Analysis of students' difficulties on the material elasticity and harmonic oscillation in the inquiry-based physics learning in senior high school

Halimatus Sa’diyah, Sarwanto Sarwanto, Sukarmin Sukarmin

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze of students' difficulties on the material elasticity and harmonic oscillation in the inquiry-based physics learning. It has eight stages. They are the orientation, the problem formulation, the formulation of hypotheses, the data obtaining, the testing hypotheses, conclusions, the implementation of the conclusions and generalizations, and the reflection stage. This research determines the student's learning difficulties on the each stage. The subject of this research is all of the students in X IPA 4 SMA N Sambungmacan Sragen. The amount of this research subject is thirty students. The method used in this research is descriptive qualitative. The data acquired with the learning process observation, the student's response questionnaire, and the student's cognitive tests. The results show that the student has difficulty in analyzing the elasticity and the force of deviation, speed, and acceleration concept, illustrates hooke law, and the matter's modulus elasticity. The difficult stages of the inquiry-based physics learning are the problem formulation, the formulation of hypotheses, the data obtaining, the testing hypotheses, conclusions, the implementation of the conclusions and generalizations, and the reflection stage.

Keywords

students’ difficulties, elasticity and harmonic oscillation, inquiry

Full Text:

PDF

References

Hidayat, T 2017 Menggairahkan Pembelajaran Taksonomi Di Kelas Menggunakan Metode Fenetik. Retrieved: 20 Juni 2017

Miller J D, Scott E C, and Okamoto S 2006 Science. 313 765-766

Lovely E C, and Kendrick L C 2008 Integrative and Comparative Biology. 48 164-174

Gibson and Hoefnagels 2015 Evolution: Education and Outreach. 8 15

Kummer T A 2017 Assessing and Improving Student Understanding of Tree- Thinking (Ph.D. dissertation) USA: Brigham Young University

Philips C B, Novick L R., Catley K M., Funk D J 2012 Evolution: Education and Outreach. 5 595-602

Baum D A and Smith S D 2013 Tree Thinking An Introduction to Phylogenetic Biology ‘ Ed Michael Ziegler’ the United States: Roberts and Company Publishers, Inc 2

Novick L R., Stull A T, Catley K M 2012 Bioscience 62 757-764

Walter E M, Halverson K M, Boyce C J 2013 Evolution: Education and Outreach 6 26

Naegle E 2009 Patterns of thinking about phylogenetic trees: A study of student learning and the potential of tree-thinking to improve comprehension of biological concepts (Ph.D. dissertation) Pocatello, ID: Idaho State University

Catley K M, Phillips B C, and Novick L R 2013 Research in Science Education 43 2327–2348

Carr S M 2012 Concepts of monopoly, polyphyly, & paraphyly Retrieved: 20 Juni 2017

Eddy S L, Crowe A J, Wenderoth M P, and Freeman S 2013 Evolution: Education and Outreach 1 13

Olson S, Rapporteur, Laov J 2012 Thinking Evolutionarily: Evolution Education Across the Life Sciences: Summary of a Convocation Washington (DC): National Academies Press (US)

Smith J J, Cheruvelil K S, Uvenhine S A 2013 CBE—Life Sciences Education 12 542–552

Meisel R P 2011 Evol Educ Outreach 3 621–628

Meir E, Perry J, Herron J, Kingsolver J 2007 Am Biol Teach 69 71–76

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.