Patrol Boat Strengthening Against a Collision with COLL Notation Based on Class Rules and Regulation in Indonesia – An Overview

Abid Paripurna Fuadi, Teguh Muttaqie, Andi Cahyo Prasetyo Tri Nugroho, Yudiawan Fajar Kusuma, Suherman Mukti, Mohammad Arif Kurniawan, Topan Firmandha, Muhammad Ismail

Abstract

Patrol boats are widely used for maritime security and law enforcement in Indonesia. However, collisions can occur during the operation, leading to potential loss of life, damage to the ship, and environmental harm. To prevent such incidents, patrol boats must be strengthened against collisions in accordance with class rules and regulations in Indonesia. The COLL notation is an additional notation for vessel collision protection, which specifies the required strength of the vessel's hull and structural components to minimize the risk of damage and reduce the consequences of a collision. This study highlights the key areas that require strengthening, including the vessel’s bow, stern, and hull, as well as the propulsion system that needs to be considered in the design stage. The addition of collision bulkheads, increasing the hull plating thickness, and reinforcing the engine mounts and shafting are also necessary to ensure the vessel's safety against collision. In conclusion, strengthening patrol boats against a collision with COLL notation based on class rules and regulations in Indonesia is one of the methods available that can be applied for the design stage to increase the level of operational safety of patrol boats

Full Text:

PDF

References

1. Rules for Classification and Construction, “Part 1 Seagoing Ship, Volume II Rules for Hull, Section. 35 Strengthening Against Collision,” in Biro Klasifikasi Indonesia, Consolidat., 2022.

2. KNKT, “2022 Transportation Accident Investigation Statistics Report Semester 1,” Komite Nasional Keselamatan Transportasi, 2022. (in indonesian)

3. S. H. Park, E. Kang, S. R. Cho, Y. S. Jang, N. K. Baek, and D. K. Park, “Residual strength of stiffened plates having multiple denting damages,” in the 8th International Conference on Collision and Grounding of Ships and Offshore Structures (ICCGS 2019), Lisbon, Portugal, 2019.

4. Z. Yu, J. Amdahl, and Y. Sha, “Large inelastic deformation resistance of stiffened panels subjected to lateral loading,” Mar. Struct., vol. 59, pp. 342-367, 2018.

5. A. R. Prabowo, T. Muttaqie, J. M. Sohn, D. M. Bae, and A. Setiyawan, “On the failure behaviour to striking bow penetration of impacted marine-steel structures,” Curved Layer. Struct., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 68-79, 2018.

6. S. H. Park, S. H. Yoon, T. Muttaqie, Q. T. Do, and S. R. Cho, “Effects of Local Denting and Fracture Damage on the Residual Longitudinal Strength of Box Girders,” J. Mar. Sci. Eng., vol. 11, no. 1, p. 76, 2023.

7. S. Zhang, R. Villavicencio, L. Zhu, and P. T. Pedersen, “Impact mechanics of ship collisions and validations with experimental results,” Mar. Struct., vol. 52, pp. 69-81, 2017.

8. M. R. Khedmati and I. Keivanfar, “Crushing response of bow structure of aluminium high-speed crafts at the event of inclined collisions: numerical simulation,” Int. J. Crashworthiness, vol. 15, no. 5, pp. 469-479, 2010.

9. Q. T. Do, T. Muttaqie, P. T. Nhut, M. T. Vu, N. D. Khoa, and A. R. Prabowo, “Residual ultimate strength assessment of submarine pressure hull under dynamic ship collision,” Ocean Eng., vol. 266, p. 112951, 2022.

10. J. Parunov, S. Rudan, and B. B. Primorac, “Residual ultimate strength assessment of double hull oil tanker after collision,” Eng. Struct., vol. 148, pp. 704-717, 2017.

11. A. R. Prabowo, D. M. Bae, J. M. Sohn, A. F. Zakki, B. Cao, and J. H. Cho, “Effects of the rebounding of a striking ship on structural crashworthiness during ship-ship collision,” Thin-Walled Struct., vol. 115, pp. 225-239, 2017.

