECD (2003) Literacy Skills for the World of Tomorrow: Further Results from PISA 2000. Canada: OECD.

OECD (2004) Learning for Tomorrow’s World: First Results from PISA 2003. Canada: OECD.

OECD (2007) PISA 2006: Sciences Competecies for Tomorrow’s World Volume 1 Analysis. Canada: OECD.

OECD (2010) PISA 2009 Results: What Students Know and Can Do Volume I. Canada: OECD.

OECD (2013). PISA 2012 Results: What Students Know and Can Do Volume I. Canada: OECD.

Lucas, G. (2015). Project Based Learning vs. Problem-Based Learning vs. X-BL [Online]. Diakses dari http://www.edutopia.org/Project-Based Learning vs. Problem-Based Learning vs. X-BL_edutopia.html.

Johnson, L., & Lamb, A. (2007). Project, Problem, and Inquiry-Based Learning. [Online]. Diakses dari http://eduscape.com/tap/topic43.htm

Abidin, Y., Mulyati, T., Yunansah, H. (2015). Pembelajaran Literasi dalam konteks Pendidikan Multiterasi Integratif, dan Berdiferensiasi. Bandung: Rizqy Press.

Ivanic, R. (2009). “Bringing Literacy Studies into Research and Prospects” dalam The Future of Literacy Studies. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.

Cope, B. dan Kalantzis, M. (2005). Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and the Design of Social Futures. New York: Routledge.

Iyer, R. & Luke, C. (2010). Multimodal, Multiliteracies: Texts and Literacies for the 21st Century. dalam Pullen & Cole (Eds.). Multiliteracies and Technology Enhanced Education: Social Practice and the Global Classroom. New York: Information Science Reference (an imprint of IGI Global).

The New London Group (2005). A Pedagogy of Multiliteracies: Designing Social Futures. In B. Cope and M. Kalantzis (eds) Multiliteracies: Literacy Learning and The Design of Social Futures (pp. 9-38). South Yarra, VIC: Macmillan.

Lickona, T. (2004). Character Matters. New York: A Touchstone Book.

Abidin, Y. (2016). Revitalisasi Penilaian Pembelajaran: dalam Konteks Pendidikan Multilterasi Abad ke-21. Bandung: Refika Aditama.

Zohar, A. & Dori, Y.J. (eds.) (2012). Metacognition in Science Education: Trends in Current Research. NewYork: Springer.

Metcalfe, J & shimamura, Ap. (1994). Metacognition: Knowledge About Knowing. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.

Anderson, L, W. & Krathwohl, D, R. (2014). Kerangka landasan untuk pembelajaran, pengajaran dan asesmen. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Wells, A. (2001). Emotional disorder and metacognition: innovative cognitive therapy. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.

Wells, A. (2009). Metacognition Therapy For Anxiety and Depression. New York, NY: The Guildford Press.

Vandergrift, L. & Goh, C.C. (2012). Teaching and Learning Secobd language Listening: Metacognition in Action. New York: Routledge.

Larkin, S. (2010). Metacognition in young Children. New York: Oxford University Press.

Quirk, M. (2006). Intuition and Metagonition In Medical Education: Keys To Developing Expertise. New York, NY: Springer Publishing Company, Inc.

Schneider, W. (2010). Metacognition, Strategy Use & Instruction. Dalam H. S. Waters & W. Schneider (eds.), Metacognition and Memory Development In Childhood and Adolescence (pp. 54-81). New York: The Guilford Press.

Flavell, J. (1979). Metacognition and Cognitive Monitoring: A New area cognitiveDevelopment Inquiry. (906-911. American Psychologist.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijsascs.v3i1.34897

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.