PENERAPAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN DISCOVERY LEARNING UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KEAKTIFAN DAN PRESTASI BELAJAR PESERTA DIDIK PADA MATA PELAJARAN PENGANTAR ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN KELAS X ADMINISTRASI PERKANTORAN 3 SMK NEGERI 6 SURAKARTA TAHUN PELAJARAN 2014/2015

Abigail Josephine K, Hery Sawiji, Susantiningrum Susantiningrum

Abstract

The purpose of this research to know about Discovery
Learning Model can increase learning activeness and achievement in
“Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran” subject in the 10
th AP (Administrasi Perkantoran) 3 grade of SMK Negeri 6 Surakarta in the
school year of 2014/2015. This study is a classroom action research (CAR) that was conducted in 2 cycles. Each cycle consisted of 4 stages: (1) planning, (2) acting, (3) observing and interpreting, and (4) analyzing and reflecting. In those 4 stages, the teacher involve “Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran” subject and the 10 th AP 3 graders consisting of 32 students. Based on research that have been
done, it could be concluded that the application of Discovery Learning model to “Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran” subject could improve the students‟ learning activeness and learning achievement in the 10th AP 3 grade of SMK Negeri 6 of Surakarta in the school year of 2014/2015. It can be seen from the students‟
learning activeness and learning achievement improving continuously in cycle I and cycle II compare to pre-cycle stages. In pre-cycle, the students‟ activeness was 52,73% in visual activities, 48,44% in oral activities, 50,00% in writing activities, 50,78% in learning activities and 53,91% in mental activities aspect. Meanwhile
the learning achievement consisting of 3 domains could be elaborated as follows: (1) cognitive domain reached the mean class score of 71,69, (2) affective domain reached 50%, and (3) psychomotor reached 81,25%. In cycle I, the students‟ activeness improved to 63,67% in visual activities, 69,14% in oral activities, 75,00% in writing activities, 70,31% in listening activities, and 53,91% in
mental activities. In addition to activeness, the students‟ learning achievement consisting of 3 domains also improved. The mean class reached 75,25 for cognitive, 65,63% for affective, and 84,38% for psychomotor domains. Then, in cycle II, the students‟ activeness and learning achievement also improved. The first improvement was that of activeness in visual activities of 85,55%, oral activities of 80,86%, writing activities of 82,03%, listening activities of 82,42%, and mental activities of 83,59%. The second improvement was that of learning achievement consisting of 3 domains (1) cognitive domain with the mean class score of 82,69, (2) affective domain reached 100%, and (3) psychomotor domain reached 96,88%. From the result of research, it could be concluded that the application of Discovery Learning model to “Pengantar Administrasi Perkantoran” subject could improve the students‟ activeness and learning achievement in  the 10th AP 3 grade of SMK Negeri 6 of Surakarta in the school year of 2014/2015.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abura, G. O., Uside Noel, Barchok K. H. (2013). Effect Discovery Learning

Method on Secondary School Student’s Achievement in Physics In Kenya.

Vol. 2 No. 3 August 2013. Chuka University.

Ahmadi, Abu & Widodo Supriyono. (2004). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta. Aqib, Zainal. (2009). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Bandung: CV.

Yrama Widya.

Arifin, Zainal. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Arikunto, Suharsimi. (2006). Prosedur Penelitian. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Asrofudin. (2010). Berpartisipasi. Available at www.wikipedia.com (diunduh pada tanggal 10 Januari 2014).

Athoilah, Anton. (2010). Dasar-Dasar Manajemen. Bandung: PUSTAKA SETIA.

Atmosudirdjo. (2006). Hukum Administrasi Negara. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia.

Aunurrahman. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Bandung: Alfatbeta.

Badri, Munir Sukoco. (2007). Manajemen Administrasi dan Perkantoran Modern. Jakarta: Erlangga.

Balim, Ali Gunay. (2009). The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students’

Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Eurasian journal of education research, issue 35, spring 2009, 1-20.

Basrowi & Suwandi. (2008). Memahami Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

CHAN, Tak-Wai, YANG Euphony F.Y., LIAO Calvin C. Y., CHING Emily, &

CHANG Tian. (2010). The Effectiveness of Inductive Discovery Learning in

: 1 Mathematics Classroo. Proceedings of the 18th International

Conference on Computers in Education. Putrajaya, Malaysia: Asia-Pasific

Society for Computers in Education.

Dahar, Wilis Ratna. (2001). Teori-teori Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta:

Erlangga.

Depdiknas, (2001). Manajemen Peningkatan Mutu Berbasis Sekolah. Jakarta.

Dirjen Dikdasmen Direktorat SLTP.

Dimyati, dan Mudjiono. (2009). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Gie, The Liang. (2000). Administrasi Perkantoran Modern. Yogyakarta:

LIBERTY.

Gie, The Liang. (2001). Unsur-Unsur Administrasi Manajemen. Yogyakarta:

BPFEE.

Halamik, Prof. Dr. Oemar. (2008). Perencanaan Pengajaran Berdasarkan

Pendekatan Sistem. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.

Hamdani. (2011). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Tim Redaksi Pustaka Setia.

