RESTORATIVE JUSTICE IN THE SETTLEMENT OF TRAFFIC ACCIDENT CAUSING DEATH TOLL ACCORDING TO THE PERSPECTIVE OF CUSTOMARY JUDICIARY IN SANGGAU DISTRICT, WEST KALIMANTAN

Marina Rona, Rachmad Safa’at, Abdul Madjid, Mohammad Fadli

Abstract

This research aims to examine restorative justice in the settlement of traffic accidents caused by the death toll from the customary judiciary perspective in Sanggau Regency, West Kalimantan. The fact of the field shows that a customary judiciary is an option for indigenous people to settle traffic accidents that resulted in the death according to  customary decision. The customary judicial process is led by Pomuntuh Adat with deliberation for consensus involving the perpetrators/drivers and heirs of his family and heirs of the victim's family. Adat decision by punishing perpetrators to repay or reinstate victims losses due to criminal acts sanctioned the customary verdict where the perpetrators/drivers and heirs of the family pay customary fines to the heirs of the victim's family and also perform customary rituals as a form of recovery of natural balance. The matter of traffic accident that has been decided through the customary judiciary, it is not processed through the process through the state's prejustice. The research is an empirical legal research, using secondary data through literature studies. Primary Data was obtained through interviews where the results concluded that the settlement of a traffic accident resulting in a death toll in a customary judicial perspective is a real manifestation of restorative justice

Keywords

Customary Judiciary; Adat Verdict Pati Nyawa, Restorative Justice

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abu Ahmadi. (1986). Antropologi Budaya: Mengenal Kebudayaan dan Suku-Suku Bangsa di Indonesia. Surabaya: Pelangi.

Achmad Ali and Wiwie Heryani. (2012). Menjelajahi Kajian Empiris terhadap Hukum. Jakarta: Pranadamedia Group.

Achmad Ali. (2009). Menguak Teori Hukum (Legal Theory) dan Teori Peradilan (Judicialprudence) Termasuk Interpretasi Undang-Undang (Legisprudence). Jakarta: Prenadamedia.

Bangir Manan (2009). Menegakkan Hukum Suatu Pencarian. Jakarta: Asosiasi advokad Indonesia-MMIX.

Dominikus Rato. (2015). Hukum Adat Kontemporer. Surabaya: LaksBang Justitia.

Derrida dalam Roger Cotterrel. (2001). Sociological Perspective on Law, England : Dartmouth Publishing Company and Ashagate Publishing Companny.

Hedar Laujeng. (2003). Mempertimbangkan Peradilan Adat: Seri Pengembangan Wacana. Jakarta: HuMa.

H.Abdurrahman dalam kumpulan tulisan. (2009). Mengenal Sistem Peradilan Adat 25 Sub Suku Dayak di Kabupaten Sanggau. Pontianak: Lembaga Bela Banua Talino.

Hilman Hadikusuma. (1984). Hukum Pidana Adat. Bandung: Alumni.

I Gusti Ketut Sutha. (1987). Bunga Rampai Beberapa Aspek Hukum Adat. Yogyakarta: Liberty.

I Made Widnyana. 2013. Hukum Pidana Adat Dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Fikahati Aneska.

I Nyoman Nurjaya.(2007). Reorientasi Paradigma Pembangunan Hukum Negara dalam Masyarakat Multikultul perspektif Antropologi Hukum, Pidato Pengukuhan Guru Besar Dalam Bidang Ilmu Hukum Pada Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya Malang,.

JJ Kusni. (1994). Dayak Membangun: Kasus Dayak Kalimantan Tengah, Universitas Michigan: SN.

J.F. Holleman. (1981). van Vollenhoven on Indonesian Adat Law: Selection from het Adatrecht van Nederlandsch-Indie.

J.U Lontaan. (1975). Sejarah-Hukum Adat dan Adat Istiadat Kalimantan Barat, Pontianak: Pemerintah Tingkat I kalbar.

John Rawls. (2006). Teori Keadilan. Yogyakarta : Pustaka Pelajar.

J.Pajar Widodo. (2013). Menjadi Hakim Progresif, Bandar Lampung: Indepth Publishing.

Leon Petrazycki. (1955). Law and Morality, Cambridge Massachusetts: Harvard University Press.

Lili Rasyidi and Ira Rasjidi. (2001). Dasar-dasar Filsafat Dan Teori Hukum, Bandung: Citra Aditya Bakti.

P. Yery OFM Cap. (2016). Adat Istiadat Orang Dayak Landak dan Tayan, Yogyakarta: Pohon Cahaya.

Mattew B. Miles and A. Mitchael Huberman. (1992). Analisis data kualitatif: Buku Sumber tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: UI Press.

Muchamad Munir. (1996). Penggunaan Pengadilan Negeri Sebagai Lembaga Untuk Menyelesaikan Sengketa Dalam Masyarakat. Surabaya: Unair..

M. Yahya Harahap. (2010). Pembahasan Permasalahan dan Penerapan KUHAP: Pemeriksaan Sidang pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, dan Peninjauan Kembali (edisi kedua). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Najicha, F. U., & Hermawan, S. (2019, October). Law in the Globalization and Its Influence on Economic Development and Environmental Preservation based on Pancasila and the Indonesian Constitution of 1945. In 3rd International Conference on Globalization of Law and Local Wisdom (ICGLOW 2019). Atlantis Press.

Noer Sidharta Effendi. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Perlindungan Hak Sosial Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Makalah pada Constitutional Law Festival di Universitas Brawijaya: Malang.

Rachmad Safa’at. (2013). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Pangan, Dari Ketahanan Pangan Ke kedaulatan Pangan. Malang: UB Press.

Sudikno Mertokusumo. (1991). Mengenal Hukum Suatu pengantar, Yogyakarta: Liberty.

Suteki. (2010). Rekonstruksi Politik Hukum Hak As Air Pro Rakyat. Malang : Surya Pena Gemilang.

The Liang Gie. (1972). Teori-Teori Keadilan : Sumbangan Bahan Untuk Pemahaman Pancaslla. Yogyakarta : Super.

Tejomurti, K. (2018). Memberdayakan Koperasi Sampah Berbasis Otonomi Desa Dalam Mewujudkan Desa Ramah Lingkungan dan Berkelanjutan. Law Review, 17(3), 272-296.

Valentinus. (1997). Kehormatan Menurut Dayak Mualang dalam Perspektif Kehormatan Katolik, Tesis, STFT Widya Sasana: Malang.

Van Apeldorn. (1958). Pengantar Ilmu Hukum, Jakarta : Noorhoff-kol NV.

Noor Sidharta Effendi. (2016). Mahkamah Konstitusi Dan Perlindungan Hak Sosial Masyarakat Hukum Adat, Makalah pada Constitutional Law Festival di Universitas Brawijaya, 7 Oktober 2016.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v9i1.39351

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.