Fenomena Kepemimpinan Karismatis di Era Transisi Menuju Demokrasi Pasca Reformasi

Budhy Prianto

Abstract

Although Max Weber's three typologies of authority, namely traditional authority, charismatic authority, and rational-legal authority have been classified as a classical theory, they are still considered relevant and referred to by academics for various scientific purposes. Also in daily socio-political practices in Indonesian society today, the phenomenon of life can be found in three typologies of authority. Simultaneously, the three typologies of authority can be found at the community level, state level, and in the relationship between society and the state. However, in the current era of democratic governance, the use and acceptance of these three types of authority cannot be avoided from criticism and controversy, especially those related to charismatic authority. There is a tendency for the development –or redevelopment – of charismatic leadership to be felt in recent years. Many leaders and figures who feel that they are leaders deliberately equip themselves with a mythical aura, or mystical, in order to boost their personal charismatic authority, in order to legitimize their power and influence. By using literature research and content analysis, this paper tries to find answers on how to manage the tendency of charismatic leadership types to be in line with democratic governance values that are currently being developed. The results of the study show that there are two ways to synergize charismatic authority with demands for democratic governance. On the one hand, carry out the process of demystifying charisma, and on the other hand, continue to encourage the development of procedural and substantial democratic values.

Keywords

charisma; charismatic leadership; demystification; democracy; authority

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amal, M. K. (2015). Islam dan Nation-State: Memetakan kembali pergulatan ideologi kebangsaan Islam Indonesia. In A. Taufiq, A. F. Hadi, & A. Anwar (Eds.), Reaktualisasi Pancasila: Menyoal identitas, globalisasi, dan diskursus negara-bangsa. Ombak, Yogyakarta (pp. 350–372). Penerbit Ombak.

Anderson, B. R. O. (1984). Gagasan tentang Kekuasaan dalam Kebudayaan Jawa. In M. Budiarjo (Ed.), Aneka Pemikiran Tentang Kuasa dan Wibawa, Jakarta, Penerbit Sinar Harapan: Vol. x. Sinar Harapan.

Ariyanto, B. (2016). Desentralisasi Pengelolaan Partai Politik (Upaya Penataan Kelembagaan Partai Politik Menuju Partai Modern). In F. Amsari, C. Simabura, K. Fahmi, & M. N. Fajri (Eds.), PROSIDING KONFERENSI NASIONAL HUKUM TATA NEGARA Ke-3 “DEMOKRATISASI PARTAI POLITIK DI INDONESIA” Padang-Bukittinggi, 5-8 September 2016 (pp. 685–700). Pusat Studi Konstitusi (PUSaKO) Fakultas Hukum Universitas Andalas.

Arrifai, F. B. (2021, June 6). Mengulas Secara Singkat Kepemimpinan Joko Widodo. Kumparan.Com. https://kumparan.com/fatimah-badri/mengulas-secara-singkat-kepemimpinan-joko-widodo-1vsAdOp9C0A

Barowi, A. (2017). Barowi, "SERAT PAMORING KAWULA GUSTI Perwujudan Islam Kejawen,. Sabda: Jurnal Kajian Kebudayaan, 3(2).

Borgatta, E. F., & Montgomery, R. J. V. (2000). Encyclopedia of Sociology (2nd ed., Vol. 1). Macmillan Reference.

BREUILLY, J. (2011). Max Weber, charisma and nationalist leadership1. Nations and Nationalism, 17(3), 477–499. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8129.2011.00487.x

Budiatri, A. P., Haris, S., Romli, L., Nuryanti, S., Nurhasim, Moch., Amalia, S., Darmawan, D., & Hanafi, R. I. (2018). Personalisasi partai politik di Indonesia era reformasi. Jurnal Penelitian Politik, 14(2).

Collin, P. H. (2004). Dictionary of Politics and Government (third). Bloomsbury.

Vocabulary. (n.d.). Vocabulary.Com. Retrieved August 16, 2023, from https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/demystify

Eatwell, R. (2006). The Concept and Theory of Charismatic Leadership. Totalitarian Movements and Political Religions, 7(2), 141–156. https://doi.org/10.1080/14690760600642156

Harwood, T. G., & Garry, T. (2003). An Overview of Content Analysis. The Marketing Review, 3(4), 479–498. https://doi.org/10.1362/146934703771910080

Hermawan, I. C. (2020). Implementasi Pendidikan Politik Pada Partai Politik di Indonesia. . . Jurnal Pendidikan Politik, Hukum Dan Kewarganegaraan, 10(1).

Jannah, H. (2015). Kyai, Perubahan Sosial dan Dinamika Politik Kekuasaan. Fikrah, 3(1).

Kadir, A. G. (2014). Dinamika Partai Politik Di Indonesia. Sosiohumaniora, 16(2), 132–136.

Koentjaraningrat. (1980). Beberapa Pokok Antropologi Sosial. PT Dian Rakyat.

