Editorial Policies

Focus and Scope

IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education) aims to increase knowledge and understanding of ways in which digital technology can enhance education and vice versa, through the publication of high-quality research, which extends theory and practice. The Editors welcome research papers on the pedagogical uses of digital technology, where the focus is broad enough to be of the interest to a wider education community.

The publication of small-scale evaluations of specific software/systems in specialist domains or particular courses in individual institutions is encouraged for submission. But, the broader relevance findings that are explicitly drawn out in the papers are preferable. Papers that include discussions of the implementation of software and/or hardware should focus on the context of use, the user/system interface, usability issues and evaluations of the user experience and impacts on and implications for learning and teaching.

Detailed information on implementation architecture should NOT be included in the paper but may be provided via hot-links. We welcome review papers that include clear aims (research questions), a framework of analysis, and conclusions that reflect the aims of the paper.
Selection criteria
Papers must:
• align with the aims of the journal
• be within the scope of the journal
• include an appropriate, current and comprehensive literature review
• have a sound research methodology (see additional notes on methodology below)
• evidence a high level of critical analysis
• explicitly indicate how they advance the field
• comply with the author guidelines
• not have been submitted/published elsewhere

IJIE (Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education) welcomes both qualitative and quantitative research of the highest quality. High-quality research is internally consistent, theoretically informed, evidence-based, rigorous and transparent, and ethically informed.

 

Section Policies

Technology in Education

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

Empirical Papers

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed

LITERATURE REVIEW

Checked Open Submissions Checked Indexed Checked Peer Reviewed
 

Peer Review Process

 

The peer review practice is intended to ensure that the published materials are of sound quality. It is considered as the heart of good scholarly publication and is carried out by all reputable scientific journals. Our referees play a vital role in maintaining the high standards of the Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education and all manuscripts are peer reviewed following the procedure outlined below. The submission and review process will be carried out online through the Online Journal System.

Initial manuscript evaluation 
The Editors first evaluate all papers. It is rare, but it is possible for an exceptional manuscript to be accepted at this stage. The article rejection justification for this stage are insufficiently original, have serious scientific flaws, have poor grammar or English language, or are outside the aims and scope of the journal. Those that meet the minimum criteria are normally passed on to at least 1 expert for review.

Authors of manuscripts rejected at this stage will be informed within 2-3 weeks of paper reception.

Type of peer review 
This journal employs a blind review, where the author and referee remain anonymous throughout the process.

How the referee is selected 
Whenever possible, referees are matched to the paper according to their expertise. Our database is constantly being updated. We welcome suggestions for referees from the author though these recommendations are not necessarily used.

Referee reports 
Referees are asked to evaluate whether the manuscript:
– Is original.
– Is comply with the focus and scope of the journal.
– Makes a theoretical contribution to the study of family business.
– Is methodologically sound.
– Follows appropriate ethical guidelines.
– Has results which are clearly presented and support the conclusions.
– Correctly references previous relevant work.

Language correction is not part of the peer review process, but referees may, if so wish, suggest corrections to the manuscript.

How long does the review process take? 
The time required for the review process is dependent on the response of the referees. However, the typical time for the Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education is approximately 2-4 weeks. Should the referees' reports contradict one another or a report is unnecessarily delayed, a further expert opinion will be sought. In rare cases for which it is extremely difficult to find a second referee to review the manuscript, or when the one referee's report has thoroughly convinced the Editor, decisions at this stage to accept, reject or ask the author for a revision are made on the basis of only one referee's report. The Editor's decision will be sent to the author with recommendations made by the referees, which usually includes verbatim comments by the referees. Revised manuscripts might be returned to the initial referees who may then request another revision of a manuscript.

Final report 
A final decision to accept or reject the manuscript will be sent to the author along with any recommendations made by the referees, and may include verbatim comments by the referees.

Plagiarism Check  
The journal advocates the integrity and credibility of the published papers. Plagiarism is against our policies. We request similarity report of maximum 30%.

The Editor's decision is final 
Referees advise the Editor, who is responsible for the final decision to accept or reject the article.

Becoming a referee for the Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education. 
If you are not currently a referee for the Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education but would like to be considered as a referee, please contact the editorial office at: cbudiyanto@staff.uns.ac.id. The benefits of refereeing for the Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education include the opportunity to read, see and evaluate the latest work in your research area at an early stage, and to contribute to the overall integrity of academic research and its published documentation.

 

Publication Frequency

The Indonesian Journal of Informatics Education (IJIE) publishes bi-annually on June and December.

 

Archiving

This journal utilizes the LOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...

