Stimulating Students’ Argumentation using Drawing – based Modeling on The Concept of Ecosystem

E N Sumarni, A Widodo, R Solihat

Abstract

Drawing – based modeling as learning approach, it allows students to create models based on drawing which help them to run a simulation. Students can use drawing–based modeling to learn a pair of interacting population known as predato–prey system while they usually conducted practicum using diagram of organisms. This study was to explore students’ argumentation and students’ understanding on the concept of the ecosystem. The study was conducted quasi – experimental using the matching – only post-test – only control group design. The participants consist of 60 grade 10 senior high school students in Subang, West Java. They are placed into two groups, 30 students in the experimental group and 30 students in the control group. Data was collected through argumentation test and selected response test for assessing students’ understanding. Students’ argumentation were analyzed using Toulmin’s argumentation pattern and statistical analysis. The result showed there is no significant difference between the experimental group and the control group for students’ argumentation. Most of the students are predominantly at level 2. But the coherency of arguments of the experimental group is more coherent than the control group. It means that the students in experimental group can make logical claim and supported by the correct and relevant grounds (data, warrant, and backing). The result of students’ understanding showed there is a significant mean score between the experimental group and the control group whether 72.33 for the experimental group and 62.13 for the control group

Keywords

students’ argumentation, drawing-based modeling, ecosystem

Full Text:

PDF

References

Widodo, A., Waldrip, B & Herawati, D. 2016 Indonesian Journal of Science Education 5 199

Minarti & Hayat. 2015 International Conference on Mathematics Science and Education 85

Inch, E. S., Warnick, B & Endres, D. 2006 Critical Thinking and Communication. USA: Pearson

Erduran, S., & Maria, PJ., 2008 Argumentation in Science Education, London: Springer

Pritasari, Dwiastuti, & Sajidan. 2015 Indonesian Journal of Science Education 4(2) 158

Bollen, L., & van Joolingen, W. R 2013 IEEE Transactions on Learning Technologies 1 1939

Fraenkel, Wallen, & Hyun. 2012 How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. New York: The McGraw-Hill Companies

Choi, A., Notebaert, A.,Diaz, J., & Hand, B. 2010 Research in Science Education 40(2) 149

Herawati, Desti. 2015. Penalaran Ilmiah (Scientific Reasoning) Siswa Sekolah Berorientasi Lingkungan dan Sekolah Multinational. (Tesis, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia)

Sampson, V. & Gleim, L 2009 American Biology Teacher 71(8) 465

Heijnes, Dewi. 2015 Research Project (45 ECTS) of Science Education and Communication. Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht University

Schouten, J.H.Y. 2016 Research Project (45 ECTS) of Science Education and Communication. Freudenthal Institute for Science and Mathematics Education, Utrecht University

Acar, O & Patton, B.R. 2012 Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences 46 4756

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.