Beyond Digital Efficiency: Reconstructing Public Value Through Citizen Satisfaction in Adaptive Governance
Abstract
Digital transformation in public administration is often claimed to generate public value, yet its linking mechanisms remain contested. This study proposes the Public Value Mediation Model in Digital Service Transformation, positioning citizen satisfaction as a transmission mechanism between technological improvements and the formation of perceived public value, as a conceptual contribution to the adaptive governance paradigm, in which adaptivity indicators are operationalized through service responsiveness and flexibility. Departing from Moore's (1995) normative approach, this study operationalizes public value as citizens' subjective assessments of service quality. The study employs an explanatory quantitative design, using a survey of 220 digital service users in Malang City, selected to represent a mid-sized city with measurable digital divides, relevant for testing the limits of digital efficiency claims under uneven infrastructure conditions, with 27 five-point Likert items. The dependent variable is operationalized as a composite public value score. Analysis employs Ordinal Logistic Regression; mediation was tested using the Sobel test, chosen for its suitability with ordinal data, despite its sensitivity limitations compared to bootstrapping. Results show that accessibility (β=0.298, p<0.01) and response speed (β=0.314, p<0.001) significantly enhance satisfaction, which in turn strengthens public value (β=0.382, p<0.001), with 40% partial mediation (Nagelkerke R²=0.642). Critical finding: participation dimensions consistently scored lower than efficiency, indicating a significant efficiency–participation trade-off evidence that digitalization has yet to expand the democratic space of public services. Technological innovation does not automatically generate public value without meaningful citizen experience and attention to the digital divide.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adni, M., Rusadi, B., & Baharuddin, Y. (2024). Adaptive policy in website-based digitization of government public services. Logos: Jurnal Ilmiah, 18(2), 145-159. https://doi.org/10.22219/logos.v7i1.29404
Agresti, A. (2018). An introduction to categorical data analysis (3rd ed.). Wiley.
Ahram, T., & Falcão, C. (Eds.). (2018). Advances in usability and user experience: Proceedings of the AHFE 2017 International Conference on Usability and User Experience, July 17-21, 2017, Los Angeles, California, USA (Vol. 607). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-60492-3
Alzahrani, L., Al-Karaghouli, W., & Weerakkody, V. (2018). Investigating the impact of citizens' trust toward the successful adoption of e-government: A multigroup analysis of gender, age, and internet experience. Information Systems Management, 35(2), 124-146. https://doi.org/10.1080/10580530.2018.1440730
Ansell, C., & Trondal, J. (2018). Governing turbulence: An organizational-institutional agenda. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 1(1), 43-57. https://doi.org/10.1093/ppmgov/gvx013
Badan Pusat Statistik Kota Malang. (2024). Malang Municipality in Figures 2024 (No. Publikasi 35730.24003). BPS-Statistics of Malang Municipality.
BPS-Badan Pusat Statistik. (2025, Januari 14). Penduduk usia 15+ menurut pendidikan dan kegiatan, 2008–2024. Statistik BPS.
Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2022). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approach (6th ed.). SAGE Publications.
Dewi, L. P. R. S., & Suardana, I. B. R. (2023). Reflections of agile governance in public services in the digital age. Publisia Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, 8(1), 84-90. https://doi.org/10.26905/pjiap.v8i1.9154
Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2022). Primer on partial least squares structural equation modeling (PLS-SEM) (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.
Heeks, R., & Shekhar, S. (2019). Datafication, development and marginalised urban communities: An applied data justice framework. Information, Communication & Society, 22(7), 992-1011. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2019.1599039
Ju, J., Liu, L., & Feng, Y. (2019). Public and private value in citizen participation in e-governance: Evidence from a government-sponsored green commuting platform. Government Information Quarterly, 36(4), Article 101400. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.101400
Kim, S., & Lee, J. (2012). E-participation, transparency, and trust in local government. Public Administration Review, 72(6), 819-828. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6210.2012.02613.x
Manoharan, A. P., Melitski, J., & Holzer, M. (2023). Digital governance: An assessment of performance and best practices. Public Organization Review, 23(2), 265-283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11115-021-00584-8
Meijer, A. J., Curtin, D., & Hillebrandt, M. (2012). Open government: Connecting vision and voice. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 78(1), 7-20. https://doi.org/10.1177/0020852311429533
Moore, M. H. (1995). Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard University Press.
Twizeyimana, J. D., & Andersson, A. (2019). The public value of e-government: A literature review. Government Information Quarterly, 36(2), 167-178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2019.01.001
United Nations Department of Economic and Social Affairs. (2023). UN e-government survey 2023: The future of digital government. United Nations.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.46.2.186.11926
Wang, C., Teo, T. S. H., Dwivedi, Y., & Janssen, M. (2021). Mobile services use and citizen satisfaction in government: Integrating social benefits and uses and gratifications theory. Information Technology & People, 34(4), 1313-1337. https://doi.org/10.1108/ITP-02-2020-0097
Zuiderwijk, A., Janssen, M., & Dwivedi, Y. K. (2015). Acceptance and use predictors of open data technologies: Drawing upon the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology. Government Information Quarterly, 32(4), 429-440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.giq.2015.08.003.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.










