Konsep Eco Green Park pada Taman Bungkul Surabaya dalam Mewujudkan Environmental Sustainability
Abstract
Bungkul Park as one of the green open spaces in Surabaya is known as the best city park locally and internationally. The implementation and management of the park's environment has improved and developed over time. The aim of this paper was to determine whether Bungkul Park Surabaya has been effective in the ecological function of city parks and the application of SDGs to Bungkul Park facilities. The research method used in this study is qualitative by observing the activities of Bungkul Park visitors and conducting literature studies. The results of this paper indicate that Bungkul Park Surabaya needs to apply the concept of a green park to the waste system, structuring street vendors, and landscaping to support the Sustainable Development Goals.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Buchel, S., & Frantzeskaki, N. (2015). Citizens’ voice: A case study about perceived ecosystem services by urban park users in Rotterdam, the Netherlands. Ecosystem Services, Vol. 12, 169-177.
Effendi, R., Salsabila, H., & Malik, A. (2018). Pemahaman Tentang Lingkungan Berkelanjutan. Modul, 18(2), 75-82.
Hussain, S. S., & Said, I. (2015). Knowledge Integration between Planning and Landscape Architecture in Contributing to a Better Open Space. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 170, 545-556.
Kim, G., & Coseo, P. (2018). Urban Park Systems to Support Sustainability: The Role of Urban Park Systems in Hot Arid Urban Climates. Forests, Vol. 9 (7).
Liu, H., Li, F., Xu, L., & Han, B. (2015). The impact of socio-demographic, environmental, and individual factors on urban park visitation in Beijing, China. Journal of Cleaner Production, Vol. 163, 181-188.
Malek, N. A., Mariapan, M., & Rahman, N. I. (2015). Community Participation in Quality Assessment for Green Open Spaces in Malaysia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 168, 219-228.
Mathers, A., Dempsey, N., & Molinc, J. F. (2015). Place-Keeping in Action: Evaluating the Capacity of Green Space Partnerships in England. Landscape and Urban Planning, Vol. 139, 126-136.
Nady, R. (2016). Towards Effective and Sustainable Urban Parks in Alexandria. Procedia Environmental Sciences, Vol. 34, 474-489.
Nastiti, F. N., & Giyarsih, S. R. (2019). Green Open Space in Urban Areas: A Case in The Government Office of Boyolali, Indonesia. Regional Science Inquiry, Vol. 11 (2).
Nugrahani, F. (2014). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif. Solo: Cakra Books.
Putri, A. N., & Nurini. (2014). Hubungan Tingkat Ketertarikan Masyarakat untuk Berkunjung dengan Kualitas Taman di Taman Menteri SUPENO. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 2(4).
Rochim, F. N., & Syahbana, J. A. (2013). Penetapan Fungsi dan Kesesuaian Vegetasi pada Taman Publik sebagai Ruang Terbuka Hijau (RTH) di Kota Pekalongan; Studi Kasus: Taman Monumen 45 Kota Pekalongan. Jurnal Teknik PWK, 3(4).
Shabak, M., Norouzi, N., Abdullah, A. M., & Khan, T. H. (2015). Children's Sense of Attachment to the Residential Common Open Space. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, Vol. 201, 39-48.
Sulistyo, B. W. (2012). Diferensiasi dan Redefinisi Ruang Terbuka Publik Kota melalui Pemaknaan Jiwa Tempat (Spirit of Place). IPTEK, 16(1).
Tse, M., Chau, C., Choy, Y., Tsui, W., Chan, C., & Tang, S. (2012). Perception of Urban Park Soundscape. The Journal of the Acoustical Society of Amerika, Vol. 131 (4), 2762-2771.
Uzhma, S. A., & Popi, P. (2015). Pemanfaatan Ruang Terbuka Publik oleh Pedagang Kaki Lima di Kawasan Alun Kapuas Kota Pontianak. Jurnal Arsitektur AGORA, 1(1), 26-35.
Wilhelm Stanis, S. A., Schneider, I. E., & Pereira, M. A. (2010). Parks and Health: Differences in Constraints and Negotiation Strategies for Park-Based Leisure Time Physical Activity by Stage of Change. Journal of Physical Activity and Health, Vol. 7, 273-284.