Didik Joko Pitoyo, Hunik Sri Runing Sawitri


The purpose of this study was to analyze the influence of meaning in work as intervening variable relationship between transformational leadership and work engagement and analyze the effect of work engagement as pemediasi variable relationship between leader-member exchange and job performance. This study uses a quantitative research methods. While the sample used this study as many as 213 people in the PT Kusumaputra Santosa Karanganyar. The data analysis techniques using multiple linear regression analysis method path.

Results of this study are a) Transformational leadership significant effect on work engagement. b) Transformational leadership and meaning in work significant effect on work engagement. c) meaning in work can be a mediating variable and is expressed as a partial mediating variables (partial mediation). This is because, after entering the variable Meaning in Work, due to the influence of the variable Work Engagement Transformational Leadership which was significantly be remained significant after entering Meaning in Work variables into the regression equation model but declined regression coefficient. d) LMX significant effect on job performance. e) LMX and work engagement significant effect on job performance. f) Work engagement can be a mediating variable and is expressed as a partial mediating variables (partial mediation). This is because, the influence of variables leader member exchange for job performance that was significantly be remained significant after entering work engagement variable into the regression model but declined regression coefficient.

Full Text:



Bass, B.M., B.J. Avolio, D.I. Jung & Y. Berson. 2003. Predicting unit performance by assessing transformational and transactional leadership. Journal of Applied Psychology. Vol. 88, No. 2, pp. 207-218.

Bass, M. Bernard dan Riggio, E. Ronald. 2008. Transformational Leadership. Second Edition. New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc

Bakker, A.B. 2009. Building engagement in the workplace, in Burke, R.J. and Cooper, C.L. (Eds), The Peak Performing Organization, Routledge, Oxon, pp. 50-72.

Bakker, A.B., Albrecht, S.L. and Leiter, M.P. 2011. Key questions regarding work engagement, European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 4-28.

Bakker, A., Demerouti, Evangelia., Xanthoupoulou, Despoina. 2011. How do Engaged Employees Stay Engaged?. Articulo Original Institute of Psychology, Woudestein.

Cohen, J.R. and Single, L.E. 2006. An Examination of The Perceived Impact of Flexible Work Arrangements on Professional Opportunities in Public Accounting. Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 32 No. 4, pp. 317-28

Danim, Sudarman. 2005. Motivasi Kepemimpinan dan Efektivitas Kelompok. Penerbit Rineka Cipta.

Fryer, D., & Payne, R. 1984. Proactive behavior in unemployment : Findings and implication. Leisure Studies, 3, 273-295.

Fryer, D. & Payne, R. 1984. Working definitions. Quality of Working Life, 1(5), p. 13- 15.

Griffin, Ricky W. 2004. Manajemen, alih bahasa Gina Gania. Jakarta : Erlangga

Humphreys, J.H. 2002. Transformational leader behavior, proximity and successful services marketing. Journal of Services Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 6, pp. 487-502.

Ivancevich, et al. 2006. Organisasi, edisi ke tujuh, penterjemah Gina Gania. Jakarta: Erlangga

Kahn, W.A. 1990. Psychological condition of personal engagement and disengagement at work. Academy of Management Journal, 33 (4), 692.

Liang, & Crant. 2010. The Role of Proactive Personality in Job Satisfaction and Organizational Citizenship Behavior: A Relational Perspective. Journal of Applied Psychology 2010, Vol. 95, No. 2, 395–404.

Luthans, Fred. 2006. Perilaku Organisasi, (Alih Bahasa V.A Yuwono, dkk), Edisi Bahasa Indonesia, Yogyakarta: ANDI.

Robbins, Stephen P. 2003. Perilaku Organisasi. Edisi Kesembilan, Jilid 2, Terjemahan PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia, Jakarta

Robinson, D., Perryman, S., & Hayday, S. 2004. The drives of work engagement. Brighton: Institute for Employment Studies.

Rotenberry, P.F., & Moberg, P.J. 2007. “Assessing The Impact of Job Involvement on Performance”. Management Research News, 30, 203-215

Schaufeli, W., & Bakker, A. 2003. UWES (Uterecht Work Engagement Scale). Preliminary Manual. Occupational Health Psychology Unit. Utrecht University .

Schaufeli, W.B., & Salanova, M. 2001. Work engagement: An emerging psychological concept and its implications for organizations. In S.W. Gilliland, D.D. Steiner & D.P. Skarlicki, (Eds.), Research in social issues in management (pp. 135-177). Greenwich, CT: Information Age Publishers.

Stoner, J.A.F. et al. 1996. Manajemen. Jakarta : Prenhalindo

Susetyo, Sri Agus. 2015. Keterkaitan antara kepemimpinan transformasional, makna kerja, karakteristik pengikut dan keterlibatan kerja. Pascasarjana UNS. Jurnal Nasional. Vol. 4. Call of Paper UKSW.

Wang, Hui., Law, S.K., and Wang, D.X. 2001. The lingkage Role of LMX: A Mediating Effect of LMX on the Relationship Leadership and Followers’ Performance and OCB. Departement of Management of Organization. The Hongkong University of Science and Technology. Clear Water Bay, Kowloon.

Yukl, G.A. 2005. Leadership in Organizations, Prentice Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.


  • There are currently no refbacks.