Hamid, Hamdani. (2013). Pengembangan Sistem Pendidikan di Indonesia.

Bandung: Pustaka Setia.

Haryadi Hendi. (2009). Administrasi Perkantoran untuk Manajer dan Staf. Jakarta Selatan: Transmedia Pustaka.

Hosnan. (2014). Pendekatan Saintifik dan Kontekstual dalam Pembelajaran Abad 21. Bogor: Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia.

Huitt. (2003). Motivation to Learn An Overview Educational Psychology

Interactive. Valdosta, State University. (diunduh pada tanggal 11 Januari

.

Kamulyan, M.S & Risminawati. (2012). ModelModel Pembelajaran Inovatif di Sekolah Dasar. Surakarta: FKIP UMS.

Meyer, M. 2010. A Logical view for Investigating dan initiating processes of discovering mathematical coherences. ZDM Mathematics Education. Vol. 74. No. 2.

Moleong, L.J. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT. Remaja

Rosdakarya.

Munawar, Indra. (2010). Pengertian dan Ciri-ciri Keberanian. Available at:

www.wikipedia.com (diunduh pada tanggal 10 Januari 2014).

Nasution, Faried. (2001). Psikologi Umum. Medan: IAIN Press. (diunduh pada tanggal 10 Januari 2014).

Nigro dan Nigro. (2010). Administrasi Negara dalam Pemerintahan. Seri

Terjemahan. Agus Martono. Edisi IV. Jakarta: Bina Aksara.

Nuraeni, Eni dan Dra. Kusdianti, Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Induktif untuk Mengajarkan Konsep Keanekaragaman Tumbuhan di SLTP dalam Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, Seminar Nasional Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA, Juli 2004.

Nurulwati.(2000). Pengertian Model Pembelajaran Menurut Para Ahli,

http://nezakhoirotunnisa.blogspot.com/2012/09/definisimetodmodelpembela jaran.html (diakses 9 Januari 2014).

Olubusuyi, M. Fajemidagba, Alex and Akanmu. (2013). Guided-discovery

Learning Strategy and Senior School Students Performance in Mathematics in Ejigbo, Nigeria. Vol. 4, No. 12. Departement of science education, faculty of education, university of ilorin, Nigeria.

Prayudi Atmosudirjo. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Teori Administrasi Publik. Agritek YPN Malang.

Rahayu, Yuli. (2013). Efektivitas Metode Pembelajaran Penemuan Terbimbing Melalui Pendekatan Open-Ended Terhadap Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep dan Penalaran Matematika Peserta Didik Kelas VIII Mts Ma’Arif Kaliwiro.

Rizkina Mera. (2013). Upaya Meningkatkan Keaktifan Siswa dalam Diskusi

Kelompok Melalui Layanan Bimbingan Kelompok Pada Siswa Kelas VIII E

di SMP Negeri 19 Semarang. Semarang: FKIP UNNES.

Robinson, Edwin M and Leffingwell William H. (1975). Text Book of Office

Management. TATA McGraw-HILL PUBLISHING COMPANY LTD. New Delhi.

Roestiyah N.K. (2008). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sardiman A.M. (2001). Interaksi dan Motivasi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sudjana, Nana. (2004). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo

Sugandi, Achmad, dkk. (2000).Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Semarang:IKIP

Sugiyono. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2012). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Cetakan ke-17. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sukmadinata, Nana Syaodih. (2008). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya.

Suparjati, D. (2000). Tata Usaha dan Kearsipan (Vol. I). Yogyakarta: Kanisius.

Suryosubroto. (2002). Proses Belajar Mengajar Di Sekolah. Jakarta: Rineka

Cipta.

Sutopo, HB. (2006).Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Surakarta: UNS Press.

Suyetty, R. Sri Endang dan Mulyani Sri. (2010). Modul Memahami Prinsip-

Prinsip Penyelenggaraan Administrasi Perkantoran. Jakarta: Erlangga

Syah, Muhibbin. (2004). Psikologi Pendidikan dengan Pendekatan Baru.

Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Syah, Muhibbin. (2013). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: PT. Raja Grafindo Persada

Thoha, Chabib. (2000). Kapita Selekta Pendidikan. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Tim Peneliti Universitas Udayana, Pengaruh Pola Asuh Orang Tua dan

Pengajaran dengan Metode Discovery-Inquiry Terhadap Konsep Diri serta

Hubungannya dengan Prestasi Belajar IPA siswa SMP Negeri di Propinsi

Bali, dalam Laporan Penelitian Fakultas Keguruan dan Ilmu Pendidikan,

Universitas Udayana, 1992, h.9

Tirtonegoro, Surtratinah. (2001). Penelitian Hasil Belajar Mengajar. Surabaya: Usaha Nasional.

Trianto. (2010). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif-Progesif. Jakarta:

Kencana. Universitas Sebelas Maret. (2012). Pedoman Penulisan Skripsi.

Surakarta: FKIP.

Warsita, Bambang. (2008). Teknologi Pembelajaran Landasan & Aplikasinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Widiantor, e. S. (2006). Wahana Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial 2 sd (Vol. II). Jakarta: Yudhistira.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.