Effects of Different Land Status on Conservation Land and Income of Upland Rice Farming in Mausambi Village, Maurole Subdistrict, Ende Regency
Abstract
The objectives of this study were to: (1) analyze the effects of different land tenure status on soil conservation level and (2) analyze the soil conservation level on production and income of upland rice farming. This research was conducted in Mausambi Village, Maurole Subdistrict, Ende Regency. Considerations in choosing a research village were seen from: a) the number of farmers who pawned agricultural land b) the extent of dry land and critical land c) the high percentage of poor farmers d) centers of food crop production and e) areas vulnerable to erosion. The population of upland rice farmers in Mausambi village was 214 people and consisted of 36 sharecroppers, 32 mortgagors and 146 owners. The method of sampling is cluster sampling, where this technique is a technique of selecting a sample from groups, small units or clusters. The sample size was calculated using Parrel formula. The sample size of land ownership status was 92 owners, 34 sharecroppers and 21 mortgagors. The analysis method used was multiple linear regression by including dummy variable of land tenure status and quantitative descriptive analysis. The result of the analysis shows that the farmers on land tenure status of owner are better in doing soil conservation efforts when compared to farmers on land tenure status of sharecropper and mortgagor. Owner dummy variable significantly affected the soil conservation level at 99% significant level. The positive sign means that the soil conservation level score on owner land tenure status is higher than the owner land tenure status of sharecropper and mortgagor. This is because in the owner farmers, the responsibility of soil conservation is higher than the farmers on other land tenure status. The well-done soil conservation efforts provide effect on the production and income of upland rice farming. The result of the research also shows that the land in the research site has not experienced severe erosion and soil conservation has been conducted but not maximized yet, especially on the aspect of contour farming, terrace treatment, terrace-strengthening plants, and tillage.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abas, A., Soelaeman, Y., & Abdurachman, A. 2003. Keragaan dan Dampak Penerapan Sistem Usaha Tani Konservasi terhadap Tingkat Produktivitas Lahan Perbukitan Yogyakarta. Jurnal Litbang Pertanian, 22(2), 49–56. Retrieved from Link
Asafu-Adjaye, J. 2008. Factors Affecting the Adoption of Soil Conservation Measures: A Case Study of Fijian Cane Farmers. Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics, 33, 99–117. Crossref
Bastos, G. S., & Lichtenberg, E. 2001. Priorities in Cost Sharing for Soil and Water Conservation: A Revealed Preference Study. Land Economics, 77(4), 533–547. Crossref
Bishop, J., & Allen, J. 1989. The on-site costs of soil erosion in Mali (English). Environment Department working paper; no. ENV 21. Washington, DC: World Bank. Retrieved from Link
Chang, H.-H., & Boisvert, R. N. 2009. Distinguishing between Whole-Farm vs. Partial-Farm Participation in the Conservation Reserve Program. Land Economics, 85(1), 144–161. Crossref
Chouinard, H. H., Paterson, T., Wandschneider, P. R., & Ohler, A. M. 2008. Will Farmers Trade Profits for Stewardship? Heterogeneous Motivations for Farm Practice Selection. Land Economics, 84(1), 66–82. Crossref
Darmadi, D. E., Mustadjab, M. M., & Purnomo, M. 2014. Pengaruh Tingkat Penerapan Usahatani Konservasi Terhadap Produksi Dan Pendapatan Usahatani Sayuran Di Kecamatan Bumiaji Kota Batu. HABITAT, 24(3), 214–222. Retrieved from Link
de Neergaard, A., Magid, J., & Mertz, O. 2008. Soil erosion from shifting cultivation and other smallholder land use in Sarawak, Malaysia. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 125(1–4), 182–190. Crossref
Fahriyah, Hanani, N., & Sulistyono, A. 2013. Hubungan Tingkat Penerapan Usaha Tani Konservasi Terhadap Produktivitas dan Pendapatan Usahatani Wortel (Daucus Carota L) (Kasus Kecamatan Bumiaji, Kota Batu). Jurnal AGRISE Agricultural Socio-Economics Journal, 13(1), 42. Retrieved from Link
