Fraport AG Frankfurt Airport Services Worldwide v. Republic of the Philippines: A Critical Analysis

Asriati Asriati, Muhammad Ilham Agus Salim

Abstract


Under ICSID arbitration related case of Fraport AG Frankfurt v. Philipphines have long been a focal point in discussions about the protection of foreign investment, state sovereignty and the enforceability of international arbitration decisions. This paper critically examines the implications of the case, focusing on the arbitral award’s reasoning, the concept of investor due diligence, and its broader consequences for international investment law that contextualize through comparisons with two other landmark cases: Saluka v. Czech (a successful claim) and Inceysa v. El Salvador (an unsuccessful claim). In Saluka, the tribunal upheld the claim of investor, emphasizing the host state's responsibility to ensure fairness and avoid arbitrary actions, even when legal complexities were involved. By contrast, in Inceysa, the tribunal rejected the investor's claim due to illegality in the investment's formation, aligning with the strict adherence to the legality principle seen in Fraport. However, the unique flaw in Fraport lies in the tribunal's failure to fully scrutinize the Philippines' complicity in enabling the investment despite its alleged non-compliance with domestic law. Unlike Saluka, which balanced investor protection with state sovereignty, or Inceysa, which rightfully penalized outright fraud, the Fraport decision rigidly applied the legality clause without considering the state's role in fostering ambiguity. This oversight diminished the case’s potential to address shared responsibilities and regulatory inconsistencies, which are crucial for a fair investment regime in evolving global markets.


Keywords


arbitral tribunal’s reasoning; international investment law; legality clause

Full Text:

PDF
rticle

References


Bjorklund, A. K. (2013). Yearbook on international investment law and policy 2011-2012. Oxford University Press.

Crawford, J. (2012). Brownlie's principles of public international law (8th ed.). Oxford University Press.

Dolzer, R., & Schreuer, C. (2008). Principles of international investment law. Oxford University Press.

Van Harten, G. (2013). Investment treaty arbitration and due diligence. Cambridge Studies in International and Comparative Law.

Bjorklund, A. K. (2010). Investment treaty law and the anti-dummy law: A misalignment of expectations. Journal of International Arbitration.

Marboe, I. (2017). Calculation of compensation and damages in international investment law (2nd ed.). Oxford University Press.

Reyes, M. (2008). Legal ambiguities in Philippine anti-dummy law enforcement. Philippine Law Journal.

Schreuer, C. (2006). The principle of estoppel in international law. Oxford Reports on International Law.

Schreuer, C. H. (2009). The ICSID Convention: A commentary (2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Yannaca-Small, C. (2006). Improving the balance between investor protection and state sovereignty. OECD Working Papers on International Investment.

World Duty Free Company Limited v. Republic of Kenya, ICSID Case No. ARB/00/7, Award (October 4, 2006).

IAREPORTER. (n.d.). Looking back: In Fraport v. Philippines, a tribunal majority declined jurisdiction after deciding that an airport concession investment had been made in violation of local law. Investment Arbitration Reporte

Wälde, T. (2010). Abuse of process in investment arbitration. ICSID Review.

International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes. (2007). ICSID Convention, rules, and regulations. Retrieved from https://icsid.worldbank.org

Philippine Anti-Dummy Law, Republic Act No. 7042. (1991). Retrieved from https://www.lawphil.net

Saluka Investments BV v. Czech Republic, Partial Award, UNCITRAL Arbitration Rules (March 17, 2006).




DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v12i2.96262

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Asriati Asriati

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.


Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi

Online ISSN : 2777-0818
Print ISSN : 2338-1051
Website : https://jurnal.uns.ac.id/hpe
Email : jurnalhpe@mail.uns.ac.id cc to jurnalhpeuns@gmail.com
Published by : Universitas Sebelas Maret
Office : Master of Law-Postgraduate Program, Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia
Ir. Sutami Street, No. 36A, Surakarta, Jawa Tengah 57126- Phone 0271-642595

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.