Evaluasi persepsi penerapan penumbuhan unit usaha complete feed sapi potong (Studi kasus di kelompoktani Kabupaten Pasuruan)

Yudi Rustandi, Ismulhadi Ismulhadi, Mirna Silviani

Abstract

Objective: Members of farmer group are required to be more adaptive to change in livestock technology development, one of which is the innovation of growing animal feed business units as part of the production unit of farmer groups. This study aimed to determine the suitability level of the extension program and the perception of group members in the application of growing beef cattle complete feed business units.

Methods: This study is an evaluation study with a formative and summative evaluation model. The objects of evaluation are 1) Suitability of extension programs and 2) Perceptions of farmer group members on the growth of beef cattle complete feed business units. Respondents were 38 members of farmer groups. The instrument in the form of a questionnaire (likert scale) test through validity and reliability tests. Data analysis used quantitative descriptive analysis and T score.

Results: The results of the evaluation, the members of the farmer groups assessed: 1) The extension program was appropriate because; material aspect T score> 39.92, media aspect T score> 19.95, and method aspect T score> 24.92, 2) Innovation attributes, namely: a) relative advantage, can be tried (trialability), and observability, as many as 38 people or 100% expressed a positive perception, b) the level of compatibility, as many as 36 people or 94.40% expressed a positive perception, c) the level of complexity, as many as 37 people or 97, 36% expressed a positive perception.

Conclusions: Farmers' group members assess that the extension program is appropriate, and their perceptions are also positive on efforts to grow beef cattle complete feed business units.

Keywords

Business Units; Complete Feed; Evaluation; Extension; Perception

References

Putra R. 2018. Kontribusi Usaha Peternakan terhadap Pembangunan Pedesaan di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. Simposium Nasional Penelitian dan Pengembangan Peternakan Tropik Tahun 2018. Yogyakarta: Fakultas Peternakan Universitas Gajah Mada. Published Online. 218-221.

Amam A. and P. A Harsita. 2019. Tiga Pilar Usaha Ternak: Breeding, Feeding, and Management. Jurnal Sain Peternakan Indonesia. 14: 431-439. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.31186/jspi.id.14.4.431-439.

Rusdiana, S. and S. Soeharsono. 2019. Upaya Pencapaian Daya Saing Usaha Sapi Perah Melalui Kebijakan Pemerintah dan Peningkatan Pendapatan Peternak. Agriekonomika. 8: 36-50. doi: http://doi. org/10.21107/agriekonomika.v8i1.5111.

Pinardi, Dj. A. Gunarto, and Santoso. 2019. Perencanaan Lanskap Kawasan Penerapan Inovasi Teknologi Peternakan Prumpung Berbasis Ramah Lingkungan. JIPT.7: 251-262. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.23960/jipt.v7 i2.p%25p

Erowati, D. A. 2011. Penerapan teknologi silase hijauan makanan ternak (HMT) di Jombang Jawa Timur. Jurnal Teknologi Lingkungan. 1: 184-188. doi: https://doi.org /10.29122/jtl.v1i2.179.

Fardiah, D. 2005. Focus Group Discussion dalam Paradigma Pembangunan Partisipatif. Mediator Jurnal Komunikasi. 6: 95-108. doi: https:// doi.org/10.29313/mediator.v6i1.1180.

Mulijanti, S. L., S. Tedy, and M. Dianawati. 2016. Upaya Pemenuhan Kebutuhan Pakan Secara Berkelompok. Perlindungan dan Pemberdayaan Pertanian dalam Rangka Pencapaian Kemandirian Pangan Nasional dan Peningkatan Kesejahteraan Petani. pse-litbang pertanian. Published Online. 295-302.

Bandaso, R. M. 2015. Evaluasi Program Pemberdayaan Kelompok Tani Kelurahan Jaya Kecamatan Telluwanua Kota Palopo (Studi Kasus Petani Pelaku SL-PTT Padi). Perbal Jurnal Pertanian Berkelanjutan. 2: 26-43. doi: http://dx. doi.org/10.30605/ perbal.v2i3.57.

Edwina, S., E. Maharani, Y. Kusumawaty, J. Yusri, and Y. Yusmini. 2019. Perception of Farmers of Communal and Individual Stalls Towards the Role of Extension on Integrated Farming in Pelalawan District. Jurnal Penyuluhan. 15: 217-229. doi: https: //doi.org/10.22500/152019.

Kantun, S. 2017. Penelitian Evaluatif Sebagai Salah Satu Model Penelitian Dalam Bidang Pendidikan (Suatu Kajian Konseptual). Jurnal Pendidikan Ekon Jurnal Ilmu- Ilmu Pendidikan Ilmu Ekonomi Dan Ilmu Sosial. 10.

Azwar, 2016. Metode Penelitian. Yogyakarta. Pustaka Pelajar.

