Perbandingan model pembelajaran problem based learning dengan metode mnemonic dan model pembelajaran problem based learning dengan alat peraga terhadap kemampuan penalaran matematis siswa

Niqmah Putri Ukhrowi

Abstract

Students' mathematical reasoning abilities are still relatively low, this is due to the passive factor of students (only receiving information from the teacher) and the selection of learning models that are not appropriate to the mathematics learning material. This study compared two experimental classes, namely the first experimental class used the problem based learning model with the mnemonic method and the second experimental class used the problem based learning model with teaching aids. The method used in this research is quasi-experimental, the sampling technique is purposive sampling. The population in this study were class VII students of SMPN 2 Balaraja, totaling 306 students with a total sample of 68 students. The instrument used is an essay test. Hypothesis analysis was carried out using the pooled variance model t-test, because the samples were normally distributed and homogeneous. The results of the pooled variance t-test for the pretest data obtained t_(count)=1.42 and t_(table)=1.997 so there was no significant difference, while for the posttest hypothesis test obtained t_(count)=2.70 and t_ (table) = 1.997, it can be concluded that after being given treatment there are differences in students' mathematical reasoning abilities in the matter of linear equations or variables between students who are given the problem-based learning model using the mnemonic method and the problem-based learning model with visual aids. This shows that the problem based learning model with visual aids is higher than the problem based learning model with mnemonics

Keywords

Problem Based Learning, Mnemonic Methods, Teaching Aids, Mathematical Reasoning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ainun, N. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Madrasah Aliyah Melalui Model Pembelajaran Koopertaif Tipe Teams Games Tournament. Jurnal Peluang. Vol. 4 No. 1, 56. [2] Ardika, Y., & Sardjana, A. (2016). Efektivitas Metode Mnemonic Ditinjau dari Daya Ingat dan Hasil Belajar Matematika Siswa SMK Kelas X. Jurnal Matematika Kreatif-Inovatif, 67. [3] Djamarah, S. B., & Zain, A. (2015). Strategi Belajar Mengajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta. [4] Hasyim, M., & Sudjono, M. E. (2015). Perbandingan Hasil Belajar Matematika Melalui Eksperimentasi Metode Mind Mapping dan Metode Mnemonic Ditinjau dar Tingkat Kemampuan Memori Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Matematika (JP2M), 2. [5] Hendriana, H., & Sumarmo, U. (2017). Penilaian Pembelajaran Matematika. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama. [6] Hendriana, H., Rohaeti, E. E., & Sumarmo, U. (2018). Hard Skills Dan Soft Skills Matematik Siswa. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama. [7] Huda, M. (2017). Model-Model Pengajaran dan Paradigmatis: Isu-isu Metodis dan Paragdimatis. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar. [8] Kadir. (2016). Statistika Terapan: Konsep, Contoh dan Analisis Data dengan Program SPSS/Lisrel dalam Penelitian. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. [9] Lestari dkk, F. (2014). Pengaruh Tehnik Mnemonik Terhadap Hasil Belajar Materi Spermatophyta Siswa Kelas X SMAN 3 Lubuklinggau. Jurnal Perspektif Pendidikan, 13 [10] Mikrayanti. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Suska Journal of Mathematics Education. Vol. 2, No. 2, 99. [11] Murdiyanto , T., & Mahatma, Y. (2014). Pengembangan Alat Peraga Matematika Untuk Meningkatkan Minat Dan Motivasi Belajar Matematika Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Sarwahita Volume 11 No. 1 , 39. [12] Pranata, E. (2016). Implementasi Model Pembelajaran Group Investigation Berbantuan Alat peraga untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemahaman Konsep Matematika. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Indonesia, 35. [13] Riadi, E. (2014). Metode Statistika Parametrik & Nonparametrik. Tangerang: PT. Pustaka Mandiri. [14] Rusman. (2010). Model-model Pembelajaran Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Depok: Rajawali Pers. [15] Siregar, S. (2014). Statistika Deskriptif untuk Penelitian Dilengkapi Perhitungan Manual dan Aplikasi SPSS Versi 17. Jakarta: PT Rajagrafindo Persada. [16] Solso, R., Maclin, O., & Kimberly Maclin, M. (2007). Psikologi Kognitif. Erlangga. [17] Sudirman, N. A., & Ridha, A. A. (2017 ). Efektifitas Keyword Mnemonic Dalam Mempelajari Kosakata . Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi Terapan Vol. 05, No.02 , 227. [18] Sugiyono. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta. [19] Sumartini, T. S. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Penalaran Matematis Siswa Melalui Pembelajaran Berbasis Masalah. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika Vol 5, No. 1, 2. [20] Suwardi, Firmiana, M. E., & Rohayati . (2014). Pengaruh Penggunaan Alat Peraga terhadap Hasil Pembelajaran Matematika pada Anak Usia Dini . Jurnal AL-AZHAR INDONESIA SERI HUMANIORA, Vo. 2, No.4, 299. [21] Syah, M. (2015). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Rajawali Pers. [22] Utami, N. P., Mukhni, & Jazwinarti. (2014). Kemampuan Penalarann Matematis Siswa Kelas XI IPA SMAN 2 Painan melalui Penerapan Pembelajaran Think Pair Square. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika. Vol 3 No. 1, 8. [23] Yamin, M. (2013). Strategi dan Metode dalam Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Referensi (GP Press Group). [24] Zulaikah, S., Sujadi, I., & Kuswardi, Y. (2017). Eksperimentasi Model Pembelajaran Problem Based Learning (PBL) Pada Materi Sistem Persamaan Linier Tiga Variabel Ditinjau Dari Minat Belajar Matematika Siswa. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika (JPMM) Solusi Vol. 1 No.1, 135.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jpiuns.v9i2.75667

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.