Access to, Use, and Effect of Open Educational Resources: The Perspectives of LIS Academics in Selected Nigerian Universities

Adeyinka TELLA, Olufemi Peter Owoeye, Aderinola Ololade Dunmade

Abstract

This study investigated access to, use of, and the effect of Open Educational Resources (OER) on LIS academics in Nigeria. The study adopted a purely quantitative method, using a survey as the research design. The population of the study comprised LIS academic staff in Nigerian universities. Through a total enumeration method, a sample of 140 LIS academics from 15 universities in Nigeria was selected. A questionnaire developed for data collection was administered to the 140 respondents, of which 133 copies were returned. Seven objectives were developed to guide the study. The results demonstrated that office documents such as Word and PowerPoint, open textbooks, lecture notes, quizzes and tutorials, MOOCs, learning modules, and open courseware are the OER resources most frequently accessed by LIS academics. Mobile phones and laptop computers are the primary devices used by LIS academics for accessing OER. OER are used by LIS academics for teaching and learning, research, preparation for workshops, seminars, conference presentations, and class notes. The effects of OER on LIS academics include the ability to use materials created by other colleagues and customise course materials to create an ideal course packet or textbook. Policies guiding the use of OER include equal access, protection of intellectual property rights, and open licences such as Creative Commons. The challenges LIS academics encounter when using OER include frequent power outages, untimely updates of OER repositories, and prolonged periods spent searching for resources in institutional repositories.

Keywords

Access and Use, Library and Information Science, LIS Academic Staff, Nigeria. Open Educational Resources, Open Education.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2014). Opening the curriculum: Open educational resources in US. Babson Survey Research Group.

Almobarraz, A. (2007). Perceived attributes of diffusion of innovation theory as predictors of internet adoption among the faculty members of Imam Mohammed bin Saud University (PhD thesis, University of North Texas, USA). University of North Texas Digital Library. http://digital.library.unt.edu/ark:/67531/metadc3710/

Anderson, T., Gaines, A., Leachman, C., & Williamson, E. P. (2017). Faculty and instructor perceptions of open educational resources in engineering. The Reference Librarian, 58(4), 257-277. https://doi.org/10.1080/02763877.2017.1355768

Ani, O. E., Ngulube, P., & Onyancha, B. (2015). Perceived effect of accessibility and utilization of electronic resources on productivity of academic staff in selected Nigerian universities. SAGE Open, 5(1), 1-7. https://doi.org/10.1177/2158244015571480

Atkins, D. E., Brown, J. S., & Hammond, A. L. (2007). A review of the open educational resources (OER) movement: Achievements, challenges and new opportunities. http://tinyurl.com/

Bliss, T., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Thanos, K. (2013). College student and faculty perceptions of the cost and quality of open textbooks. First Monday, 18(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v18i1.3972

Butcher, N. (2015). A basic guide to open educational resources (OER). United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization. https://doi.org/10.56059/11599/36

Butcher, N., & Hoosen, S. (2012). Exploring the business case for open educational resources. Commonwealth of Learning. https://oasis.col.org/items/df93f89e-4697-40a1-886f-49403f6ca232

Cascio, W., & Montealegre, R. (2016). How technology is changing work and organizations. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 3(1), 349-375. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-041015-062352

Caswell, T., Henson, S., Jensen, M., & Wiley, D. (2008). Open content and open educational resources: Enabling universal education. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 9(1). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v9i1.469

Commonwealth of Learning. (2017). Open educational resources: From commitment to action. COL.

Costa, S., & Meadows, J. (2000). The impact of computer usage on scholarly communication among social scientists. Journal of Information Science, 26(4), 255-262. https://doi.org/10.1177/016555150002600406

Creswell, J. W., & Poth, C. N. (2018). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (4th ed.). Sage.

Dhanarajan, G., & Abeywardena, I. S. (2013). Higher education and open educational resources in Asia: An overview. In G. Dhanarajan & D. Porter (Eds.), Open education resources: An Asian perspective (pp. 3-18). Commonwealth of Learning.

Ememe, P. I., & Modebelu, O. J. (2019). Challenges of accessibility and utilization of open education resources (OER) in single and dual mode open education (ODE) institutions in Lagos. International Journal of Educational Research, 6(1), 112-126.

European Commission on Lifelong Learning Programme. (2013). Open educational resources. https://unevoc.unesco.org/home/TVETipedia+Glossary/filt=all/id=576

Goodwin, M. A. L. (2011). The open course library: Using open educational resources to improve community college access (Doctoral thesis, Washington State University, USA).

Guo, Y., Zhang, M., Bonk, C. J., & Li, Y. (2015). Chinese faculty members’ open educational resources (OER) usage status and the barriers to OER development and usage. International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 10(5). https://doi.org/10.3991/ijet.v10i5.4819

Hakim, S. (2017). Supporting access to open education resources and massive open online courses for high school students of New Zealand. E-Learning and Digital Media, 14(4), 244-253. https://doi.org/10.1177/2042753017692724

Harley, D., Lawrence, S., Acord, S. K., & Dixson, J. (2010). Affordable and open textbooks: An exploratory study of faculty attitudes. California Journal of Politics and Policy, 2(1), 1-35. https://doi.org/10.5070/P2D60T

Hayman, J. (2018). Open is an invitation: Exploring the use of open educational resources with Ontario post-secondary educators (Doctoral thesis, Arizona State University, USA).

