Performance Assessment of Arguing in the Guided Inquiry Learning

Viyanti Viyanti, Cari Cari, Widha Sunarno, Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo, Sri Widhoretno, Fatma Widyastut


The structure of claim argument disputes with the quality in which both are ideal.
However that claim is not always associated with the structure arguments which is noble.
Performance assessment is argued the skills assessment which argues that requiring students
to have the skills to produce arguments. The object of research is to develop performance
assessment instruments which argue on guided inquiry learning. Performance assessment
instruments used to improve students' learning and understanding of the arguments.
Performance assessment instruments developed by the scheme argue argumentation of
Toulmin. This research using descriptive methods. The study population was high school
students of class XI of Bandar Lampung. The Samples are using random cluster sampling
technique for the fourth grade. The results showed that the production of the argument for
the claim using the instrument performance assessment to argue in guided inquiry learning is
18.17%. This result represents that the production of quality argument is "weak" and the
quality of the supported alternative claim and rebuttal backing tends not to be produced.

Full Text:



Berland, L., and B. Reiser. (2009). Making Sense of Argumentation and Explanation. Science


Bacig, T. D., Evans, R. H., Larmouth, D. W., & Risdon, K. C. (1990). Beyond Argumentation

and Comparison/Contrast: Extending the Socrates CAI Design Principles to Classroom

Teaching and The Interpretation and Production of Other Forms of Discourse.

Computers and the Humanities, 24, 15 – 41.

Cavagnetto, A. R. (2010). Argument to Foster Scientific Literacy: A Review of Argument

Interventions in K-12 Science Contexts. Review of Educational Research.

Christenson, Nina & Rundgren, Shu-Nu Chang (2014): A Framework for Teachers’

Assessment of Socioscientific Argumentation: An example using the GMO issue, Journal

of Biological Education

Driver, R., Newton, P., & Osborne, D. (2000). Establishing The Norms of Scientific

Argumentation in Classrooms. Science Education.

Duschl, R. A., Schweingruber, H. A., & Shouse, A. W. (2007). Taking Science to School:

Learning and Teaching Science in Grades K-8. Washington, DC: National Academy


Ford, Michael J. (2012) A Dialogic Account of Sense-Making in Scientific Argumentation

and Reasoning. Journal Cognition and Instruction

Ford, M. J. (2008a). Disciplinary Authority and Accountability in Scientific Practice and

Learning. Science Education.

Hewson, M., & Hewson, P. W. (1983). Effect of Instruction Using Students' Prior

Knowledge And Conceptual Change Strategies on Science Learning. Journal of

Research in Science Teaching.

Jiménex-Aleixandre, M P., Rodríguez, A.B., & Duschl, R. (2000). “Doing The Lesson”

or“Doing Science”: Argument in High School Genetics. Science Education.

Katchevich, D. et al. 2011. Argumentation in The Chemistry Laboratory: Inquiry and

Confirmatory Experiments. Research Sains Education.

Kuhn, D. (2010). Teaching and Learning Science As Argument. Science Education.

Lawson, A.E. (2003). The nature and Development of Hypothetico-Predictive

Argumentation With Implications for Science Teaching. International Journal of

Science Education.

McNeill, K. L., & Krajcik, J. (2008). Inquiry and Scientific Explanations: Helping Students

Use Evidence and Reasoning. In J. Luft, R. Bell, & J. Gess-Newsome (Eds.), Science

as Inquiry in The Secondary Setting (pp. 121–134). Arlington, VA: National Science

Teachers Association Press.

Marttunen, M., & Laurinen L. (2001). Learning of argumentation skills in networked and

face- toface environments. Instructional Science, 29, 127 – 153.

National Research Council. (2012). A Framework for K-12 Science Education:practices,

Crosscutting Concepts, and Core Ideas. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.

Osborne, J., Erduran, S., & Simon, S. (2004a). Enhancing the quality of argumentation in

school science. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

She, H.C. (2004). Fostering “Radical” Conceptual Change Through Dual Situated Learning

Model. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Toulmin, S.E. (1958). The Uses of Argument. Cambridge: University Press.

Wilson, C. D., Taylor, J. A., Kowalski, S. M., & Carlson, J. (2010). The Relative Effects and

Equity of Inquiry-Based and Commonplace Science Teaching on Students’ Knowledge,

Reasoning, and Argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.

Zohar, A., & Nemet, F. (2002). Fostering Students' Knowledge and Argumentation Skills

Through Dilemmas in Human Genetics. Journal of Research in Science Teaching.


  • There are currently no refbacks.