Resolusi Konflik Petani Sekitar Perkebunan Karet melalui Pengembangan Modal Sosial di Desa Kuto Kecamatan Kerjo Kabupaten Karanganyar

D Padmaningrum, Sutarto Sutarto, Agung Wibowo

Abstract

The majority of local population living close to the rubber plantation are farmers. Some of them lived under the proverty line. The management of rubber estate, in fact, ignored local culture. Both situation, the proverty and lack of corporates social responsibility caused intensive conflicts. The objectives of this research  describe: the factors fromulated social capital’s value and the role of social capital in conflict resolution in rubber estate. The constituants of the conflict consist of: the management of rubber estate, internal staff, the local people, local leaders also local and outside traders. This conflict involved: encrochment for agriculture, collecting fire woods illegally and stone mining illegally. In this case, the role of social capital values can described by many activities. The management is required to consider the aspirations of local people and to develop social network between the rubber estate with the local community; in particulary with local leaders; to develope the good exchange with local community, especially funds for social funtions; recruitment of the local people to work in the plantation; supply fresh water; all of which is aplication of the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) of the rubber estate. In the mean time, the local people are requested to participate in the maintenance and sustainability of the rubber estate

Keywords

proverty; conflicts; social capital

Full Text:

PDF

References

Carroll. 2001. Social Capital, Local Capacity Building and Poverty Reduction. The Asian Development Bank. Manila.

Ife, J. 1995. Community Development: Creating Community Alternatives-Vision, Analysis and Practice. Longman. Melbourne.

Jousairi, H. 2006. Social Capital: Menuju Keunggulan Budaya Manusia Indonesia. MR.-United Press. Jakarta.

Lubis. 1999. Pengembangan Investasi Modal Sosial dalam Pembangunan. Antropologi Indonesia. Th XXIII No. 59 Mei-Agustus 1999.

Miles, M.B., dan Huberman, A.M. 1992. Analisis Data Kuantitatif. (Terj. Tjetjep Roehandi Rohidi). Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Mustain. 2005. Gerakan Petani di Pedesaan Jawa Timur: Studi Kasus Gerakan Reclaiming oleh Petani Atas Tanah yang Dikuasai PTPN XII Kalibakar Malang Selatan. Disertasi. Universitas Airlangga. Surabaya.

Nasution. 1988. Metode Penelitian Naturalistik. Tarsito. Bandung.

Popkin, S.L. 1979. The Rational Peasant. The Political Economy of Rural Society in Vietnam. University of California Press. Berkley.

Scott, J.C. 1984. Moral Ekonomi Petani, Pergolakan dan Subsistensi di Asia Tenggara. LP3ES. Jakarta.

Suparjan dan Suyatno, H. 2003. Pengembangan Masyarakat: Dari Pembangunan Sampai Pemberdayaan. Aditya Media. Yogyakarta.

Sutopo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Sebelas Maret University. Surakarta.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.