Evaluasi fertilitas, daya tetas, dan kualitas DOD dari itik Alabimaster, Mojomaster, dan Mojomaster x Alabimaster

Tatan Kostaman, Dewi Sari Kumalawati, Soni Sopiyana, Maijon Purba

Abstract

Objective: The evaluating of the fertility, hatchability, and DOD quality of the ducks selected by the Indonesian Research Institute for Animal Production (Balitnak) consisting of Alabimaster, Mojomaster, and Mojomaster x Alabimaster (MASTER) ducks.

Methods: The research was conducted at the Ducks Cage Complex, Balitnak. Using 9,388 Alabimaster duck eggs, 1,635 Mojomaster duck eggs, and 7,638 Mojomaster x Alabimaster (MASTER) duck eggs. The variables observed included fertility, hatchability, and DOD quality. The DOD criteria chosen were healthy, agile, not blind, not disabled, not weak, not wet, and not omphalitis. Completely Randomized Design (CRD) was used and the calculation of the average data for all variables was processed with the help of the SPSS 25.0 program. If there is a difference in value, then the test is carried out with the Duncan Multiple Range Test.

Results: The fertility percentage of Alabimaster, Mojomaster, and MASTER ducks did not show any difference (P>0.05) but seen from the relatively high percentage value because it gave a figure of 94%. The percentage of hatchability was significantly different (P<0.05) for the three ducks. The percentage of DOD that passed the selection, MASTER ducks gave a higher value than the other two ducks. The ratio of male and female cubs for the three ducks showed that there were more male than female cubs, but still within the normal range.

Conclusions: The average fertility, hatchability, and DOD selected from the hatching eggs of Alabimaster, Mojomaster, and MASTER ducks resulted from the research being quite good.

