Faktor-faktor yang mempengaruhi adopsi pemanfaatan limbah pertanian sebagai pakan pada peternak sapi perah di Kabupaten Enrekang

Syahdar Baba, Ilham Syarif, Sitti Sohrah

Abstract

Objective: This study aim was to determine the factors that influence the adoption of agricultural waste utilization as dairy feed among farmers in Enrekang Regency.

Methods: This research was conducted from July to September 2019 in Cendana and Anggeraja Districts, which are the centers for dairy cows in Enrekang district. The number of farmers in these two sub-districts were 261 people or 72% of the total population of dairy farmers in Enrekang district. The number of respondents were 77 who were selected using the simple random sampling method. Data collection was carried out by trained enumerators using a questionnaire. Data analysis used the F test to determine the effect of the independent variable on the dependent variable (adoption of agricultural waste utilization) and the t test for the partial test of each independent variable. The mathematical model used was a logistic regression model because the variable adoption of agricultural waste utilization was a dichotomous variable.

Results: The results showed that the most common types of agricultural waste used as feed in the dry season were sweet potato leaves and rejected sweet potatoes (50.6%), while in the rainy season it was sweet corn straw (30.6%). The method of utilizing agricultutral waste as feed was: directly given to dairy cattle (53%), withered first (25%), fermented (11%) and mixed with concentrate (11%). Factors that influence the adoption of agricultural waste as feed were the number of lactating dairy cattle (X1), contact with extension workers (X4) and the age of farmers (X5). Meanwhile, the cosmopolite variables (X2), formal education (X3), length of farming (X6) and number of families (X7) did not affect the adoption of agricultural was as feed.

Conclusions: To increase the adoption of agricultural waste as feed, the intensity of extension needs to be increased, especially for older breeders with 1 - 3 heads of lactating cattle.