 

Article Processing Fee

The submission and review of papers in the IJIE are free. A small amount of $50 per paper for article processing fee, however, will be requested before the publication of the article.

 

APC Processing Waiver

Although basically, the publication of the selected paper is on a paid basis, we offer APC waiver for authors from South East Asia, South Asia, Africa, and developing countries in the world. 

Authors could reach the Editor In-Chief  at ijie@fkip.uns.ac.id for further inquiry. 

 

Plagiarism check

We strongly against plagiarism in our published papers. Despite papers submitted to the system will be checked for similarities from time to time, authors are encouraged to self-assess their papers before submitted to IJIE. 

 

Paper obtains a similarity level more than 30% will be rejected without further consideration. 

 

Open Access Policy

The journal provides readers with immediate free access to all published content. The access to the journal's content will be available online once the issue is published. To download the open access papers, however, may be subject to registration into the journal system.

 

License Term

The IJIE allows adaptations of the published papers to be shared for individual or commercial use. The publisher, however, urges the adopting parties to share their work under the similar licensing term. 

The following sign will be displayed in each article. 

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

 

Copyright and Permission

IJIE suggests that the authors retain the copyright of their works. It also encourages the publication of the work in any other format by the author or other interested parties. 

IJIE, however, request that the latest version of the publication cites the initial published version in IJIE.   

 

Publication Ethics

Plagiarism Checker

The article that can be reviewed by editor board after completing the attachment of plagiarism checker and stated that article at least 80% is origin. The following are the tools of checker:

  1. Plagiarisma
  2. Duplicity-Checker 
  3. Turnitin
  4. Plagiarism Checker
  5. Other tools of plagiarism

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of an article in a peer-reviewed  is an essential building block in the development of a coherent and respected network of knowledge. It is a direct reflection of the quality of the work of the authors and the institutions that support them. Peer-reviewed articles support and embody the scientific method. It is therefore important to agree upon standards of expected ethical behavior for all parties involved in the act of publishing: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher and the society.  

Universitas Sebelas Maret as publisher of IJIE takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. 

Publication decisions

The editor of the  IJIE is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The validation of the work in question and its importance to researchers and readers must always drive such decisions. The editors may be guided by the policies of the journal's editorial board and constrained by such legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editors may confer with other editors or reviewers in making this decision.

Fair play

An editor at any time evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content without regard to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, citizenship, or political philosophy of the authors.

Confidentiality

The editor and any editorial staff must not disclose any information about a submitted manuscript to anyone other than the corresponding author, reviewers, potential reviewers, other editorial advisers, and the publisher, as appropriate.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished materials disclosed in a submitted manuscript must not be used in an editor's own research without the express written consent of the author.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

Peer review assists the editor in making editorial decisions and through the editorial communications with the author may also assist the author in improving the paper.

Promptness

Any selected referee who feels unqualified to review the research reported in a manuscript or knows that its prompt review will be impossible should notify the editor and excuse himself from the review process.

Confidentiality

Any manuscripts received for review must be treated as confidential documents. They must not be shown to or discussed with others except as authorized by the editor.

Standards of Objectivity

Reviews should be conducted objectively. Personal criticism of the author is inappropriate. Referees should express their views clearly with supporting arguments.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Reviewers should identify relevant published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any statement that an observation, derivation, or argument had been previously reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any substantial similarity or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Privileged information or ideas obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and not used for personal advantage. Reviewers should not consider manuscripts in which they have conflicts of interest resulting from competitive, collaborative, or other relationships or connections with any of the authors, companies, or institutions connected to the papers.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors of reports of original research should present an accurate account of the work performed as well as an objective discussion of its significance. Underlying data should be represented accurately in the paper. A paper should contain sufficient detail and references to permit others to replicate the work. Fraudulent or knowingly inaccurate statements constitute unethical behaviour and are unacceptable.

Originality and Plagiarism

The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behaviour and is unacceptable.

Acknowledgement of Sources

Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorship should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the conception, design, execution, or interpretation of the reported study. All those who have made significant contributions should be listed as co-authors. Where there are others who have participated in certain substantive aspects of the research project, they should be acknowledged or listed as contributors. The corresponding author should ensure that all appropriate co-authors and no inappropriate co-authors are included on the paper, and that all co-authors have seen and approved the final version of the paper and have agreed to its submission for publication.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors should disclose in their manuscript any financial or other substantive conflict of interest that might be construed to influence the results or interpretation of their manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be disclosed.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author discovers a significant error or inaccuracy in his/her own published work, it is the author’s obligation to promptly notify the journal editor or publisher and cooperate with the editor to retract or correct the paper.