Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran LIGEKA_21 Disertai Google Earth Terhadap Critical Spatial Thinking Peserta Didik SMA

Nadya Putri Fitriani, Sugiyanto Sugiyanto

Abstract

This study aims to determine the effect of LIGEKA_21 learning model on students' critical spatial thinking. This research is a quantitative research with quasi experimental method and nonequivalent control group design. The population in this study were all students of class XI IPS SMA Negeri 1 Teras Boyolali. The research sample was taken randomly, in this study the sample used was class XI-E as the experimental class and class XI-G as the control class. Data collection techniques using unstructured interviews, observation, tests in the form of descriptions, and documentation. Indicators used in measuring students' critical spatial thinking ability use six indicators developed by Huynh and Sharpe (2013) which include analysis, comprehension, representation, spatial relationship, scale, and application. The data analysis technique uses the Independent Sample T-Test with a significance level of 5%. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded that there is an effect of the application of the LIGEKA_21 model on critical spatial thinking of students assisted by Google Earth media. This is evidenced by the results of the Independent Sample T-Test test calculation which has a sig. (2 tailed) value of 0.000. 

Keywords

Critical Spatial Thinking; Google Earth; LIGEKA_21 Learning Model

Full Text:

PDF

References

Bearman, N., Jones, N., André, I., Cachinho, H. A., & DeMers, M. (2016). The future role of GIS education in creating critical spatial thinkers. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 40(3), 394–408. https://doi.org/10.1080/03098265.2016.1144729

Huynh, N. T., & Sharpe, B. (2013). An Assessment Instrument to Measure Geospatial Thinking Expertise. Journal of Geography, 112(1), 3–17. https://doi.org/10.1080/00221341.2012.682227

Liu, R., Greene, R., Li, X., Wang, T., Lu, M., & Xu, Y. (2019). Comparing geoinformation and geography students’ spatial thinking skills with a human-geography pedagogical approach in a Chinese context. Sustainability (Switzerland), 11(20). https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205573

Maretta, D., Sugiyanto, S., & Tjahjono, G. A. (2024). Efektivitas Model LIGEKA_21 Untuk Pengembangan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis dan Kreatif Peserta Didik Dalam Pembelajaran Geografi (Penelitian Kuasi Eksperimen K.D. Posisi Strategis Indonesiasebagai Poros Maritim Dunia Kelas XI di SMA Negeri 1 Karanganyar). Geadidaktika, 4(1), 34. https://doi.org/10.20961/gea.v4i1.71860

Nikmah, K., & Pamungkas, S. (2022). Pemanfaatan Aplikasi Google Earth Dalam Pembelajaran Sejarah Di Sma Negeri 4 Kota Jambi. Istoria: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Sejarah Universitas Batanghari, 6(2), 41. https://doi.org/10.33087/istoria.v6i2.150

Nursa’Ban, M., Kumaidi, K., & Mukminan, M. (2020). Factors of critical spatial thinking for a geography metacognition assessment in indonesian senior high schools. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 10(2), 186–204. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.686050

Saputro, R., Liesnoor, D., Setyowati, & Hardati, P. (2020). The Students Spatial Critical Thinking Skill by Using Map and Remote Sensing Imagery on Geography Lesson. 443(Iset 2019), 250–254. https://doi.org/10.2991/assehr.k.200620.049

Sinton, D. S. (2017). Critical Spatial Thinking. International Encyclopedia of Geography, March 2017, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118786352.wbieg0706

Sugiyanto, S., Prihadi, S., & Ronggowulan, L. (2023). Application of the Ligeka_21 Model To Develop 21St-Century Skills for Students in Learning Geography in High School. GeoEco, 9(1), 85. https://doi.org/10.20961/ge.v9i1.67500

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/gea.v6i1.100014

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.