Komunikasi Stakeholder pada Program Corporate Social Responsibility PT Semen Gresik dalam Mencapai Social License to Operate

Dwi Prasetyo Wijanarko, Andre Noevi Rahmanto

Abstract

The implementation of Corporate social responsibility (CSR) is one of the company's strategies in building legitimacy or social acceptance, also known as social license to operate, as well as strengthening relationships with the community. In the context of PT Semen Gresik, the existence of factory and mining activities directly affects the environment and landscape, and has the potential to cause negative externalities and social problems in the community. Relationships with stakeholders are key to the success of the CSR program at PT Semen Gresik. This is because since the factory was first established, there has been conflict and resistance from some members of the community. Therefore, relationships and communication with the community as the main stakeholders in the CSR program are crucial. This study aims to describe stakeholder communication in CSR programs in an effort to achieve social license to operate. This study uses a descriptive qualitative approach with a case study research method. The theory referred to is the CSR Communication Model by Morsing & Schultz (2006). Data were obtained through interviews, documentation, and observation. The results of the study show that PT Semen Gresik implements stakeholder communication in accordance with the CSR Communication Model. PT Semen Gresik maps community stakeholders and then adjusts them to the appropriate communication strategies so that the communication process can run effectively. This study confirms that the success of stakeholder communication in CSR programs lies in the extent to which companies are able to be open in conveying information, listening to aspirations, and actively involving the role of community stakeholders in every stage of the program.

Keywords

Keywords: Stakeholder Communication, Corporate social responsibility, Social license to operate

Full Text:

PDF

References

Azhery, B. 2011. Corporate social responsibility dari voluntary menjadi mandatory. Jakarta. PT Raja Gravindo Persada.

Creswell, J. W., & Creswell, J. D. (2018). Research Design: qualitative, quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches Fifth Edition. California: SAGE Publications.

Hadi, Nor. 2011. Corporate social responsibility. Yogyakarta: Graha Ilmu.

Hairani, H., Innuddin, M., Rachman, D. F., Fathoni, A., & Hadi, S. (2023). Sosialisasi Internet Sehat, Cerdas, Kreatif Dan Produktif Pada Masyarakat Kalijaga Baru. Valid Jurnal Pengabdian, 1(3), 1-10.

Hairani, H., Innuddin, M., Rachman, D. F., Fathoni, A., & Hadi, S. (2023). Sosialisasi Internet Sehat, Cerdas, Kreatif Dan Produktif Pada Masyarakat Kalijaga Baru. Valid Jurnal Pengabdian, 1(3), 1-10.

Hendra, H., & Rachmawati, I. K. (2023). Pengaruh Stakeholder Engagement, Social Mapping, dan Penerapan Corporate social responsibility terhadap Ketercapaian Social license to operate. Jurnal Ilmiah Global Education, 4(3), 1963-1978.

Hidayatullah, U., Rini, H. S., & Arsal, T. (2017). Analisis peta konflik pembangunan pabrik pt. semen indonesia di kecamatan gunem kabupaten rembang.

Jeffery, N. (2009). Stakeholder engagement: A road map to meaningful engagement.

Mardikanto, T. (2014). Corporate social responsibility (Tanggung Jawab Sosial Korporasi). Bandung: Alfabeta.

Moffat, K., Lacey, J., Zhang, A., & Leipold, S. (2016). The social licence to operate: a critical review. Forestry: An International Journal of Forest Research, 89(5), 477-488.

Morsing, M., & Schultz, M. (2006). Corporate social responsibility communication: stakeholder information, response and involvement strategies. Business ethics: A European review, 15(4), 323-338.

Oktavia, Siska dan Saharuddin. 2013. Hubungan Peran Stakeholder dengan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Agropolitan Desa karacak Kecamatan Leuwiliang Kabupaten Bogor. Bogor: Jurnal Sosiologi Pedesaan. Vol. 1,No.3: 231-246.

Prno, J., & Slocombe, D. S. (2012). Exploring the origins of ‘social license to operate’in the mining sector: Perspectives from governance and sustainability theories. Resources policy, 37(3), 346-357.

Security and Human Rights Hub. (n.d.). Social licence to operate. Security and Human Rights Hub. https://www.securityhumanrightshub.org/media/pdf/resources/Social

Licence-to-Operate-Paper.pdf

Thomson, I. and Boutilier, R.G. 2011. Social license to operate. In SME Mining Engineering Handbook, ed. Darling, P., 1779–1796. Colorado, US: Society for Mining, Metallurgy and Exploration.

Wiryanto, 2005. Pengantar Ilmu Komunikasi, Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana Indonesia.

Wulandari, A. (2020). Komunikasi Pemangku Kepentingan (Stakeholder Communication). Yogyakarta: Sedayu Sukses Makmur.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.