Eksistensi dan Pengelolaan Museum Bumiputera 1912 sebagai Objek Wisata Edukasi Sejarah
Abstract
This research is a qualitative descriptive study, with a case study approach. The data source comes from the Bumiputera 1912 Museum. Data collection techniques include observation, interviews, and document studies. The sampling technique used purposive sampling. Data validity uses triangulation of data sources and methods. Data analysis techniques include data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion drawing.
Based on the research results, it can be concluded: (1) The Bumiputera 1912 Museum was established to commemorate the nation's economic history related to insurance for the first indigenous people, which was established from mutual assistance funds until it became a large insurance company. However, the current condition of the Bumiputera 1912 Museum is experiencing a decline in its existence due to various inhibiting factors such as the lack of funding from the company, the lack of technological intervention in the museum, and the lack of promotional media. (2) The management of the Bumiputera 1912 Museum is unstructured. The management of the Bumiputera 1912 Museum is carried out by employees of the Bumiputera Insurance Magelang Branch office who also serve as museum officers and managers. Human resources are still very inadequate and the museum's unclear management structure is a real obstacle faced by the museum, so that in reality the Museum is poorly maintained and less known by the public as a historical educational tourist attraction.
Keywords: Bumiputera 1912 Museum, Existence, Management, Tourism, History
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agustin, D. A., & Rahmatin, L. S. (2024). Hambatan dan tantangan Museum Pendidikan Surabaya sebagai wisata edukasi. JIIP: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan, 7(12), 13635–13641.
Asmara, D. (2019). Peran museum dalam pembelajaran sejarah. Kaganga: Jurnal Pendidikan Sejarah dan Riset Sosial Humaniora, 2(1), 10–20.
Bustan. (2020). Museum: Sumber belajar dan pariwisata sejarah budaya. Social Landscape Journal, 1(1), 1–2.
Dirjen Kebudayaan. (2018). Rencana induk permuseuman nasional. Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan.
Hasan, Z. (2024). Strategi promosi museum di era digital dengan optimalisasi media sosial dan pemilihan brand ambassador. Historiography: Journal of Indonesian History and Education, 4(2), 122–131.
Istiqomah, L. G., & Sabardila, A. (2023). Pemanfaatan Museum Patiayam sebagai wisata edukasi di Kudus. Jurnal Wahana Pendidikan, 10(2), 327–338.
Juwita, T., Novianti, E., Tahir, R., & Nugraha, A. (2020). Pengembangan model wisata edukasi di Museum Pendidikan Nasional. JITHOR: Jurnal Ilmu dan Teknologi dalam Horison Riset, 3(1), 8–10.
Moleong, L. J. (2017). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif (Edisi Revisi). Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.
Nugraha, R. N., & Rosa, P. D. (2022). Pengelolaan Museum Bahari sebagai daya tarik wisata edukasi di Jakarta. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(6), 6477–6479.
Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 66 Tahun 2015 tentang Museum.
Purwanggono, G. D. (2018). Membangkitkan Daya Tarik Museum Sebagai Objek Dan Atraksi
Wisata. Jurnal Pariwisata Indonesia, Volume 13 No 2, 29–33
Rukmana, I. (2019). Strategi pengelolaan Museum Benteng Vredeburg sebagai wisata warisan budaya di Yogyakarta. Jurnal Tata Kelola Seni, 5(2), 103–106.
Sugiyono. (2019). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Tuismiwati.(2025).Wawancara pribadi mengenai pengelolaan Museum Bumiputera 1912. (Badri, Pewawancara)
Wahyu.(2025).Wawancara pribadi mengenai pengelolaan Museum Bumiputera 1912. (Badri, Pewawancara)
Widyasti, D. M. P. (n.d.). Eksistensi Museum Ndalem Wuryoningratan dalam mendukung pariwisata Kota Solo. Jurnal Ilmiah Desain Interior, (tanpa volume dan nomor)
