PRESEPSI MASYARAKAT SAMIN TERHADAP SUBSIDI TUNAI LANGSUNG (STUDI KASUS DI DUKUH TANDURAN DESA KEMANTREN KECAMATAN KEDUNGTUBAN KABUPATEN BLORA)

Dwiningtyas Padmaningrum, Agung WIbowo

Abstract

This research was conducted at Hellmet of Tanduran, Village of Kemantren Sub-district of Kedungtuban, Regency of Blora based of judgement in that region which is still respect the culture value of Samin. This type of research the qualitative descriptive research, by the research strategy of mono case study. Used analysis technique is mono case analysis, in every, case of analysis process, will be conducted by interactive analysis model (data reduction, presented data and verification). The direct cash study is not the appropriate solution to pull destitution out, is seen from varying aspect of human values. From spectacle of justice value, that goverment direct cash subsidy above felt, inequitable and precisely trigger and legitimation the government inequitably to protecting and sheltering the society. Is seen form value of pecification and freshment, the direct cash aid tend to generating to covet at society. Is seen from self-regard value, basically the society have the principle of do not want to be depended. The people have to won spirit/own identification, of the people is believe, suspended meanthat he/she is can not taking care of, the own spirit. The people get the aid, interpreted by the society of Samin that this peoples have to follow the willingness from giving the aids. From the perspective of assess the simple life, its very not possible that the people of Samin hope the aid (the current cash aid) from government The Samin’s moderation society can be seen from profit the Samin’s people that is the life style which is not be soiled wealth, work hard, prayer, fasting and donating, to humanity. But from the perspective of collective value and cooperation, the direct cash aids felt as some think that slackened the togetherness and cooperate. All the program that characterize is subsidy will not be able to hold out to solving the problem and precisely always followed appear the new problem. This case will be impact to cover habit accept, or hope the aid. The direct cash subsidy will give the big share to discolor the situation of Indonesian society culture. Therefore, necessarily, more the aid model “humanizing human being” the aid which is empowering society. The aid is based no the need and local society initiative.

Keywords

Presepsi; Subsidi langsung tunai

Full Text:

PDF

References

Arif, S. 2002. Ekonomi Kerakyatan Indonesia: Mengenang Bung Hatta Bapak Ekonomi Kerakyatan di Indonesia. Muhammadiyah University Press. Surakarta.

Dove, M.R. 1985. Peranan Kebudayaan Tradisional Indonesia Dalam Modernisasi. (Edisi terjemahan oleh Yayasan Obor Indonesia). Jakarta: Yayasan Obor Indonesia.

Haryono. 2004. Program Penanggulangan Kemiskinan di Perkotaan (P2KP) sebagai Alternatif Mengatasi Kemiskinan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Ganesha. Wacana Pembangunan Masyarakat. Vol. 5 No. 10. Sekolah Tinggi Pembangunan Masyarakat Desa. “APMD”. Yogyakarta.

Hikmat, H. 2001. Strategi Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Humaniora Utama Press. Bandung.

Hutomo, S.S. 1996. Tradisi dari Blora. Citra Almamater. Semarang.

Mas’oed, M. 2003. Politik, Birokrasi dan Pembangunan. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Miles, M.B., dan Huberman, A.M. 1992. Analisis Data Kualitatif. (Terj. Tjetjep Rohendi Rohidi). Universitas Indonesia. Jakarta.

Moleong, L.J. 2000. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. PT Remaja Rosdakarya. Bandung.

Mumfangati, T. 2004. Kearifan Lokal di Lingkungan Masyarakat Samin kabupaten Blora Jawa Tengah. Kementerian Kebudayaan dan Pariwisata Deputi Bidang Pelestarian dan Pengembangan Kebudayaan Balai Kajian Sejarah dan Nilai Tradisional Yogyakarta Proyek Pemanfaatan Kebudayaan Daerah.

Natsir, I. 2005. Meski Makan Kurban, BLT Diteruskan. http://www.pikiran-rakyat.com. Diakses Tanggal 12 Mei 2005.

Robbins. 2002. Perilaku Organisasi. PT. Indeks Kelompok Gramedia. Jakarta.

Salim, A. 2001. Teori dan Paradigma Penelitian Sosial: Dari Denzin Guba dan Penerapannya. Tiara Wacana Yogya. Yogyakarta.

Slamet, M. 2003. Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Dalam Ida Yustina dan Adjat Sudrajat (Penyunting). 2003. Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan. IPB Press. Bogor.

Sobur, A. 2003. Psikologi Umum: Dalam Lintasan Sejarah. Pustaka Setia. Bandung.

Sukidin, A.B. 2002. Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Perspektif Mikro. Insan Cendikia. Surabaya.

Sutopo. 2002. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif: Dasar Teori dan Terapannya dalam Penelitian. Sebelas Maret University. Surakarta.

Suwarsono dan Alvin, Y.S. 1991. Perubahan Sosial dan Pembangunan di Indonesia: Teori-teori Modernisasi, Dependensi dan Sistem Dunia. LP3ES. Jakarta.

Usma, S. 2004. Pembangunan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat. Pustaka Pelajar. Yogyakarta.

Wahono, dkk. 2002. Mempertahankan Nilai dari Gesekan Zaman di Kabupaten Kudus dan Pati Jawa Tengah. Dalam Budi Baik Siregar dan Wahono (penyunting). Kembali ke Akar: Kembali ke Konsep Otonomi Masyarakat Asli. Forum Pengembangan Partisipasi Masyarakat. Jakarta.

Yin, R.K. 1987. Case Study research: Design and Methods. Beverly Hills. Sage Publication. California.

Yustina, I., dan Sudrajat, A. 2003. Membentuk Pola Perilaku Manusia Pembangunan. Bogor: IPB Press.

Zuhriyanto. 1988. Kebersamaan Model Samin. Majalah Bringin No. 66 Th. 7. DPD Golongan Karya Jawa Tengah.

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.