Rustandi, Y. and R. Suhadji. 2017. Keragaan Evaluasi Fungsi Kelembagaan Kelompok Tani di Kecamatan Papar Kabupaten Kediri Jawa Timur. Agrica Ekstensia. 11: 55-60.

Syarief. Y. A. and T. Endaryanto. 2020. Kajian Proses Pembelajaran dalam Penyuluhan Pertanian untuk Meningkatkan Kompetensi Kewira-usahaan Petani Jagung Di Kabupaten Grobogan Provinsi Jawa Tengah. Agritech. 21: 101-108. doi:10.30595/agritech.v21i2. 3484.

Indraningsih, K. S., B. G. Sugihen, P. Tjitrpranoto, P. S. Asngari, and H. Wijayanto. 2016. Kinerja Penyuluh Dari Perspektif Petani Dan Eksistensi Penyuluh Swadaya Sebagai Pendamping Penyuluh Pertanian. Analis Kebijakan Pertanian. 8: 303-321. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/ akp.v8n4.2010.303-321

Siswanto, D. 2012. Hakikat Penyuluhan Pembangunan Dalam Masyarakat. Jurnal Filsafat. 22: 51-68. doi: https://doi.org/ 10.22146/jf.12985.

Wulandari, R. 2015. Information Needs and Source Information of Agricultural Extension Workers in DIY. Agraris Jurnal. 1: 85-97. doi:10.18196/agr.1212.

Gandhi, R., R. Veeraraghavan, K. Toyama, and V. Ramprasad. 2007. Digital Green: Participatory Video For Agricultural Extension. In: 2007 International Conference On Information And Communication Technologies And Development. IEEE; :1-10. doi:10.1109/ ICTD.2007.4937388.

Imran, A. N., Muhanniah, and B.R.W. Giono. 2019. Metode Penyuluhan Pertanian dalam Meningkatkan Pengetahuan dan Keterampilan Petani (Studi Kasus di Kecamatan Maros Baru Kabupaten Maros). Jurnal Agrisep. 18: 289-304. doi: 10.31186/jagrisep.18.2.289-304.

Kozlowski, S. W. J, and D. R. Ilgen. 2006. Enhancing the Effectiveness of Work Groups and Teams. Psychol Sci Public Interest Jour. 7: 77-124. doi: 10.1111/j.1529-1006.2006.00030.x.

Purnomo, E., N. Pangarsa, K. B. Andri, and M. Saeri. 2015. Efektivitas Metode Penyuluhan Dalam Percepatan Transfer Teknologi Padi di Jawa Timur. JINOTEP Jurnal. 1: 191-204. doi:10.17977/um031v1 i22015p191.

Rogers, E. M. 1995. Diffusion of Innovasions. Collier Macmillan Canada: The Free Press.

Suarta, I. M. and I. K. Suwintana. 2012. Model Pengukuran Konstruks Adopsi Inovasi E-Learning. J Sist Inf. 8: 1-7. doi: https://doi.org/10.21609/jsi.v8i1.317.

Sugandini, D. and M. I. Effendi. 2013. Keunggulan Relatif, Keterlihatan, Persepsi Risiko, Pengalaman Dan Sikap Dalam Penolakan Adopsi Inovasi Pupuk Organik Bersubsidi. Researchgate.net. Published online.1-19. https://www.researchgate.net/ publication/325949459.

Sahin, I. 2006. Detailed review of Rogers’ diffusion of innovations theory and educational technology-related studies based on Rogers’ theory. Turk Online J Educ Technol-TOJET. 5: 14-23.

Musyafak, A. and T. M. Ibrahim. 2017.

Strategi Percepatan Adopsi Dan Difusi Inovasi Pertanian Mendukung Prima Tani. Analisis Kebijakan Pertanian. 3: 20-37. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.21082/akp.v3n1.2005.20-37.

Haryanto, D. P. 2007. Inovasi Pembelajaran. Perspektif Ilmu Pendidikan. 16: 102-119. doi: https://doi.org/10.21009/ PIP.162.

Robson, K. L. 2013. Sociology of Education in Canada. Toronto. Pearson Canada Inc.

Ghane, F., B. A. Samah, A. Ahmad, and K. Idris. 2011. The Role of Social Influence and Innovation Characteristics in the Adoption of Integrated Pest Management (IPM) Practices by Paddy Farmers in Iran. In: Proceedings of the International Conference on Social Science and Humanity. 5: 217-220.

Reed, M. S. 2007. Participatory Technology Development for Agroforestry Extension: an Innovation-Decision Approach. Afr J Agric Res. 2:334-341. doi:https://doi.org/ 10.5897/AJAR.9000525.

Leeuwis, C. 2013. Communication for Rural Innovation: Rethinking Agricultural Extension. John Wiley & Sons.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/lar.v19i1.44148

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.