The changing of oral argumentation process of grade XI students through Socratic dialogue

I W Pangestika, M Ramli, Nurmiyati Nurmiyati


Arguments are one of the important purposes in the modern era of learning because it is the basic step to promote student’s critical thinking process and science literacy. Argumentation process can be trained through interactive dialogue that provides opportunities for students to argue. This research aims to change oral argumentation process in biology class of high school through the application of the Socratic Dialogue. The participants were students of grade XI science in one high school located in Surakarta, selected purposively. A classroom action research was done collaboratively between student teacher, lecturers, and teacher, follow the spiral cycles of research by Stephen Kemmis. During the implementation of research, the audio recorder has prepared to record the dialogue and arguments of the students. Next, data recorded that was converted to a dialogue transcript analyzed qualitatively using the Toulmin Argumentation Patterns (TAP). Another data source is teacher’s reflective diaries that contained notes during the learning process. The result shows that student’s oral argumentation process found were only claiming supported by weak warrants. Implementation of the Socratic Dialogue brings positive changes in oral argumentation process of the students, proven by the complete argumentation pattern include claims, data, warrants, backings, and rebuttals at the end of the research cycle. A classroom action research which is developed collaboratively and implement interactive dialogue also inquiry learning is highly recommended to change student’s oral argumentation process.

Full Text:



Erduran S, Ardac D, and Yakmaci-Guzel B 2006 Eurasia Journal of Mathematics,Science, and Technology Education Learning to Teach argumentation: case studies of pre-service secondary science teachers 2 2

Javier F, Ortega R., Eugenio O, and Alzate T 2015 Educ. Pesqui., São Paulo A model for teaching argumentation in science class 41 3 629-643

Bricker L A and Bell P 2008 Science Education Conceptualizations of argumentation from science studies and the learning sciences and their implications for the practices of science education 92 3 473-498

Stylinger M E and Overstreet J 2014 Voices from the Middle Strengthening argumentative writing with speaking and listening (socratic) circles 22 158-62

Knezic D, Wubbels T, Elbers E, and Hajer M 2010 Teaching and Teacher Education The socratic dialogue in teacher education 26 4 1104-1111

Wortel E and Verweij D 2008 Practical Philosophy Inquiry, criticism and reasonableness: socratic dialogue as a research method? 9 2 54–72

Knezic D, Elbers E, Wubbels T, and Hajer M 2013 The Modern Language Journal Teacher’s Education in Socratic Dialogue: Some effects on teacher – learner interaction 97 2 490–505 DOI: 10.1111/j. 1540–4781.2013.12014.x

Nurjannah A dan Suprapto N 2014 Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika (JIPF) Pengaruh penerapan pembelajaran socrates terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis dalam pembelajaran fisika pada materi hukum Newton 3 2 20-26

Tippett C 2009 Journal of Elementary Science Education Argumentation: the language of science 21 1 17-25

McNeill K L 2014 Journal of Research in Science Teaching Elementary Student’s views of explanation, argumentation, and evidence, and their abilities to construct arguments 48 793-823

Ramli M, Rakhmawati E, Hendarto P, and Winarni 2017Journal of Physics: Conf. Series Process of argumentation in high school biology class: a qualitative analysis 812 1-7 (doi:10.1088/1742-6596/812/1/012007)

Aufschnaiter C. Von, Erduran S, Osborne J, and Simon S 2008 Journal of Research in Science Teaching Arguing to learn and learning to argue: case studies of how students’ argumentation relates to their scientific knowledge 1-4 DOI: 10.1002/tea.20213.

Osborne J 2010 Science Arguing to learn in science: the role of collaborative, critical discourse 328 463-466 DOI: 10.1126/science.1183944

Heng L L 2014 International Education Studies Individual versus group argumentation: student’s performance in a malaysian context. 7 7 109-124

Lee H S, Pallant A, Pryputniewicz S, and Liu O L 2013 Paper Presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, Rio Grande, Puerto Rico Measuring students’ scientific argumentation associated with uncertain current science 1-47

Kemmis S, McTaggart R, and Nixon R 2014 The Action Research Planner (ISBN 978-9) (Singapore: Springer)

Pritasari A C, Dwiastuti S, and Probosari R M 2016 Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi Peningkatan kemampuan argumentasi melalui penerapan model problem based learning pada siswa kelas X MIA 1 SMA Batik 2 Surakarta tahun pelajaran 2014/2015 8 1-7

Berland L K and Hammer D 2012 Journal of Research in Science Teaching Framing for scientific argumentation 49 1 68-94

Kuhn D and Udell W 2007 Psychology Press Coordinating own and other perspectives in argument 13 2 90-104

Bathgate M, Crowell A, Schunn C and Dorph R 2015 International Journal of Science Education The learning benefits of being willing and able to engage in scientific argumentation 37-41


  • There are currently no refbacks.