PERILAKU KECURANGAN AKADEMIK DARI PERSPEKTIF THE FRAUD TRIANGLE THEORY (STUDI EMPIRIS MAHASISWA FKIP UNIVERSITAS X)

Parikesit Pranagita ., Ngadiman . ., Jaryanto . .

Abstract

ABSTRACT

The aims of this research to determine correlation between : 1) pressure with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; 2) opportunity with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; 3) rasionalization and academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student; dan 4) pressure, oppurtunity, and rasionalization with academic dishonesty in FKIP X University student. This is a quantitative research with ex post facto type. The subjects of this research is FKIP X University student in 2016 group at A, B, and C department with population as many as 202 student. The samples is 134 respondend. Sampling method is proportional random sampling. Data collection method is observation, and questionnaire. The result showed that there was a positive and significant correlation between 1) pressure with academic dishonesty correlation that proven by correlation coefficient 0,195 and p-value 0,024 (< 0,05); 2) opportunity with academic dishonesty that proven by correlation coefficient 0,228 and p-value 0,008 (< 0,05); 3) rasionalization and academic dishonesty that proven by correlation coefficient 0,667 and p-value 0,000 (< 0,05); 4) pressure, oppurtunity, and rasionalization with academic dishonesty that proven by multiple correlation coefficient (R) 0,683, and result of p-value in simultaneous test (F-test) 0,000 (< 0,05).
Keywords : pressure, oppurtunity, rasionalization, the fraud tringle theory, academic cheating

ABSTRAK

Tujuan penelitian ini untuk menguji hubungan antara tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik pada mahasiswa FKIP Universitas X baik secara parsial maupun simultan. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif. Subjek penelitian ini adalah mahasiswa angkatan 2016 pada Program Studi A, B, dan C dengan jumlah populasi sebanyak 202 mahasiswa. Jumlah sampel sebanyak 134 responden yang diambil dengan teknik proportional random sampling. Teknik pengumpulan data yang digunakan adalah observasi dan kuesioner. Validitas data menggunakan teknik validitas konstruk. Teknik analisis data terdiri dari analisis statistik deskriptif, dan uji hipotesis, yang meliputi analisis regresi ganda, analisis korelasi, dan uji simultan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan terdapat hubungan positif dan signifikan antara: 1) tekanan dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan koefisien korelasi senilai 0,195 dan p-value sebesar 0,024 (< 0,05); 2) peluang dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan nilai p-value sebesar koefisien korelasi senilai 0,228 dan p-value sebesar 0,008 (< 0,05); 3) rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan dengan koefisien korelasi senilai 0,667 dan p-value 0,000 (< 0,05); 4) tekanan, peluang, dan rasionalisasi dengan kecurangan akademik dibuktikan melalui uji korelasi ganda diperoleh koefisien (R) sebesar 0,683, dan hasil p-value pada uji simultan (uji F) sebesar 0,000 (< 0,05).
Kata Kunci : tekanan, peluang, rasionalisasi, the fraud tringle theory, kecurangan akademik

Full Text:

PDF

References

DAFTAR PUSTAKA

Abdullahi, R., & Mansor, N. (2015). The Fraud

Triangle Theory and Fraud Diamond

Theory : Understanding The Convergent

and Divergent For Future Research.

International Journal Academic Research In

Accounting Finance and Management

Science, 7 (28), 30 – 37

Albrecht W.S., Albrecht, C.O., Albrecht, C.C.,

& Zimbelman. M.F . (2012). Fraud

Examination, Third Edition. South

Western : Cengage

Alhadza, A. (2001). Masalah Menyontek

(Cheating) di Dunia Pendidikan. Jakarta :

Depdiknas

Apriani, N., Sujana, E., & Sulindawati, I. (2017).

Pengaruh Pressure, Opportunity,dan

Rationalization terhadap Perilaku

Kecurangan Akademik (Studi Empiris :

Mahasiswa Akuntansi Program S1

Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha). Jurnal S1

Akuntansi Universitas Pendidikan Ganesha, 7(1), 1–12.