Gardner, R. A. M., & Gerrard, A. J. 2003. Runoff and soil erosion on cultivated rainfed terraces in the Middle Hills of Nepal. Applied Geography, 23(1), 23–45. Crossref
Hettiarachchi, N. D. G., & Gunatilake, H. M. 2000. Factors Affecting the Use of Soil Conservation Measures by Upland Farmers in the Walawe River Watershed. Tropical Agriltural Research, 12, 255–264. Retrieved from Link
Hidayat, K. 2007. Respon Masyarakat Desa Terhadap Pembangunan Pertanian Berkelanjutan. Kasus di Daerah Aliran Sungai Brantas Hulu, Jawa Timur. Program Pascasarjana Universitas Brawijaya. Retrieved from Link
Holden, S. T., Deininger, K., & Ghebru, H. 2009. Impacts of low-cost land certification on investment and productivity. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 91(2), 359–373. Crossref
Katharina, R. 2007. Adopsi sistem pertanian konservasi usahatani kentang di lahan kering dataran tinggi Kecamatan Pangalengan Bandung. Retrieved from Link
Lal, R., & Moldenhauer, W. C. 1987. Effects of soil erosion on crop productivity. Critical Reviews in Plant Sciences, 5(4), 303–367. Crossref
Lichtenberg, E., & Smith-Ramírez, R. 2011. Slippage in conservation cost sharing. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, 93(1), 113–129. Crossref
Lynch, L., & Musser, W. N. 2001. A Relative Efficiency Analysis of Farmland Preservation Programs. Land Economics, 77(4), 577–594. Crossref
Mazvimavi, K., & Twomlow, S. 2009. Socioeconomic and institutional factors influencing adoption of conservation farming by vulnerable households in Zimbabwe. Agricultural Systems, 101(1–2), 20–29. Crossref
Morgan, R. P. C. 2005. Soil Erosion and Conservation, 3rd Edition. Malden, MA 02148-5020, USA: Wiley-Blackwell. Retrieved from Link
Mugniesyah, S. S. M., & Mizuno, K. 2001. Gender, Poverty and Peasant Household Survival Strategies -A Case Study in Dry Land Village in West Java. In Proceeding of the 1st Seminar “Toward Harmonization between Development and Environmental Conservation in Biological Production” (p. 63). Tokyo: Graduate School of Agricultural and Life Sciences The University of Tokyo, JAPAN.
Mustadjab, M. 1994. Alokasi Sumber Daya Pertanian dan Usaha Konservasi Tanah Pada Usahatani Lahan Kering dengan Status Penguasaan Lahan Yang Berbeda. Universitas Padjajaran Bandung.
Nyssen, J., Poesen, J., & Deckers, J. 2009. Land degradation and soil and water conservation in tropical highlands. Soil and Tillage Research, 103(2), 197–202. Crossref
Olarinde, L. O., Oduol, J. B., Binam, J. N., Diagne, A., Njuki, J., & Adekunle, A. A. 2011. Impact of the adoption of soil and water conservation practices on crop production: baseline evidence of the sub Saharan Africa challenge programme. Middle East Journal of Scientific Research, 9(1), 28–40. Retrieved from Link
Pande, V., Kurothe, R., Singh, H. B., & Tiwari, S. P. 2011. Incentives for soil and water conservation on farm in ravines of Gujarat: Policy implications for future adoption. Agricultural Economics Research Review, 24, 109–118. Retrieved from Link
Parel, C. P., Caldito, G. C., Ferrer, P. ., De Guzman, G. G., Sinsioco, C. S., & Tan, R. H. 1973. Sampling Design and Procedures-Papers on survey research methodology. New York: Agricultural Development Council. Retrieved from Link
Pranadji, T. 2004. Strategi Pengembangan Teknologi Usahatani Konservasi Untuk Pembangunan Pedesaan Berkelanjutan. In Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi (Vol. 22, pp. 113–125). Crossref
Sinukaban, N. 2010. Pengelolaan lahan pertanian berbasis pembangunan berkelanjutan. Jurnal Hidrolitan Vol 1, 1(pertanian), 1–9. Retrieved from Link
Stocking, M. A. 2004. Erosion and soil productivity: a review. Norwich, UK. Retrieved from Link
Tiwari, K. R., Sitaula, B. K., Nyborg, I. L. P., & Paudel, G. S. 2008. Determinants of farmers’ adoption of improved soil conservation technology in a Middle Mountain Watershed of Central Nepal. Environmental Management, 42(2), 210–222. Crossref
Wudianto, R. 2009. Mencegah Erosi. Jakarta: Penebar Swadaya.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.