Evaluasi Kesesuaian Lahan untuk Tanaman Perkebunan di Wilayah Galela, Kabupaten Halmahera Utara, Propinsi Maluku Utara

Tri Mulya Hartati, Bambang Hendro Sunarminto, Makruf Nurudin

Abstract

This study aims to determine land suitability class for of plantation crops, namely, coconut, clove, and cocoa in Galela region, North Halmahera, North Maluku. The determination of land suitability is determined by using the comparison method between the quality of the land on the condition of plant growth, the criteria using two methods, namely Simple Limitation Method (SLM) and Sys Criteria. The result showed the actual land suitability for coconut and clove using SLM system was obtained into two classes, S3 (marginally suitable) and N (unsuitable); whereas the potential land suitability was obtained into three classes i.e S2 (moderately suitable), S3 and N, for cocoa the actual and potential land suitability was obtained into classes N. While,  according to Sys Criteria, the actual land suitability for coconut and clove the obtained two classes i.e. S2 and S3, the potential land suitability for coconut into three classes i.e S1 (very suitable), S2, and S3, for clove into two classes S2, and S3, while for cocoa the actual and potential land suitability was obtained into classes S3. The generally, limiting factors in the cultivation of plantation crops in Galela region, North Halmahera, North Maluku include rooting media, nutrient retention, nutrient availability, erosion hazard, drainage, sodicity, and water availability. The supply of volcanic ash material from Mt. Dokuno positively affect the growth of plantation crops in Galela region. The approach method with Sys Criteria is well suited to determine the suitability of plantation land in the Galela region.

Keywords

Galela; Nutrient availability; Simple limitation method (SLM); Sys criteria

Full Text:

PDF

References

------. 2007. Land Evaluation. Towards a Revised Framework. FAO of the United Nations, Rome, Italy. 107 pp.

Akinci H., Ozalp, A.Y., & Turgut, B. 2013. Agricultural land use suitability analysis using GIS and AHP technique. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture. 97, 71-82.

Arsyad, S. 2010. Konservasi Tanah dan Air. Edisi Kedua. IPB Press. Bogor.

Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian-Kementerian Pertanian. 2011. Petunjuk Teknis Evaluasi Lahan Untuk Komoditas Pertanian. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian, Bogor. 166 hal.

Badan Pusat Statistik. 2015. Maluku Utara Dalam Angka. BPS Propinsi Maluku Utara.

Balai Penelitian Tanah. 2009. Analisis Kimia Tanah, Tanaman, Air dan Pupuk. Petunjuk Teknis Edisi 2. Balai Penelitian Tanah. Bogor.

Dinas Pertanian Halmahera Utara. 2012. Luas Areal dan Produksi Komoditi Tanaman Perkebunan Halmahera Utara.

Direktorat Jenderal Perkebunan. 2014. Luas Areal dan Produksi Tanaman Perkebunan Rakyat Menurut Jenis Tanaman, 2000-2014.

Djaenudin D., Basuni, Hardjowigeno, S., Subagyo, H., Sukardi, M., Ismangun, Marsudi, Suharta, N., Hakim, L., Widagdo, Dai, J., Suwandi, V., Bachri S., & Jordens, E.R. 1994. Kesesuaian Lahan Untuk Tanaman Pertanian dan Tanaman Kehutanan. Laporan Teknis No. 7. Versi 1,0. P.T. Andal Agrikarya Prima. Centre For Soil and Agroclimate Research. Bogor.

Elsheikh, R., Shariff, A.R.B.M., Amiri, F., Ahmad, N.B., Balasundram, S.K., & Soom, M.A.M. 2013. Agriculture Land Suitability Evaluator (ALSE): A Decision and Planning Support Tool for Tropical and Subtropical Crops. Computer and Electronics in Agriculture. 93, 98-110.

FAO. 1976. A Framework for Land Evaluation. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Soil Bulletin 32. FAO, Rome. Italy

He, Y., Yao, Y., Chen, Y., & Ongaro, I. 2011. Regional Land Suitability Assessment for Tree Crops Using Remote Sensing and GIS. Computer Distributed Control and Intelligent Environmental Monitoring (CDCIEM) IEEE, Changsha, pp. 354 – 363.

Kertonegoro, B.D., Suparnawa, S.H., Notohadisuwarno, & Handayani, S. 1998. Panduan Analisis Fisika Tanah. Jurusan Tanah Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta

Martin, D., & Saha, S.K. 2009. Land Evaluation by Integrating Remote Sensing and GIS for Cropping System Analysis in a Watershed. Current Science. 96(4), 569-575.

Mu, Y. 2006. Developing a Suitability Index for Residential Land Use: A Case Study in Dianchi Drainage Area. University of Waterloo, Canada.

Notohadiprawiro, T.R.M. 1985. Selidiki Cepat Ciri Tanah di Lapangan. Cet. I. Penerbit Ghalia Indonesia

Pan, G., & Pan, J. 2012. Research in Crop Land Suitability Analysis Based on GIS. Computer and Computing Technologies in Agriculture. 365, 314-325.

Pemerintah Daerah Kabupaten Halmahera Utara. 2012. Rencana Tata Ruang Wilayah (RTRW) Kabupaten Halmahera Utara Tahun 2012-2032. Peraturan Daerah Kabupaten Halmahera Utara Nomor 09 Tahun 2012.

Prakash, T.N. 2003. Land Suitability Analysis for Agricultural Crops: A Fuzzy Multicriteria Decission Making Approach, Science in Geoinformatics. ITC, Netherlands, pp. 6-13

Rossiter, D.G. 1996. A Theoretical Framework for Land Evaluation. Geoderma, 72, 165-190.

Soil Survey Staff. 2014. Kunci Taksonomi Tanah. Edisi ketiga, 2015. Balai Besar Penelitian dan Pengembangan Sumberdaya Lahan Pertanian, Badan Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pertanian.

Sonneveld, M.P.W., Hack-ten Broeke, M.J.D., Diepen, C.A., & Boogaard, H.L. 2010. Thirty Years of Systematic Land Evaluation in the Netherlands. Geoderma. 156, 84-92.

Sys, I.C., Van Ranst, B., & Debaveye, J. 1991. Land evaluation. Part I. Principles in land evaluation and crop production calculations. International training center for post graduate soil scientists, University Ghent.

Utomo, M., Sudarsono, Rusman, B., Sabrina, T., Lumbanraja, J., & Wawan. 2016. Ilmu Tanah Dasar-dasar dan Pengelolaan. Prenadamedia Group. Jakarta

Wood, S.R., & Dent, F.J. 1983. LECS. A Land Evaluation Computer System Methodology. Bogor: Ministry of Agriculture/PNUD/FAO, Centre for Soil Research, Indonesia

Zonneveld, I.S. 1989. The Land Unit – a Fundamental Concept in Landscape Ecology, and its Applications. Landscape Ecology. 3, 67-86.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.