12. M. A. G. Calle, R. E. Oshiro, and M. Alves, “Ship collision and grounding: Scaled experiments and numerical analysis,” Int. J. Impact Eng., vol. 103, pp. 195-210, 2017.

13. S. R. Cho and H. S. Lee, “Experimental and analytical investigations on the response of stiffened plates subjected to lateral collisions,” Mar. Struct., vol. 22, no. 1, pp. 84-95, 2009.

14. J. W. Ringsberg, J. Amdahl, B. Q. Chen, S. R. Cho, S. Ehlers, Z. Hu, and et al, “MARSTRUCT benchmark study on nonlinear FE simulation of an experiment of an indenter impact with a ship side-shell structure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 59, pp. 142-157, 2018.

15. M. Zhang, J. Liu, Z. Hu, and Y. Zhao, “Experimental and numerical investigation of the responses of scaled tanker side double-hull structures laterally punched by conical and knife edge indenters,” Mar. Struct., vol. 61, pp. 62-84, 2018.

16. S. R. Cho, Q. T. Do, and H. K. Shin, “Residual strength of damaged ring-stiffened cylinders subjected to external hydrostatic pressure,” Mar. Struct., vol. 56, pp. 186-205, 2017.

17. J. Chen and X. Zhang, “Design and analysis of collision protection for a patrol boat based on numerical simulation,” Ocean Eng., vol. 188, pp. 161-171, 2019.

18. H. Kim, J. H. Kim, M. H. Kim, and Y. H. Park, “Experimental investigation of the collision strength of a reinforced patrol boat,” Ocean Eng., vol. 209, p. 107481, 2020.

19. Y. J. Lee and K. Y. Kim, “Structural design of an energy-absorbing structure for patrol boats in collision scenarios,” Ocean Eng., vol. 138, pp. 405-415, 2017.

20. Y. J. Jung, D. H. Kim, M. H. Kim, and Y. H. Park, “Numerical analysis on the collision behavior of a patrol boat considering collision angle,” Ocean Eng., vol. 168, pp. 170-180.

21. S. Haris and J. Amdahl, “Analysis of ship-ship collision damage accounting for bow and side deformation interaction,” Mar. Struct., vol. 32, pp. 18-48, 2013.

22. S. Otto, P. T. Pedersen, M. Samuelides, and P. C. Sames, “Elements of risk analysis for collision and grounding of a RoRo passenger ferry,” Mar. Struct., vol. 15, no. 4-5, pp. 461-474, 2022.

23. S. H. Yu, S. Y. Jin, and W. J. Lee, “Design optimization of collision protection systems for patrol boats using genetic algorithms,” J. Mar. Sci. Technol., vol. 25, no. 5, pp. 1041-1052, 2020.

24. M. Storheim and J. Amdahl, “On the sensitivity to work hardening and strain-rate effects in nonlinear FEM analysis of ship collisions,” Ships Offshore Struct., vol. 12, no. 1, pp. 100-115, 2017.

25. A. P. Mouritz, E. Gellert, P. Burchill, and K. Challis, “Review of advanced composite structures for naval ships and submarines,” Compos. Struct., vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 21-42, 2001.

26. J. W. Ringsberg, Z. Li, E. Johnson, A. Kuznecovs, and R. Shafieisabet, “Reduction in ultimate strength capacity of corroded ships involved in collision accidents,” Ships Offshore Struct., vol. 13, no. sup 1, pp. 155-166, 2018.

27. Muryadin, T. Muttaqie, C. Sasmito, F. M. Noor, A. C. P. T. Nugroho, D. H. Priatno, B. Al Hakim, A. P. Fuadi, M. H. Khoirudin, T. Wibowo, and A. M. F. Putra, “Dynamic response of high-speed craft bottom panels subjected to slamming loadings,” Curved Layer. Struct., vol. 10, no. 1, p. 20220190, 2023.

28. BRIN, “Dynamic mass impact mass impact on side shell structure of 50 m Fast patrol boat, Technical report,” Inhouse report, Indonesian, 2023.

29. S. Zhang, The mechanics of ship collisions (PhD thesis). Denmark: Technical University of Denmark, 1999.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/mekanika.v23i1.74967

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.