PERILAKU KECURANGAN AKADEMIK DARI PERSPEKTIF THE FRAUD TRIANGLE THEORY (STUDI EMPIRIS MAHASISWA FKIP UNIVERSITAS X)
Abstract
ABSTRACT
The aims of this research to determine correlation between : 1) pressure with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; 2) opportunity with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; 3) rasionalization and academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; dan 4) pressure, oppurtunity, and rasionalization with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student. This is a quantitative research with ex post facto type. The subjects of this research is FKIP X University student in 2016 group at A, B, and C department with population as many as 202 student. The samples is 134 respondend. Sampling method is proportional random sampling. Data collection method is observation, and questionnaire. The result showed that there was a positive and significant correlation between 1) pressure with academic dishonesty correlation that proven by correlation coefficient 0,195 and p-value 0,024 (< 0,05); 2) opportunity with academic dishonesty that proven by correlation coefficient 0,228 and p-value 0,008 (< 0,05); 3) rasionalization and academic dishonesty that proven by correlation coefficient 0,667 and p-value 0,000 (< 0,05); 4) pressure, oppurtunity, and rasionalization with academic dishonesty that proven by multiple correlation coefficient (R) 0,683, and result of p-value in simultaneous test (F-test) 0,000 (< 0,05).
Keywords : pressure, oppurtunity, rasionalization, the fraud tringle theory, academic cheating
ABSTRAK
Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji hubungan antara tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa FKIP Universitas X baik secara parsial maupun simultan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa angkatan 2016 pada Program Studi A, B, dan C dengan jumlah populasi sebanyak 202 mahasiswa. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 134 responden yang diambil dengan teknik proportional random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi dan kuesioner. Validitas data menggunakan teknik validitas konstruk. Teknik analisis data terdiri dari analisis statistik deskriptif, dan uji hipotesis, yang meliputi analisis regresi ganda, analisis korelasi, dan uji simultan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan antara: 1) tekanan dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan koefisien korelasi senilai 0,195 dan p-value sebesar 0,024 (< 0,05); 2) peluang dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan nilai p-value sebesar koefisien korelasi senilai 0,228 dan p-value sebesar 0,008 (< 0,05); 3) rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan koefisien korelasi senilai 0,667 dan p-value 0,000 (< 0,05); 4) tekanan, peluang, dan rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan melalui uji korelasi ganda diperoleh koefisien (R) sebesar 0,683, dan hasil p-value pada uji simultan (uji F) sebesar 0,000 (< 0,05).
Kata Kunci : tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi, the fraud tringle theory, kecurangan akademik
Full Text:
PDFReferences
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). The Fraud
Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond
Theory : Understanding The Convergent
and Divergent For Future Research.
International Journal Academic Research In
Accounting Finance and Management
Science, 7 (28), 30 – 37
Albrecht W.S., Albrecht, C.O., Albrecht, C.C.,
& Zimbelman. M.F . (2012). Fraud
Examination, Third Edition. South
Western : Cengage
Alhadza, A. (2001). Masalah Menyontek
(Cheating) di Dunia Pendidikan. Jakarta :
Depdiknas
Apriani, N., Sujana, E., & Sulindawati, I. (2017).
Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity,dan
Rationalization terhadap Perilaku
Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris :
Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1
Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). Jurnal S1
Akuntansi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 7(1), 1–12.
BBC. (2012, 30 Agustus). Harvard Univerity
probes mass exam “cheating”. Diperoleh
pada 31 Maret 2018 dari https: https://
www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada 19432240
Becker, D., Coonoly, Paula L, & Morrison, J.
(2006). Using the Business Fraud Triangle
to Predict Accademic Dishonesty Among
Business Students. Academic Educational
Leadership Journal, 10 (1), 37 – 56
Bolin. (2004). Self-Control, Perceived
Opportunity, and Attitudes as Predictors of
Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of
Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied,
(2) : 101-114.
Colby. (2006). Cheating : What Is It (Versi
Elektronik). Diperoleh pada 9 November
dari http://class.asu.edu/files/Al%
Flier.pdf
Ercegovac Z, & Richardson Jr. JV. (2004).
Academic Dishonesty, Plagiarism Included,
in the Digital Age: A Literature Review.
College and Reaserch Library, 65 (4), 301-
Fitriana, A., Baridwan, Z. (2012). Perilaku
Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa
Akuntansi : Dimensi Fraud Triangle. Jurnal
Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 3 (2), 161 – 331
Hendricks, B. (2004). Academic Dishonesty : A
Study in The Magnitude of and Justification
for Academic Dishonesty Among College
Undergreduate and Graduate Student.
Journal of College Student Development, 35
(3), 212 – 260
Lin, C.H.S., & We, L.M. (2007). Academic
Dishonesty in Higher Education Nationwide Study in Taiwan. Higher
Educational Journal, 54 (1), 85-97.
Muhsin, Kardoyo, Arief. S., Nurkhin, A., &
Pramusito, H. (2017). An Analyis of
Student’s Academic Fraud Behavior.
Advances in Social Science, Education and
Humanities Research, 164, 34-38
Muhsin, Kardoyo, & Nurkhin, A, (2018). What
Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior?
From Fraud Triangle to Fraud Pentagon
Perspective. International Conference on
Economics, Business and Economic
Education 2018, KnE Social Sciences, hlm
–167. Semarang : Universitas Negeri
Semarang
Munirah, A., & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Pengaruh
Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond Dan Gone
Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik.
Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7
(1), 120 – 139
Nursani, R., and Irianto, G. (2014). Perilaku
Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa:
Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Ilmiah
Mahasiswa FEB, 2 (2)
Olejnik, S. N. & Holschuh, J. P. (2007). College
rules! 2nd Edition How to study, survive,
and succeed. New York: Ten Speed Press.
Prawira, I., dan Irianto, G. (2015). Analisis
Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond terhadap
Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa
(Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa S1 Jurusan
Akuntansi Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Kota
Malang). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 3
(2)
Purnamasari, D., & Irianto, G. (2013). Analisis
Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle terhadap
Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa
pada Saat Ujian dan Metode
Pencegahannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa
FEB UB, 2(2) : 1–25.
Undang – Undang No. 12 tahun 2012 tentang
Pendidikan Tinggi
Utari, R. (2017). Taksonomi Bloom : Apa dan
Bagaimana Menggunakannya? (versi
elektronik). Jakarta : Pusdiklat KNPK
(Diunduh pada 30 Maret 2019)
Whitley, B.E., & Spiegel, P.K. (2002).
Academic Dishonessty : an Educator’s
Guide. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum
Associates Inc. Publicher.
Williams, M.S., & Hosek, W.R. (2003).
Strategies for reducing academic
dishonesty. Journal of Legal Studies
Education, 21 (1), 87 – 107
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.