Focus and Scope

1. Agricultural Socio-Economic
2. Agribusiness Management
3. Agribusiness Development
4. Agricultural Policy
5. Empowerment of Agribusiness
6. Sustainability of Agribusiness

Section Policies

Articles

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Editorial

Open Submissions

Indexed

Peer Reviewed

Peer Review Process

1. Articles in this journal are a publication of research results, reviews of previous research results, and/or ideas in the fields of agricultural socio-economics, agribusiness management, agribusiness development, agricultural policy, empowerment of agribusiness community, and sustainability of agribusiness.
2. The author guarantees the originality of the article and that it has never been published or is in the process of being considered by another journal (a statement of originality).
3. The review process is done by blind review with a peer group system.
4. The article is written following the template that has been provided.
5. The article is submitted via online submissions
6. Articles that have been in the editorial board will receive three possibilities of result assessment, namely: (1) accepted without revision; (2) accepted with revision; (3) rejected because it does not meet the requirements.

Open Access Policy

This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.

Publication Ethics

Publication Statement

Agrisema is a national journal in collaboration with Bestari which is published twice a year online by the Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret. This statement explains the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the publishing process including the author, editorial board, and publisher.

Publication Ethics Guidelines

The publication of articles in the Agrisema journal is a very important process in developing coherent and respectable knowledge. This is a direct reflection of the quality of the author’s work and the institutions that support the author or researchers. The articles reviewed contain and support scientific methodology. Therefore, it is important to agree on standards of ethical behavior expected for all parties involved in the publishing process including authors, editors in chief, editorial board, section editor, and publishers.

The Faculty of Agriculture, Universitas Sebelas Maret as the publisher of Agrisema responsible for supervising all stages of publication seriously and recognizing ethical and other responsibilities. The institution ensures that any advertising and other commercial revenues have no impact or influence on editorial decisions. Apart from that, the institutions also help to communicate with other journal publishers if it is useful and necessary.

Decision
The editor is responsible for deciding which articles will be processed and should be published. The validation of these works and their importance to authors and readers should support such a decision. The editors are guided by the journal’s editorial policies and constrained by laws covering libel, copyright, and plagiarism. Editors can discuss with other editors or assessment teams to decide on policies.

Confidentiality
Expert editors and executive editors are prohibited from disclosing any information related to submitted manuscripts to anyone other than the author themselves, senior editor, Bestari, and publishers.

Conflict of interest
All unpublished content written in text is prohibited for use on research of the editors without confirmation from the author.

Objectivity
Assessment must be carried out objectively. Personal criticism of the author is not permitted. The reviewers must express their views using supporting arguments.

Confession
PReviewer should identify the relevant article that has not been cited by the authors. Any previously reported observations, derivations, or arguments must be accompanied by relevant citations. Reviewers should also ask editors to pay attention to similarities or overlaps between assessed and published texts.

Originality and Plagiarism
Authors must ensure that they have written their original article, in addition, they must cite properly if they take the article or words of other authors.

Malpractice Ethics
In general, an author is not allowed to have the same publication that has a similar research focus in more than one journal.

Screening Plagiarism

1. Plagiarism and self-plagiarism are not allowed;
2. The authors should ensure that they have written entirely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been appropriately cited or quoted;
3. An author should not in general publish manuscripts describing essentially the same research in more than one journal or primary publication. Submitting the same manuscript to more than one journal concurrently constitutes unethical publishing behavior and is unacceptable;
4. Proper acknowledgment of the work of others must always be given. Authors should cite publications that have been influential in determining the nature of the reported work.

Working Process:

1. Editorial Team checking manuscript on offline and online database manually (checking proper citation and quotation);
2. Editorial Team checking manuscript by using Turnitin app. If it is found plagiarism indication (25% maximum), the board will reject the manuscript immediately.

Copyright Notice

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

1. Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).