Students’ Expressive Politeness in The Interaction of Bahasa Indonesia Learning Process at MAN Kota Surakarta

Slamet Mulyono

Abstract

The research is aimed at studying about students’ expression politeness speech act function in the
interaction of learning process of Bahasa Indonesia at MAN Kota Surakarta. This research is based
on pragmatics approach using critical discourse analysis. The data is collected by recording
teaching learning process in the classroom by interviewing the key sources and by analyzing other
data artefacts. The result of the research can be concluded as follows: (1) students’ expressive
speech act function in the interaction of learning process of Bahasa Indonesia Subject at MAN
1 Surakarta consists of: (a) thanking, (b) congratulating, (c) complementing, (d) greeting, (e)
sighing, (f) criticizing, and (g) mocking. (2) Students’ expressive speech act function in the
interaction of learning process of Bahasa Indonesia at MAN Kota Surakarta has the most dominant
rate on mocking (50%), while the lowest rate is thanking (1.7%). Mocking gets the highest rate
because students and students’ relationship is very democratic, friendly and intimate. (3) The
politeness aspect of the speech act can be categorized as low level politeness.

Full Text:

PDF

References

Adrienne Lo and Kathryn M. Howard. (2009). Linguistics and Education,

Mobilizing Respect and Politeness in Classroom. Volume 20, 211–216.

Austin. J.L. (1955). How to Do Thing with Words. New York. Oxford University Press.

Buhler, Karl. (1990). Theory of Language: The Representational Function of Language (translated by Donald Fraser Goodwin). Amsterdam. Jhon

Benjamins Publishing Company.

Goetz, Judith Preissle & LeCompte Margareth Dianne. (1984). Enthnography and

Qualitative Design in Educational Research. Orlando. USA. Academic Press,

Inc. Gunarwan. Asim. (2007). Pragmatik: Teori dan Kajian Nusantara. Jakarta.

Universitas Atma Jaya.

Harmer, Jeremy. (1998). The Practice of English Language Teaching. Essex.

Longman Group UK Limited.

Jakobson, Roman. (1960).’Concluding Statement: Lingusitics and Poetics’, dalam

T. Sebeok (ed.). Style in Language.Cambrige. MA: MIT Press. Page 350-377.

Jumanto. (2008). Komunikasi Fatis di Kalangan Penutur Jati Bahasa Inggris.

Semarang. World Pro Publishing.

Mey, Jacob L. (1998). Consie Encyclopedia of Paragmatics. AmsterdamLausanne-

New

York-Oxford-Shannon-Singapore-Tokyo:

Elsevier.

Nakane,Ikuko.(2006).Silence and Politeness

in Intercultural Communication

in. Nunan,

David.

(1991).

Language

Teaching

Methodology,

A

Texbook

for

Teachers.

New

York.

Prentice

Hall.

Spradley,

James.

P.

(1980).

The

Ethnography

Interview.

New

York. Holt. Rinehart and Winston.

Sugiyono.(2010). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif & RND. Bandung, Afabet.

Sutopo, H.B. (2006). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif Dasar Teori dan

Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Surakarta. Unversity Sebelas Maret.

University Seminars. Journal of Pragmatics 38 (2006) 1811–1835.

Yule. (1996). Pragmatics. Oxford. New York. Oxford University Press.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.