McNabb, D. E. (2015). Research Methods in Public Administration and Nonprofit Management. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315701127

Mills, C. W., & Horowitz, I. L. (1967). Power, politics and people: The collected essays of C. Wright Mills. Oxford University Press.

Mulder, N. (1994). The Ideology of Javanese-Indonesian Leadership. In H. Antlöv & S. Cederroth (Eds.), Leadership On Java, Gentle Hints, Authoritarian Rule. Routledge.

Murtiana, E. (2017). Model Kepemimpinan Karismatik Susilo Bambang Yudhoyono dalam Partai Demokrat [Bachelor Thesis]. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Islam Negeri Syarif Hidayatullah.

Mustafa, H. (2011). Kepemimpinan karismatik: studi tentang kepemimpinan politik Megawati Soekarno Putri dalam partai demokrasi Indonesia perjuangan [Bachelor Thesis]. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial Dan Ilmu Politik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Pappas, T. S. (2011). Political Charisma Revisited, and Reclaimed for Political Science (2011/60; EUI RSCAS ).

Pappas, T. S. (2016). Are Populist Leaders “Charismatic”? The Evidence from Europe. Constellations, 23(3), 378–390. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8675.12233

Prianto, B. (2011). Rekrutmen Kepemimpinan Sektor Publik di Daerah: Problem Internal Partai Politik. Kalamsiasi: Jurnal Ilmu Komunikasi Dan Ilmu Administrasi Negara, 4(2), 155–172.

Prianto, B. (2016). PARTAI POLITIK, FENOMENA DINASTI POLITIK DALAM PEMILIHAN KEPALA DAERAH, DAN DESENTRALISASI. Publisia: Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 1(2). https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v1i2.436

Qori, H. I. L. A. (2013). Kepemimpinan karismatik versus kepemimpinan transformasional. Jurnal Analisa, 1(2), 70–77.

Ridoi, M. (2016). Kekuatan figur dalam partai politik (studi terhadap Abdurrahman Wahid di Partai Kebangkitan Bangsa) [Bachelor Thesis]. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik UIN Syarif Hidayatullah.

Rozaki, A. (2021). Menabur Karisma, Menuai Kuasa. IRCiSoD.

Sanusi, H. A. (2009). Relasi antara korupsi dan kekuasaan. Jurnal Konstitusi, 6(2), 83–104.

Shadily, H. (1992). Ensiklopiedi Indonesia (H. Shadily, Ed.). Ichtiar Baru-Van Hove.

Siswanto, D. (2010). Pengaruh pandangan hidup masyarakat Jawa terhadap model kepemimpinan (tinjauan filsafat sosial). Jurnal Filsafat, 20(3), 197–216.

Slamet-Velsink. (1004). Traditional Leadership in Rural Java. In Leadership On Java, Gentle Hints, Authoritarian Rule (pp. 576–589). Curzon Press Ltd.

Solahudin. (2001). Amuk Massa Gus Dur: Laporan Kekerasan terhadap Jurnalis dan Media Massa Mei 2000-April 2001. AJI Indonesia.

The Britannica Dictionary. (n.d.). Retrieved August 2, 2023, from https://www.britannica.com/dictionary/demystify

The Editors of the Webster’s New World Dictionaries. (2004). Webster’s New World College Dictionary (fourth). Webster’s New World.

Thohari, H. Y. (2018). Sistem kekuasaan dan pemerintahan kuno; kajian aspek budaya. . 10, 39–60.

Thohari, H. Y. (2020, November 19). Kepemimpinan Karismatis: Bukan Masa Depan. Suara Muhammadiya. https://web.suaramuhammadiyah.id/2020/11/19/kepemimpinan-karismatis-bukan-masa-depan/

van Dick, R., Fink, L., Steffens, N. K., Peters, K., & Haslam, S. A. (2019). Attributions of leaders’ charisma increase after their death: The mediating role of identity leadership and identity fusion. Leadership, 15(5), 576–589. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742715018807042

WILLNER, A. R. (1984). The Spellbinders. Yale University Press. https://doi.org/10.2307/j.ctt1ww3w19

Windisari, Y., & Wahyuliana, I. (2022). Tahta Extended Family Dalam Bias Politik Kekerabatan. Jurnal Pamator : Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Trunojoyo, 15(1), 53–65. https://doi.org/10.21107/pamator.v15i1.13089

YILMAZ, V., & TELSAÇ, C. (2021). AUTHORITY AND BUREAUCRACY FROM WEBER’S PERSPECTIVE. Mehmet Akif Ersoy Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 34, 42–52. https://doi.org/10.20875/makusobed.903546

Yudi, L. (2010). Indonesia Masih Kemarau Calon Pemimpin. Inilah.Com.

Yunas, N. S. (2016). Kepemimpinan Dan Masa Depan Reformasi Birokrasi Di Indonesia. Dimensi Journal of Sociology, 9(2), 103–114.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/sp.v18i2.78534

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.