Keywords

Fertility; hatchability; DOD; ducks

References

  1. Keputusan Menteri Pertanian RI. 2015. Pelepasan galur itik Alabimaster-1 agrinak. Kementerian Pertanian Republik Indonesia, Jakarta.
  2. Prasetyo, L. H., T. Susanti, P. P. Ketaren, A. R. Setioko, M. Purba, dan B. Tiesnamurti. 2016. Itik Mojomaster-1 Agrinak. Puslitbang Peternakan, Badan Litbang Pertanian, Bogor.
  3. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan. 2019. Statistik Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan Tahun 2019. Penerbit: Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan, Kementerian Pertanian RI.
  4. Taplah Jr, A. J., D. C. Suministrado, R. M. C. Amongo, F. O. Paras Jr, J. C. Elauria, and D. P. Torkpah. 2018. Economic analysis of duck eggs incubation using hot spring as heat source. J. Dev. Agric. Econ. 10:38-44. Doi: 10.5897/JDAE2017.0870
  5. Widiyaningrum, P., L. Lisdiana, and N. Utami. 2016 Egg production and hatchability of local ducks under semi intensive vs extensive managements. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 41:77-82. Doi: 10.14710/jitaa.41.2.77-82
  6. Mia, M. M., M. R. Hasnath, A. S. M. Mahbub, and S. A. Belal. 2019. Evaluation of comparative fertility, hatchability, embryonic mortality and duckling survibility of different duck genotypes. J. Poult. Sci.Technol. 07:32-37.
  7. Kostaman, T., S. Sopiyana, B. D. P. Soewandi, dan Komarudin. 2020. Persentase fertilitas dan daya tetas ayam cemani dan white leghorn berdasarkan ukuran bobot telur. J. Agripet 20:118-125. Doi: 10.17969/agripet.v20i2. 16411
  8. Komarudin, T. Sartika, T. Kostaman, dan H. Zainal. 2020. Evaluasi fertilitas, daya tetas dan DOC terseleksi ayam Gaok dengan metode inseminasi buatan. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi dan Agribisnis Peternakan. 7:511-516.
  9. Daud, M., M. Aman Yaman, dan Zulfan. 2020. Potensi penggunaan limbah ikan leubiem (Chanthidermis maculatus) sebagai sumber protein dalam ransum terhadap produktivitas itik petelur. Livest. Anim. Res. 18:217-228. Doi: 10.20961/lar.v18i3.45992
  10. Salamon, A. 2020. Fertility and hatchability in goose eggs: A review. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 19:51-65. Doi: 10.3923/ijps.2020.51.65
  11. Mohan, J., S. Sharma, G. Kolluri, and K. Dhama. 2018. History of artificial insemination in poultry, its components and significance. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 74:1-14. Doi: 10.1017/S0043933918000430
  12. Abd El-Hack, M. E., C. B. Hurtado, D. M. Toro, M. Alawanyi, E. M. Abdelfattah, and S. S. Elnesr. 2019. Fertility and hatchability in duck eggs. Worlds Poult. Sci. J. 75:1-9. Doi: 10.1017/S0043933919000060
  13. Giri, S. C., P. Kumar, R. Jaiswara, R. K. S. Bais, S. K. Sahoo, K. V. H. Sastry, and S. Saran. 2014. Ideal mating sex ratio in duck houses for optimum production of fertile eggs. Indian J. Poult. Sci. 49:106-107.
  14. Darmawati, D., Rukmiasih, dan R. Afnan. 2016. Daya tetas telur itik Cihateup dan Alabio. JIPTHP. 4:257-263.
  15. Kostaman, T., S. Sopiyana, D. S. Kumalawati, T. Susanti, dan M. Purba. 2021. Performa dan penyebaran itik unggul Balitbangtan untuk mempercepat pembibitan itik di masyarakat. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. 512-524. Doi: 10.14334/ prossemnastpv.v20i20.2632
  16. Kumalawati, D. S. dan T. Susanti. 2019. Pengaruh breed terhadap fertilitas, daya tetas dan kematian embrio pada telur itik Alabio, Mojosari dan persilangan Peking x Mojosari Putih. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknologi Peternakan dan Veteriner. 583-592. Doi: 10.14334/ prossemnastpv.v0i0.2148
  17. Abudabos, A. 2010. The effect of broiler breeder strain and parent flock age on hatchability and fertil hatchability. Int. J. Poult. Sci. 9:231-235. Doi: 10.3932/ijps. 2010.231.235
  18. van den Brand, H., M. P. Sosef, A. Lourens, and J. van Harn. 2016. Effects of floor eggs on hatchability and later life performance in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 95:1025-1032. Doi: 10.3382/ps/pew008
  19. Archer, G. S., D. Jeffrey, and Z. Tucker. 2017. Effect of the combination of white and red LED lighting during incubation on layer, broiler, and Pekin duck hatchability. Poult. Sci. 96:2670-2675. Doi: 10.3382/ps/pex040
  20. Ramli, M. B., M. S. Wahab, B. A. Zain, A. A. Raus, K. Kamarudin, N. Sa’ude, R. Haq, M. Ibrahim, and A. Ahmed. 2017. Effect of incubation temperature on IKTA's quail breed with new rolling mechanism system. JMechE. 4:78-88.
  21. Suselowati, T., E. Kurnianto, dan S. Kismiati. 2019. Hubungan indeks bentuk telur dan surface area telur terhadap bobot telur, bobot tetas, persentase bobot tetas, daya tetas dan mortalitas embrio pada itik Pengging. Sains Peternakan. 17:24-30. Doi: 10.20961/sainspet.v17i2.30212
  22. Mustabsyirah, U. 2015. Karakteristik fisikokimia telur infertil hasil afkir industri penetasan pada lama penetasan yang berbeda. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Hasanudin.
  23. Ubba, E. T. 2015. Potensi antioksidan pada telur infertil hasil seleksi berdasarkan waktu pengeraman yang berbeda. Skripsi. Fakultas Peternakan, Universitas Hasanudin.
  24. Iqbal, J., S. H. Khanb, N. Mukhtara, T. Ahmedc, and R. A. Pasha. 2016. Effects of egg size (weight) and age on hatching performance and chick quality of broiler breeder. J. App. Anim. Res. 44:54-64. Doi: 10.1080/09712119.2014.987294
  25. Junnu, S. and T. Pohuang. 2019. Chick quality and one day old chick assessment at hatchery. KKU Vet. J. 29:117-128.
  26. Burhanudin, D., D. M. Saleh, dan S. Mugiyono. 2019. Pengaruh interval inseminasi buatan dan konsentrasi spermatozoa terhadap salable chick dan grade out pada ayam Sentul. ANGON J. Anim. Sc. Technol. 1:168-177.
  27. Amantai, S., N. Omarkhozha, N. J. Kazhgaliev, M. B. Saginbaeva, and D. Arney. 2018. Hatchability and hatchling sex ratio depending on holding period and physical parameters of hatchingeggs. Europ. Poult. Sci. 82:1612-9199. Doi: 10.1399/eps.2018.228
  28. Molenaar, R., R. Hulet, R. Meijerhof,C. M. Maatjens, B. Kemp, and H. van den Brand. 2011. High eggshell temperatures during incubation decrease growth performance and increase the incidence of ascites in broiler chickens. Poult. Sci. 90:624-632. Doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00970

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v19i2.47665

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.