Perceptions of Village-Owned Enterprise Managers on The Use of QRIS As A Digital Payment Instrument

Kristina Setyowati; Sri Maryuni; Septyanto Galan Prakoso

doi:10.20961/sp.v20i1.101490

Perceptions of Village-Owned Enterprise Managers on The Use of QRIS As A Digital Payment Instrument

Kristina Setyowati, Sri Maryuni, Septyanto Galan Prakoso

Abstract

Technology development impacts all aspects of people's lives. Increasingly complex needs cause the choice of digital technology. Advances in technology and information also contribute to the development of the digital economy including the development of digital payment systems using QRIS among business managers and the community. This study aims to determine the perception of BUMDes managers in using the Quick Response Indonesian Standard (QRIS). The results showed that BUMDes managers consider QRIS very useful for the transaction process. Judging from the perception of convenience and flexibility, they feel that using QRIS is easier, practical, and flexible. Although there are some barriers related to internet networks or quotas that result in less stability and lack of interest in using QRIS. The suggestion given is the need to increase the diffusion of innovation (socialization or counseling) about QRIS to increase awareness.

Keywords

BUMDes management; Digital transactions; QRIS

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ardana, S. G., Luqyana, A. S., Antono, I. L., Rahayu, R. P., Qonita, L., Zahra, S. A., & Alsyahdat, F. (2023). Efektivitas penggunaan QRIS bagi kalangan mahasiswa UNNES untuk transaksi pembayaran dalam rangka mendorong perkembangan ekonomi pada era digitalisasi. Jurnal Potensial, 2(2), 167–183.
Ardiana, D. P. Y., Welda, Pramawati, I. D., A. A. T., Suandana, N. P. W. (2021). Technology Acceptance Model for evaluating the use of the Indonesian Standard Quick Response Code (QRIS): A case study of MSMEs in Bali. Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on New Media Studies (CONMEDIA 2021).
Astori, M. (2007). Psikologi pembelajaran. CV Wacana Prima.
Azzahroo, R. A., & Estiningrum, S. D. (2021). Preferensi mahasiswa dalam menggunakan Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS) sebagai teknologi pembayaran. Jurnal Manajemen Motivasi, 17(1), 10.
Christian, M., Yulita, H., Sander, O. A., Arifin, P. (2024). The use of Quick Response Code Indonesian Standard (QRIS) in Jakarta: Are usefulness and resistance to technology stronger than perceived security and technological anxiety? Lecture Notes in Networks and Systems.
Danuri, M. (2019). Perkembangan dan transformasi teknologi digital. Jurnal Ilmiah INFOKAM, 15(2).
Djoyo, B. W., Nurzaqia, S., Budiarti, S. I., & Agustin, S. (2022). Examining the determinant factors of intention to use of Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS) as a payment system for MSME merchants. Proceedings of the 2022 International Conference on Information Management and Technology (ICIMTech).
Ersaningtyas, A. P. (2019). Analisis pengaruh persepsi kemudahan, persepsi risiko dan kualitas informasi terhadap minat menggunakan rekening bersama Shopee (Studi kasus pada mahasiswa Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Politik Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jawa Timur). Jurnal Bisnis Indonesia, 10(2).
Featherman, M. S., & Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Predicting e-services adoption: A perceived risk facets perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, 59(4), 451–474. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1071-5819(03)00111-3
Nenandha, N. (2020). The influence of perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and perceived risk in using digital payment services in accounting students. Jurnal Ekonomi Trisakti, 2(2), 611–676. https://doi.org/10.25105/jet.v2i2.14635
Ningsih, H. A., Sasmita, E. M., & Sari, B. (2021). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, dan persepsi risiko terhadap keputusan menggunakan uang elektronik (QRIS) pada mahasiswa. Jurnal IKRA-ITH Ekonomi, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.37817/ikraith-ekonomika.v4i1
Paramitha, D. A., & Kusumaningtyas, D. (2020). QRIS. Fakultas Ekonomi, Universitas Nusantara PGRI Kediri.
Parastiti, D. E., Mukhlis, I., & Haryono, A. (2015). Analisis penggunaan uang elektronik pada mahasiswa Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Negeri Malang (Studi kasus: Uang elektronik BRIZZI). Jurnal Ekonomi dan Studi Pembangunan, 7(1), 75–82.
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 69–103.
Priambodo, S., & Prabawani, B. (2016). Pengaruh persepsi manfaat, persepsi kemudahan penggunaan, dan persepsi risiko terhadap minat menggunakan layanan uang elektronik (studi kasus pada masyarakat di kota Semarang). Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Bisnis, 5(2), 127–135.
Prihandoko, D., Hamsal, M., Sundjaja, A. M., & Gunadi, W. (2024). The mediating effect of digital payment tools in the relationship between digitalization and use of technology to increase sales on MSMEs. Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Technology Innovation and Its Applications (ICTIIA 2024).
Rahayu, A., & Zaki, B. (2020). The influence of sponsored post toward the urge to buy impulsively on the information technology system of the social media of Instagram. AKRUAL: Jurnal Akuntansi, 11(2), 95–109.
Ramadani, L. (2016). Pengaruh penggunaan kartu debit dan uang elektronik (E-Money) terhadap pengeluaran konsumsi mahasiswa. JESP, 8(1).
Ramadhan, A. F., et al. (2016). Persepsi mahasiswa dalam menggunakan E-money. JDEB, 13(2), 131–145.
Republik Indonesia. (2014). Undang-Undang No. 6 Tahun 2014 tentang Desa. Sekretariat Negara.
Saibil, D. I., Sodik, F., & Mardiah, A. A. (2022). Factors affecting the intention of using QRIS in Sharia mobile banking. Jurnal Nisbah, 8, 76–92.
Saputri, O. B. (2020). Consumer preferences in using the Quick Response Code Indonesia Standard (QRIS) as a digital payment tool. Journals of Economics and Business Mulawarman, 17(2), 1–11.
Silalahi, P. R., Tambunan, K., & Batubara, T. R. (2022). Dampak penggunaan QRIS terhadap kepuasan konsumen sebagai alat transaksi. ULIL ALBAB: Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin, 1(2), 122–128.
Sobur, A. (2013). Psikologi umum dalam lintas sejarah. Pustaka Setia.
Syafaastuti, S., Delfina, Y., & Syahchari, D. H. (2024). The use of the Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to analyze the effects of social influence on the interest in implementing cashless payment (QRIS). Proceedings of the 7th International Conference of Computer and Informatics Engineering (IC2IE 2024).
Tobing, G. J., Abubakar, L., & Handayani, T. (2021). Analisis peraturan penggunaan QRIS sebagai kanal pembayaran pada praktik UMKM dalam rangka mendorong perkembangan ekonomi digital. Acta Comitas, 6(3), 491. https://doi.org/10.24843/ac.2021.v06.i03.p3
Trotsek, D. (2020). Tinjauan kebijakan moneter Oktober 2020. Bank Indonesia, 110(9), 1689–169.
Wiryawan, D., Suhartono, J., Hiererra, S. E., & Gui, A. (2023). Factors influencing e-wallet users' perception on payment transaction security: Evaluation on quick response Indonesia standard. AIP Conference Proceedings.
Witjaksono, R. H. A., Handayani, P. W., Sunarso, F. P., & Hilman, M. (2021). Quick response code acceptance on digital wallet mobile applications in Indonesia. Proceedings of the 2021 International Conference on Advanced Computer Science and Information Systems (ICACSIS 2021).