Keywords

adoption; dangke; Enrekang District; agricultural waste; feed

References

  1. Premisti, P. U. L., A. Setiadi, dan W. Sumekar. 2016. Analisis pendapatan peternak sapi perah kecamatan Mojosongo dan Cepogo, Kabupaten Boyolali. Jurnal Pengembangan Penyuluhan Pertanian. 13(23):60-67. Doi: 10.36626/jppp.v13i23.109
  2. Rahayu, R. S., W. Roessali, A. Setiadi, dan Mukson. 2014. Kontribusi usaha sapi perah terhadap pendapatan peternak di Kecamatan Getasan Kabupaten Semarang. Agriekonomika 3(1):45-54. Doi: 10.21107/agriekonomika.v3i1.439
  3. Baba, S. 2007. Analisis tingkat adopsi usaha ternak sapi perah di Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Vegeta 2:14-19.
  4. Dinas Peternakan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Enrekang. 2020. Laporan kinerja bidang peternakan Kabupaten Enrekang Tahun 2019. Dinas Peternakan dan Perikanan Kabupaten Enrekang, Enrekang.
  5. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan. 2019. Statistik peternakan Indonesia. Direktorat Jenderal Peternakan dan Kesehatan Hewan Indonesia, Jakarta.
  6. Baba, S., A. Muktiani, A. Ako, dan M. I. Dagong. 2011. Keragaman dan kebutuhan teknologi peternak sapi perah di Kabupaten Enrekang. Med. Pet. 34(2):146-154. Doi: 10.5398/medpet.2011.34.2.146
  7. Baba, S. 2007. Kontribusi usaha ternak sapi perah terhadap pendapatan peternak sapi perah di Kabupaten Enrekang. Jurnal Vegeta 1(1):7-13.
  8. Pierpaoli, E., G. Carli, E. Pignatti and M. Canavari. 2013. Drivers of precision agriculture technologies adoption: a literature review. 6th international conference on information and communication technologies in agriculture, food and environment (HAICTA 2013), Procedia Technology (8):62-69. Doi: 10.1016/j.protcy.2013.11.010
  9. Saengavut, V. and N. Jirasatthumb. 2021. Smallholder decision-making process in technology adoption intention: implications for Dipterocarpus alatusin Northeastern Thailand. Helyon e06633:1 - 10. Doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e06633
  10. Martinez-Garcia, C. G., S. J. Ugoretz, C. M. Arriaga-Jordan, and M. A. Wattiaux. 2015. Farm, household, and farmer characteristics associated with changes in management practices and technology adoption among dairy smallholders. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 47:311-316. Doi: 10.1007/s11250-014-0720-4
  11. Sharma, M. 2016. Effect of age and educational level of dairy farmers on knowledge and adoption of dairy farming practices in Kapurthala district of Punjab. Int. J. Farm Sci. 6(4):254-262.
  12. Olorunfemi, T. O., O. D. Olorunfemi, and O. I. Oladele. 2020. Determinants of the involvement of extension agents in disseminating climate smart agricultural initiatives: Implication for scaling up. J. Saudi Soc. Agric. Sci. 19(4):285-292. Doi: 10.1016/j.jssas.2019.03.003
  13. Singh, A. S., K. Singh, R. Chakravarty, and P. Imtiwati. 2014. Differential adoption of improved dairy husbandry practices in Hill and Valley Regions of Manipur (India). Iran J. Appl. Anim. Sci. 4(3):509-514.
  14. Mardikanto, T. 2009. Sistem penyuluhan pertanian. UNS Press, Surakarta.
  15. Dehinenet G., H. Mekonnen, M. Kidoido, M. Ashenafi, and E. G. Bleich. 2014. Factors influencing adoption of dairy technology on small holder dairy farmers in selected zones of Amhara and Oromia National Regional States, Ethiopia. Discourse Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences. 2(5):126-135.
  16. Hidayah, N., C. A. Ardita, dan F. B. Lestari. 2019. Pengaruh karakteristik peternak terhadap adopsi teknologi pemeliharaan pada peternak kambing Peranakan Ettawa di Desa Hargotirto Kabupaten Kulon Progo. Jurnal Bisnis dan Manajemen 19(1):1-10. Doi : 10.20961/jbm.v19i1.30916
  17. Bungin, B. 2004. Metodologi penelitian kuantitatif. Prenada Media, Jakarta.
  18. Rahardjo, S. dan D. Sarwanto. 2018. Profil peternakan sapi perah rakyat di Kabupaten Banyumas Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Prosiding Seminar Teknologi dan Agribisnis Peternakan VI. 6(2018):307-315.
  19. Agustono, B., M. Lamid, A. Ma’ruf, dan M.T.E. Purnama. 2017. Identifikasi limbah pertanian dan perkebunan sebagai bahan pakan konvensional di Banyuwangi. Jurnal Medik Veteriner 1(1):12-22.
  20. Gakige, J.K., C. Gachuri, K. Butterbach-bahl and J.P. Goopy. 2020. Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas) vine silage: a cost-effective supplement for milk production in smallholder dairy-farming systems of East Africa? Anim. Prod. Sci. 60:1087-1094. Doi: 10.1071/AN18743.
  21. Peters, D. 2008. Assessment of the potential of sweet potato as livestock feed in East Africa: Rwanda, Uganda, and Kenya. A report presented to The International Potato Center (CIP) in Nairobi, FAO Report, Nairobi.
  22. Khalil, Reswati, Y. F. Kurnia, dan Ferawati. 2017. Perbaikan teknologi pakan untuk menjaga keutuhan kelompok tani penerima bantuan ternak sapi di Kabupaten Tanah Datar dan kota Payakumbuh, Sumatera Barat. Agrokreatif Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian Masyarakat 3(1):40-51. Doi: 10.29244/agrokreatif.3.1.40-51
  23. Suningsih, N., W. Ibrahim, O. Lianris, dan R. Yulianti. 2019. Kualitas fisik dan nutrisi jerami padi fermentasi pada berbagai penambahan starter. Jurnal Sains Peternakan Indonesia 14(2):191-200. Doi: 10.31186/jspi.id.14.2.191-200
  24. Magrianti, T., Priyono, dan D. Priyanto. 2019. Analisis pola penyediaan hijauan pakan dan strategi pengembangan pada lokasi kawasan sapi perah di Jawa Tengah. Pros. Semnas. TPV. 2019:110-122. Doi: 10.14334/Pros.Semnas.TPV-2019-p.110-122
  25. Baba, S. 2012. Tingkat partisipasi peternak sapi perah dalam penyuluhan di Kabupaten Enrekang. JITP 2(1):39-49.
  26. Indraningsih, K. S. 2016. Pengaruh penyuluhan terhadap keputusan petani dalam adopsi inovasi teknologi usahatani terpadu. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi 29(1):1-24.
  27. Baba, S., M. I. A. Dagong, and M. Risal. 2014. Some factors affecting intensive rearing adoption on beef cattle farmers in Wajo regency, South Sulawesi Province. J. Indones. Trop. Anim. Agric. 39(4):235-241. Doi: 10.14710/jitaa.39.4.235-241
  28. Astuti, M., R. Widiati, dan Y. Y. Suranindyah. 2010. Efisiensi produksi usaha sapi perah rakyat (studi kasus pada peternak anggota koperasi usaha peternakan dan pemerahan sapi perah Kaliurang, Sleman Yogyakarta). Buletin Peternakan 34(1):64-69. Doi: 10.21059/ buletinpeternak.v34i1.108
  29. Ako, A., S. Baba, Fatma, Jamila, and M. Rusdy. 2016. Effect of complete feed silage made from agricultural waste on milk yield and quality of dairy cows. Online J. Biol. Sci. 16(4):159-164. Doi: 10.3844/ojbsci. 2016.159.164

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v19i2.46815

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.