Implementation of SQ6R Learning Model to Improve Reading Comprehension of Algorithm on Basic Programming Subjects

Ranu Putra Wiyana, Basori Basori, Agus Efendi

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to improve students' reading comprehension of algorithm on basic programming subjects, especially on basic competence of branch control structure by using SQ6R learning model (Survey, Question, Read, Reflect, Review, Rehash, Rethink, Reevaluate). Research began with identifying problems that occured in the classroom. Then designed an action to overcome it in an action cycle. In this research the administration of action takes place in 2 cycles. Each cycle consists of the stages of planning, implementing, observing, and reflecting. The technique of data collection has been done through reading comprehension test of student and observation of learning activity. Analysis of the data was carried out using quantitative and qualitative analysis. The results showed that the SQ6R learning model can improve students' reading comprehension algorithm. This is indicated by the percentage of completeness of student learning outcomes by 38.9% in pre-cycle, 47.2% in cycle 1 and 83.3% in cycle 2.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anitah, Sri, dkk. (2009). Strategi Pembelajaran di SD. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.

Anni, Chatarina Tri, dkk. (2007). Psikologi Belajar . Semarang: UNNES Press.

Ausubel, D.P., Novak, J.D., & Hanesian, H. . (1986). Educational psychology: A cognitive view. (2nd ed.). New York: Werbel & Peck.

Benny, A. (2009). Model Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta : Dian Rakyat.

Dimyati dan Mudjiono. (2006). Belajar dan Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Erman, S. (2001). Strategi Pembelajaran Matematika Kontemporer. Bandung: JICA UPI.

Gay, L. G. (2006). Educational Research (Competencies for Analysis). USA: Pearson.

Halimah, A. (2015). Auladuna VOL.2. Pengaruh Metode SQ3R Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca Pemahaman, 204-209.

Hamalik, O. (2008). Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran. jakarta: Sinar Grafika.

Herman, H. (2005). Pengembangan Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran Matematika. Malang: Universitas Negeri Malang (UM Pres).

Khagnaninejad, M. S., Saadabadimotlagh, H., & Kowsari, S. (2015). International Journal of English Language and Literature Studies. Examining The Effects Of Strategy-Based Instruction Of Reading Passages To Iranian Undergraduates EFL Learners, 6-8.

Maryono, D., & Pambudi, D. (2014). Pemrograman Dasar. Jakarta: Kemendikbud.

Miarso, Y. H. (2011). Menyemai Benih Teknologi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana.

Munib, Budiono, & Suryono. (2012). Pengantar Ilmu Pendidikan. Semarang: UNNES Press.

Rifa’i, Ahmad dan Anni, Chatarina Tri. (2009). Psikologi Pendidikan. Semarang: UNNES Press.

Rusman. (2011). Model-Model Pembelajaran : Mengembangkan Profesionalisme Guru. Jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Sardiman. (2004). interaksi dan motivasi belajar mengajar. jakarta: PT Raja Grafindo Persada.

Slameto. (1995). Belajar dan Faktor-Faktor Yang Mempengaruhinya. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.

Sudjana, N. (2009). Penilaian Hasil Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya

Suharsimi, A. (2008). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Aksara.

Sumiati dan Asra. (2009). Metode Pembelajaran. Bandung: CV Wacana Prima.

Trianto. (2012). Mendesain Model Pembelajaran Inovatif Progresif. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.

Williams, S. (2010). Grand Valley State University, Allendale, Michigan. Guiding Students Through The Jungle Of Research-Based Literature, 1-4.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/joive.v2i1.35701

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.