- TEMPLATE
Modification of Secondary Dyes in Gram Staining Protocol to Increase The Diagnostic Accuracy of Bacterial Vaginosis Infections
Abstract
Introduction: The diagnosis of bacterial infection can only be made by gram stain with patient information. One of the problems with gram staining is that the resulting microscopic images look dim, making them prone to misinterpretation. Researchers conducted a study on modifying secondary dyes in gram staining to improve the accuracy of the diagnosis of Bacterial vaginosis infections.
Methods: This research is a laboratory experimental study with a cross sectional approach. The sample of this study consisted of anaerobic gram-negative rods on vaginal swabs of patients diagnosed with Bacterial vaginosis at Dr. Moewardi Hospital and Sebelas Maret University Hospital during March to July 2022. The samples were then treated in the form of gram staining with different secondary dyes and then compared.
Results: The color intensity of anaerobic gram-negative rod bacteria samples treated with gram staining using fuchsin secondary dye appeared to be stronger than safranin secondary dye. Likewise, the resulting focus looks clearer. The diagnostic test showed that modification of secondary dyes in gram staining by substituting safranin into fuchsin increased the color intensity and focus of preparations
Conclusion: Modification of secondary dye on gram staining by replacing secondary dye of safranin to fuchsin can improve the quality of gram staining results on anaerobic gram negative bacteria thereby increasing the accuracy of diagnosis and treatment given.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
1. Aniq A, Mutsaqof N, Suryani E, Kom SSM. Sistem Pakar Untuk Mendiagnosis Penyakit Infeksi Menggunakan Forward Chaining. ITSMART. 2015;4(1):1–5.
2. Africa CWJ, Nel J, Stemmet M. Anaerobes and Bacterial Vaginosis in Pregnancy : Virulence Factors Contributing to Vaginal Colonisation. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014;11(7):6979–7000.
3. Osman Erkmen. Practice 10 Gram Staining Technique. In: Laboratory Practices in Microbiology. s.l.:Elsevier. 2022. p. 99-105.
4. Rahim A. Dasar Pemeriksaan Kuman-Kuman Aerob, Mikroaerofilik, dan Anaerob. In: Mikrobiologi Kedokteran. 2014. p. 70–4.
5. Samuel LP, Balada-llasat J, Harrington A. Multicenter Assessment of Gram Stain Error Rates. J Clin Microbiol. 2016;54(6):1442–7.
6. Sandle T. Assessing Gram-Stain Error Rates within The Pharmaceutical Microbiology Laboratory. Eur J Parenter Pharm Sci. 2020;25(1):1–14.
7. Jiwintarum Y, Rohmi, Prayuda IDPM. B Buah Naga (Hylocereus Polyrhizus) sebagai Pewarna Alami untuk Pewarnaan Bakteri. J Kesehat Prima. 2016;10(2):1726–34.
8. Nishant Tripathi, Amit Sapra. Gram Staining (1 ed.). Treasure Island (FL): StatPearls. 2021.
9. Lyudmila Boyanova. Direct Gram Staining and Its Various Benefits in the Diagnosis of Bacterial infections. Postgraduate Medicine. 2013;130(1):105-110.
10. Anvarinejad M, Pouladfar G, Japoni A, Bolandparvaz S, Satiary Z, Abbasi P, et al. Isolation and Antibiotic Susceptibility of the Microorganisms Isolated from Diabetic Foot Infections in Nemazee Hospital , Southern Iran. J Pathog. 2015;2015:1–7.
11. Del Rio-Pertuz G, Gutiérrez JF, Triana AJ, Molinares JL, Robledo-Solano AB, Meza JL, et al. Usefulness of sputum gram stain for etiologic diagnosis in community-acquired pneumonia: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Infect Dis. 2019;19(1):1–12.
12. Bautista CT, Wurapa E, Sateren WB, Morris S, Hollingsworth B, Sanchez JL. Bacterial vaginosis : a synthesis of the literature on etiology , prevalence , risk factors , and relationship with chlamydia and gonorrhea infections. Mil Med Res [Internet]. 2016;3(4):1–10. Available from: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s40779-016-0074-5.
13. Martin DH, Marrazzo JM. The Vaginal Microbiome : Current Understanding and Future Directions. J Infect Dis. 2016;3(Suppl 1):1–6.
14. Chacra LA, Fenollar F, Diop K. Bacterial Vaginosis : What Do We Currently Know ? Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2022;11(January):1–13.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.