ANALISIS KESANTUNAN BERBAHASA SISWA DALAM TEKS NEGOSIASI BERDASARKAN KAJIAN PRAGMATIK PADA PEMBELAJARAN TATAP MUKA TERBATAS
Abstract
Abstract: Language is a personal reflection of a person when communicating with others. Sometimes the speaker accidentally offends the speech partner because of a misunderstanding in response to a speech. Even though not everyone can accept unsightly speech because it can cause speech partners to hurt their hearts or emotions when listening to unsightly speech. So that the communication that is established does not instill the principle of cooperation called the violation of maxims. This research is related to students' language politeness in the context of negotiations based on pragmatic studies on limited face-to-face learning. This is done because there are still students who do not understand how to communicate politely when communicating with speech partners. This study aims to describe the compliance and violation of maxims based on students' language politeness in negotiating for limited face-to-face learning. The research method is descriptive qualitative with a sociopragmatic approach. The subject of this study was a class X student of SMK. Data in the form of student speech during negotiation practices. Data collection techniques are carried out with listening and capable techniques. Teknik data analysis through data collection, data reduction, data analysis, and conclusion drawing. The results showed that there was a violation of the maxim of wisdom with the maxim of generosity and the fulfillment of the maxim of agreement with the maxim of sympathy in negotiating. The second and fourth data were found to be maximal with a maxim of quantity and a maxim of quality in pragmatic studies.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agus Hermawan. (2017). Kesantunan Berbahasa dalam Negoisasi di Pasar Hewan Cangkring Ponggok Kabupaten Blitar (Tinjauan Pragmatik). 7(2), 184–196. http://ejournal.unikama.ac.id/index.php/jrnspirasi 184
Cahyaningrum, F., Andayani, & Setiawan, B. (2018). Kesantunan Berbahasa Siswa dalam Konteks Negosiasi di Sekolah Menengah Atas. Jurnal Pena Indonesia, 4(1), 79–95. https://journal.unesa.ac.id/index.php/jpi/article/view/2184
Endang, S., Syukur, H., & Mulawarman, U. (2020). TINDAK TUTUR REMAJA SEBAGAI ANAK TUNGGAL DALAM INTERAKSI SEHARI-HARI DI KELAS : 3, 445–454.
Ismiyati, I. (2022). Analisis Kesantunan Tuturan Dalam Novel Tabula Rasa Karya Ratih Kumala. PRASASTI: Journal of Linguistics, 7(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.20961/prasasti.v7i1.52568
Kaisupy, D. A., & Maing, S. G. (2021). Proses Negosiasi Konflik Papua: Dialog Jakarta-Papua. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 10(1), 82. https://doi.org/10.23887/jish-undiksha.v10i1.27056
Kusno, A. (2014). “Kesantunan Bertutur Oleh Orang Tua Kepada Anak Di Lingkungan Rumah Tangga.” Dinamika Ilmu, 14(1), 13--26.
Leech, G. 2019. Prinsip-Prinsip Pragmatik. Jakarta: Penerbit Universitas Indonesia.
Luis, F., & Moncayo, G. (n.d.). No 主観的健康感を中心とした在宅高齢者における 健康関連指標に関する共分散構造分析Title.
Miles, Mathew B. dan A. Micheal Huberman.2007. Analisis Data Kualitatif (terjemahan Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi). Jakarta: UI-Press.
Moleong, L. J. (2012). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Mujianto, G. (2022). Pengintegrasian Pendidikan Karakter Melalui Pendekatan Pragmatik dalam Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia Daring A . Pendahuluan Di masa pandemi Covid-19 ini sistem pembelajaran jarak jauh melalui sistem daring menjadi salah satu alternatif untuk memenuhi prot. 5, 49–70.
Rahardi, K. (2006). Dimensi-Dimensi Kebahasaan Aneka Masalah Bahasa Indonesia Terkini. Yogyakarta: Erlangga.
Rahardi, R. K. (2019). Mendeskripsi Peran Konteks Pragmatik : Menuju Perspektif Cyberpragmatics. https://doi.org/10.31002/transformatika.v
Tetap, D., Studi, P., Indonesia, S., & Pamulang, U. (n.d.). ANALISIS ENTAILMENT DAN IMPLIKATUR PADA BAHASA IKLAN ( DALAM KAJIAN PRAGMATIK ). 1–8.
Utami, F. I. D. (2017). Efektivitas komunikasi negosiasi dalam Bisnis. Jurnal Komunike, 9(2), 105–122.
Yulia, A., Sianturi, D. L., & Pertiwi, R. (2019). Analisis Kesantunan Berbahasa Peserta Didik Berdasarkan Kajian Pragmatik dalam Proses Pembelajaran Bahasa Indonesia di Kelas X IPA 2 SMAN 7 Binjai , Sumatera Utara. 6–10.
Zaman, S. (n.d.). ANALISIS PRAGMATIK FUNGSI TINDAK TUTUR. 219–226.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.