BBC. (2012, 30 Agustus). Harvard Univerity

probes mass exam “cheating”. Diperoleh

pada 31 Maret 2018 dari https: https://

www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada 19432240

Becker, D., Coonoly, Paula L, & Morrison, J.

(2006). Using the Business Fraud Triangle

to Predict Accademic Dishonesty Among

Business Students. Academic Educational

Leadership Journal, 10 (1), 37 – 56

Bolin. (2004). Self-Control, Perceived

Opportunity, and Attitudes as Predictors of

Academic Dishonesty. The Journal of

Psychology Interdisciplinary and Applied,

(2) : 101-114.

Colby. (2006). Cheating : What Is It (Versi

Elektronik). Diperoleh pada 9 November

dari http://class.asu.edu/files/Al%

Flier.pdf

Ercegovac Z, & Richardson Jr. JV. (2004).

Academic Dishonesty, Plagiarism Included,

in the Digital Age: A Literature Review.

College and Reaserch Library, 65 (4), 301-

Fitriana, A., Baridwan, Z. (2012). Perilaku

Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa

Akuntansi : Dimensi Fraud Triangle. Jurnal

Akuntansi Multiparadigma, 3 (2), 161 – 331

Hendricks, B. (2004). Academic Dishonesty : A

Study in The Magnitude of and Justification

for Academic Dishonesty Among College

Undergreduate and Graduate Student.

Journal of College Student Development, 35

(3), 212 – 260

Lin, C.H.S., & We, L.M. (2007). Academic

Dishonesty in Higher Education Nationwide Study in Taiwan. Higher

Educational Journal, 54 (1), 85-97.

Muhsin, Kardoyo, Arief. S., Nurkhin, A., &

Pramusito, H. (2017). An Analyis of

Student’s Academic Fraud Behavior.

Advances in Social Science, Education and

Humanities Research, 164, 34-38

Muhsin, Kardoyo, & Nurkhin, A, (2018). What

Determinants of Academic Fraud Behavior?

From Fraud Triangle to Fraud Pentagon

Perspective. International Conference on

Economics, Business and Economic

Education 2018, KnE Social Sciences, hlm

–167. Semarang : Universitas Negeri

Semarang

Munirah, A., & Nurkhin, A. (2018). Pengaruh

Faktor-Faktor Fraud Diamond Dan Gone

Theory Terhadap Kecurangan Akademik.

Economic Education Analysis Journal, 7

(1), 120 – 139

Nursani, R., and Irianto, G. (2014). Perilaku

Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa:

Dimensi Fraud Diamond. Jurnal Ilmiah

Mahasiswa FEB, 2 (2)

Olejnik, S. N. & Holschuh, J. P. (2007). College

rules! 2nd Edition How to study, survive,

and succeed. New York: Ten Speed Press.

Prawira, I., dan Irianto, G. (2015). Analisis

Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Diamond terhadap

Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa

(Studi Kasus pada Mahasiswa S1 Jurusan

Akuntansi Perguruan Tinggi Negeri Kota

Malang). Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa FEB, 3

(2)

Purnamasari, D., & Irianto, G. (2013). Analisis

Pengaruh Dimensi Fraud Triangle terhadap

Perilaku Kecurangan Akademik Mahasiswa

pada Saat Ujian dan Metode

Pencegahannya. Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa

FEB UB, 2(2) : 1–25.

Undang – Undang No. 12 tahun 2012 tentang

Pendidikan Tinggi

Utari, R. (2017). Taksonomi Bloom : Apa dan

Bagaimana Menggunakannya? (versi

elektronik). Jakarta : Pusdiklat KNPK

(Diunduh pada 30 Maret 2019)

Whitley, B.E., & Spiegel, P.K. (2002).

Academic Dishonessty : an Educator’s

Guide. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum

Associates Inc. Publicher.

Williams, M.S., & Hosek, W.R. (2003).

Strategies for reducing academic

dishonesty. Journal of Legal Studies

Education, 21 (1), 87 – 107

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.