Transforming Microteaching through Flipbook for Preparing Future Accounting Educators towards SDG 4

Sri Widi Lestari, Khansha Sindra Irfani, Dwi Puji Astuti, Iwan Maulana

Abstract

his study investigates the role of digital innovation in teacher education by integrating a flipbook-based microteaching handbook into the Accounting Education program. Although printed modules remain widely used in microteaching courses, they often fail to effectively engage digital-native student teachers or support the development of essential 21st-century teaching competencies. Using a quasi-experimental pretest–posttest control group design, 60 fifth-semester students were assigned to an experimental group using the digital flipbook and a control group using printed modules. Microteaching performance was assessed through standardized rubric scores. Results showed significantly greater improvement in the experimental group, t(58)=4.37, p<0.001, with a large effect size (Cohen’s d=0.86). The experimental group achieved an 18.3% learning gain compared to 8.1% in the control group. Questionnaire data also indicated positive student perceptions regarding improved understanding (85%), confidence (92%), and motivation (88%). These findings demonstrate that flipbook-based materials not only enhance microteaching performance but also support higher engagement and digital readiness. Integrating interactive digital learning resources into teacher education can therefore contribute to achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4, particularly Target 4.c on preparing qualified and digitally competent educators.

Keywords

educational technology, learning media development, microteaching; flipbook; accounting education; SDG 4

Full Text:

PDF

References

Allen, D. W., & Ryan, K. (1969). Micro - teaching. Addison - Welsey, 7(1), 541–559.

Bandura. (1977). Social learning theory. In Elgar Encyclopedia of Cross-Cultural Management (pp. 133–134). https://doi.org/10.4337/9781803928180.ch33

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. In Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research Design : Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. In SAGE Publications.

Fraenkel R. Jack, Wallen E. Norman, H. H. H. (2019). How to Design and Evaluate Research in Education. In McGraw-Hill.

Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64–74. https://doi.org/10.1119/1.18809

Hartoyo, I., Dew, N. R., Saragih, B., Eko Isdianto, M., & Khairina, Y. (2024). Interactive Digital Flipbooks: Enhancing Engagement and Accessibility in Education for Diverse Learners in Technology in ELT Course at Universitas Negeri Medan. 7(2), 342–355.

Hattie, J. (2008). Visible learning: A synthesis of over 800 meta-analyses relating to achievement. In Visible Learning: A Synthesis of Over 800 Meta-Analyses Relating to Achievement. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203887332

Jonassen, D. (1999). Designing constructivist learning environments. Instructional-Design Theories and Models: A New Paradigm of Instructional Theory, 2, 215–239. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781410603784-16

Liao, Y. H., Tang, K. S., Chen, C. J., Huang, Y. H., & Tiao, M. M. (2023). A study on how using an interactive multimedia e-book improves teachers’ ability to teach evidence-based medicine depending on their seniority. BMC Medical Education, 21(1), 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-021-02984-2

Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia Learning. Multimedia Learning, 41. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139164603

Moreno, R., & Mayer, R. (2007). Interactive multimodal learning environments: Special issue on interactive learning environments: Contemporary issues and trends. Educational Psychology Review, 19(3), 309–326. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10648-007-9047-2

Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1994). Psychometric theory (3rd ed.). Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 17(3), 275–280. https://doi.org/10.1177/073428299901700307

Nurrahmah, N., Rahman, A., & Annas, S. (2025). Exploring Thinking and Speaking Patterns of Pre-service Teachers in Microteaching: A Cognitive-Reflective Perspective. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 2(3), 12. https://doi.org/10.47134/ppm.v2i3.1652

Nursjanti, F., Amaliawiati, L., & Nurani, N. (2021). Impact of Covid-19 on Higher Education Institutions in Indonesia. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(1), 685–698. https://doi.org/10.33403/rigeo.800608

Ramadhanti, D., & Yanda, D. P. (2025). Microteaching Practice and Educational Field Experiences: The Impact on the Professional Performance of Prospective Teachers. IJECA (International Journal of Education and Curriculum Application), 8(1), 103. https://doi.org/10.31764/ijeca.v8i1.29139

Shadish R William, Cook D. Thomas, C. T. D. (2002). EXPERIMENTAL AND QUASI-EXPERIMENTAL DESIGNS FOR GENERALIZED CAUSAL INFERENCE. Dimensions in Health Service, 53(1), 12–13, 16.

Sudiarti, D., Ashilah, N. M., & Nurjanah, U. (2023). Implementation of flipped learning with flipbook media assistance on learning outcomes and critical thinking abilities. Jurnal Inovasi Teknologi Pendidikan, 10(4), 385–394. https://doi.org/10.21831/jitp.v10i4.58191

UNESCO. (2020). Inclusion and education All maen All. In Inclusive Education Across Cultures: Crossing Boundaries, Sharing Ideas.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/teknodika.v24i1.108245

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.