Hoosen, S., & Butcher, N. (2019). Understanding the impact of OER: Achievements and challenges. UNESCO IITE.

Hylén, J. (2006). Open educational resources: Opportunities and challenges. OECD. https://www.oecd.org/education/ceri/37351085.pdf

Inegbedion, J. O., & Opateye, A. J. (2018). Open educational resources’ adaptability and institutional support for lecturers of open and distance education universities in Nigeria. Pakistan Journal of Educational Research and Evaluation, 4(1), 21-32.

Kahle, D. (2008). Designing open educational technology. In J. S. Brown (Ed.), Opening up education: The collective advancement of education through open technology, open content, and open knowledge (pp. 27-45). MIT Press.

Kimmons, R. (2015). OER quality and adaptation in K-12: Comparing teacher evaluations of copyright-restricted, open, and open/adapted textbooks. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 16(5). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i5.2341

Mahajan, P. (2006). Internet use by researchers: A study of Punjab University, Chandigarh. Library Philosophy and Practice, 8(2). http://www.webpages.uidaho.edu/~mbolin/mahajan2.htm

Martin, M., Belikov, O., Hilton, J., Wiley, D., & Fischer, L. (2017). Analysis of student and faculty perceptions of textbook costs in higher education. Open Praxis, 9(1), 79-91. https://doi.org/10.5944/openpraxis.9.1.432

McKerlich, R., Ives, C., & McGreal, R. (2013). Measuring use and creation of open educational resources in higher education. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 14(4). https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v14i4.1573

Miracle, N. (2020). An assessment of open educational resources by students in selected academic institutions in Southwest, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4356

Njeze, M. (2020). An assessment of open educational resources by students in selected academic institutions in Southwest, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4356

Onaifo, D. (2016). Alternative academy: Investigating the use of open educational resources by learners at the University of Lagos (Electronic Thesis and Dissertation Repository, 4086). https://ir.lib.uwo.ca/etd/4086

OPAL. (2011). Beyond OER: Shifting focus to open educational practices. Open Education Quality Initiative.

Orwenjo, D. O., & Erastus, F. K. (2018). Challenges of adopting open educational resources (OER) in Kenyan secondary school: The case of open resources for English language teaching (ORELT). Journal of Learning for Development, 5(2), 148-162. https://doi.org/10.56059/jl4d.v5i2.282

Percy, T., & Van Belle, J. P. (2012). Exploring the barriers and enablers to the use of open educational resources by university academics in Africa. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 378, 112-128. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-33442-9_8

Phalachandra, B., & Abeywardena, I. S. (2016). Open educational resources in the Commonwealth 2016. Commonwealth of Learning.

Siemens, G. (2013). MOOCs: How did we get here? [PowerPoint slides]. Society for Learning Analytics Research. Presentation from the 10th Annual Open Education Conference. http://fr.slideshare.net/gsiemens/open-education-2013

Tella, A. (2020). Interactivity, usability and aesthetics as predictors of undergraduates’ preference for university library websites. South African Journal of Library & Information Science, 86(2), 16-25. https://doi.org/7553/86-2-1905

Ukwoma, S., & Onyebinama, C. O. (2020). Access and use of open access resources by undergraduate students in federal universities in South East Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice (e-journal). https://digitalcommons.unl.edu/libphilprac/4124

UNESCO. (2017). Ljubljana OER action plan 2017. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://en.unesco.org/sites/default/files/ljubljana_oer_action_plan_2017.pdf

UNESCO. (2021). Open educational resources. https://en.unesco.org/themes/ict-education/oer

UNESCO. (2022). Accessible open educational resources (OER): Briefing paper. Programme and Meeting Document. Retrieved from https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000380471 (Accessed 18 September 2022).

United Nations. (2015). Transforming our world: The 2030 agenda for sustainable development. Retrieved October 5, 2019, from https://www.un.org/ga/search/view_doc.asp?symbol=A/RES/70/1&Lang=E

Whitfield, S., & Robinson, Z. (2012). Open educational resources: The challenges of ‘usability’ and copyright clearance. Planet, 25(1), 51-54. https://doi.org/10.11120/plan.2012.00250051

Wright, C. R., & Reju, S. A. (2012). Developing and deploying OER in sub-Saharan Africa: Building on the present. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(2), 181-220. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v13i2.1185

Yuan, L., & Powell, S. (2013). MOOCs and open education: Implications for higher education. A white paper. United Kingdom: JISC-CETIS. Retrieved from http://publications.cetis.org.uk/2013/667

Yuan, L., Macneill, S., & Kraan, W. (2008). Open educational resources - Opportunities and challenges for higher education. JISC CETIS. Retrieved from https://oerknowledgecloud.org/sites/oerknowledgecloud.org/files/OER_Briefing_Paper.pdf

Zaid, Y. A., & Alabi, A. O. (2020). Sustaining open educational resources (OER) initiatives in Nigerian universities. Open Learning: The Journal of Open, Distance and e-Learning. https://doi.org/10.1080/02680513.2020.1713738

Zhang, X., Tlili, A., Nascimbeni, F., Burgos, D., Huang, R., Chang, T., Jemni, M., & Khribi, M. (2020). Accessibility within open educational resources and practices for disabled learners: A systematic literature review. Smart Learning Environments, 7(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40561-019-0113-2

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/ijie.v8i2.85288