Ukuran Tubuh Entok di Tiga Kabupaten Provinsi Jawa Tengah
Abstract
regency (Pekalongan, Magelang dan Demak) in Central Java. Material of the experiment was 210 muscovy ducks at 7 months of age (70 birds/regency, 35 males and 35 females). Parameters observed were body weight, bill length, bill width, head length, head circumference, high head, neck length, neck circumference, wing length, body length, breast circumference, body height, breast length, femur length, tibia length, tibia circumference, maxilla length, and length of third toe. Data of body measurement were analyzed through univariate and multivariate using SAS.Whereas the Mahalanobis distance were analyzed using MEGA 5 (UPGMA) to construct the phylogeny tree. Result showed that there were some differences (P<0,05) between male and female of muscovy duck in each regency at all variables. Wing length and breast circumference were the distinguishing variable between regencys. Muscovy duck from Magelang had a closer genetic distance to Pekalongan than Demak.
Keywords: body measurement, muscovy duck
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Balai Pengkajian Teknologi Pertanian. 2010. Budidaya Ternak Itik. Badan Peneliti dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bandung.
Brahmantyo, B., R. H. Mulyono, dan A. Sutisna. 2002. Ukuran dan bentuk itik pekin (Anas platyrhynchos), entok impor dan entok lokal (Cairina moschata). Dalam: Lokakarya Nasional Pengelolaan dan Perlindungan Sumber Daya Genetik di Indonesia: Manfaat Ekonomi untuk Mewujudkan Ketahanan Nasional. Balai Penelitian Ternak, Bogor. Hal.266-272.
Brahmantiyo, B., L. H. Prasetyo, A.R. Setioko, dan R. H. Mulyono. 2003. Pendugaan jarak genetik dan faktor peubah pembeda galur Itik (Alabio, Bali, Khaki Campbell, Mojosari dan Pegagan) melalui Analisis Morfometrik. Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner 8: 1-7.
Legates, J. E. and Warwick. 1990. Breeding and Improvement of Farm Animals. 8th Ed. McGraw-Hill Publising Company, New York.
Meulen, S. J. and D. G. Dikken. 2004. Duck Keeping in the Tropics. Agromisa Foundation, Wageningen.
National Department of Agriculture. 1996. Muscovy Ducks (makoue). Agricultural Research Council, Pretoria.
Nei, M. 1987. Molecular Evolutionary Genetics. Colombia University Press, New York.
Ogah, D. M. 2009. Analysis of morphological traits of geographically separated population of indigenous muscovy duck (Cairina moschata). International Journal of Poultry Science 8 (2): 179-182.
Ogah, D. M., A. A. Alaga, and M. O. Momoh. 2009. Principal component factor analysis of the morphostructural traits of Muscovy duck. International Journal of Poultry Science 8 (11): 1100-1103.
Raji, A. O., J. U. Igwebuike, and M. T. Usman. 2009. Zoometrical body measurements and their relation with live weight in matured local Muscovy ducks in Borno state Nigeria. Journal of Agricultural and Biological Science 4 (3): 58-62.
SAS. 1990. SAS/STAT Users Guide Version 6. Fourth Edition. Volume 2. SAS Campus Drive. Cary. North Carolina 27513, USA.
Udeh, I. and C. C. Ogbu. 2011. Principal component analysis ofbody measurements in three strainsof broiler chicken. Science World Journal 6 (2): 11-14.
Yakubu, A. 2011. Discriminant analysis of sexual dimorphism inmorphological traits of african Muscovy ducks. Arch. Zootec 60 (232): 1115-1123.
Yakubu, A. 2013. Characterisation of the local Muscovy duck in Nigeria and its potential for egg and meat production. World’s Poultry Science Journal69: 931-938.
Yakubu, A. and S. B. Ugbo. 2011. An assessment of biodiversity in
morphological traits of Muscovy ducks in Nigeriausing discriminant analysis. In: International Proceedings of Chemical, Biological and Environmental Engineering. pp 389-391.
Yakubu, A., F. G. Kaankuka, and S.B. Ugbo. 2011. Morphometric traits of Muscovy ducks from two agro-ecological zones of Nigeria. Tropicultura 29 (2): 121-124.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
