Initial Development of the Belief in Chinese Conspiracy Theory Scale in Indonesia
Abstract
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Ahmada, A. B. (2025, April 17). Apa perbedaan penyebutan Tiongkok, Tionghoa, dan Cina? Apakah bermakna sama? Good News From Indonesia. https://www.goodnewsfromindonesia.id/2025/04/17/apa-perbedaan-penyebutan-tiongkok-tionghoa-dan-cina-apakah-bermakna-sama
Alfiyani, L., Setiyadi, N. A., Yakob, A., Mulyono, D., Rohmat, R., & Rizqi, M. F. (2023). An analysis of community satisfaction index on health service quality: CFA and Gap analysis. Jurnal Berita Ilmu Keperawatan, 16(2), 193–202. https://doi.org/10.23917/bik.v16i2.2369
Burhan, O. K., & Sani, J. (2014). Prasangka terhadap Etnis Tionghoa di Kota Medan: Peran identitas nasional dan persepsi ancaman. Psikologia: Jurnal Pemikiran Dan Penelitian Psikologi, 8(1), 25–33. https://doi.org/10.32734/psikologia.v8i1.2562
Chirot, D., & Reid, A. (1997). Essential outsiders: Chinese and Jews in the modern yransformation of Southeast Asia and Central Europe. University of Washington Press. https://www.jstor.org/stable/j.ctvcwnnx9
Dahlan, B. S. S., Othman, A., Ibrahim, M. B. B., & Shohib, M. W. (2024). Validating a model of organizational culture for Pesantren in South Sumatra: A Structural equation modeling approach. Iseedu: Journal of Islamic Educational Thoughts and Practices, 8(2), 144–159. https://doi.org/10.23917/iseedu.v8i2.8455
Douglas, K. M., Uscinski, J. E., Sutton, R. M., Cichocka, A., Nefes, T., Ang, C. S., & Deravi, F. (2019). Understanding Conspiracy Theories. Political Psychology, 40(S1), 3–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12568
Furr, R. M. (2011). Scale construction and psychometrics for social and personality psychology. SAGE Publications Ltd. https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446287866
Golec de Zavala, A., & Cichocka, A. (2012). Collective narcissism and anti-Semitism in Poland. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 15(2), 213–229. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368430211420891
Goretzko, D., Pham, T. T. H., & Bühner, M. (2021). Exploratory factor analysis: Current use, methodological developments and recommendations for good practice. Current Psychology, 40(7), 3510–3521. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-019-00300-2
Huda, M. (2023, Maret 8). Tanggapi isu pertanahan memanas, Kesbangpol DIY ajak warga selesaikan dengan musyawarah. https://jogja.tribunnews.com/2023/03/08/tanggapi-isu-pertanahan-memanas-kesbangpol-diy-ajak-warga-selesaikan-dengan-musyawarah
JASP Team. (2023). JASP (Versi 0.18.1.0) [Perangakat lunak]. https://jasp-stats.org/
Jolley, D., Meleady, R., & Douglas, K. M. (2020). Exposure to intergroup conspiracy theories promotes prejudice which spreads across groups. British Journal of Psychology, 111(1), 17–35. https://doi.org/10.1111/bjop.12385
Kaiser, H. F. (1974). An index of factorial simplicity. Psychometrika, 39(1), 31–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02291575
Lie, S., & Sandel, T. (2020). Unwelcomed guests: Cultural discourse analysis of comments on Ethnic Chinese in Indonesian social media. https://doi.org/10.1163/17932548-12341412
Matsunaga, M. (2010). How to factor-analyze your data right: Do’s, don’ts, and how-to’s. International Journal of Psychological Research, 3(1), 97–110. https://doi.org/10.21500/20112084.854
Murdianto, M. (2018). Stereotip, prasangka dan resistensinya (Studi kasus pada Etnis Madura dan Tionghoa di Indonesia). QALAMUNA: Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial, Dan Agama, 10(02). https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3559267
Nurhamida, Y., Chairunnisak, & Mashuri, F. (2023). Belief in conspiracy and chronic hatred toward China. Dalam Families Mental Health and Challenges in the 21st Century. Routledge.
Putra, I. (2016). Representations and discourse about religion and Chinese descendants in 2012 Jakarta’s election. The Qualitative Report, 21(10), 1799–1816. https://doi.org/10.46743/2160-3715/2016.2518
Ridha, A. R., Kumaidi, K., & Waston, W. (2023). Theoretical construct and development of wasatiyah measurement instruments. Profetika: Jurnal Studi Islam, 24(01), 137–148. https://doi.org/10.23917/profetika.v24i01.1730
Rikardi, A. A. (2024). Faktor-faktor demografi dalam keyakinan konspiratif di Indonesia. Seurune : Jurnal Psikologi Unsyiah, 7(1), 60–73. https://doi.org/10.24815/s-jpu.v7i1.36194
Sudiana, G. N., Ihsan, H., & Nurendah, G. (2020). Kontak antarkelompok dan demografi sebagai prediktor prasangka Etnis Sunda terhadap Etnis Tionghoa. MEDIAPSI, 6(2), 145–156. https://doi.org/10.21776/ub.mps.2020.006.02.8
Susiloadi, P., Renanita, T., & Julaibib, J. (2023). Predicting M-Payment Adoption Intention in Indonesia: Integrating Technology Acceptance Model and Psychological Factors. Indigenous: Jurnal Ilmiah Psikologi, 8(3), 352–367. https://doi.org/10.23917/indigenous.v8i3.2586
Sutton, R. M., & Douglas, K. M. (2022). Agreeing to disagree: Reports of the popularity of Covid-19 conspiracy theories are greatly exaggerated. Psychological Medicine, 1–3. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0033291720002780
Swami, V. (2012). Social psychological origins of conspiracy theories: The case of the Jewish conspiracy theory in Malaysia. Frontiers in Psychology, 3. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2012.00280
Swami, V., Barron, D., Weis, L., Voracek, M., Stieger, S., & Furnham, A. (2017). An examination of the factorial and convergent validity of four measures of conspiracist ideation, with recommendations for researchers. PLOS ONE, 12(2), e0172617. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0172617
Taher, E. (2021, Juni 5). Berapakah jumlah sesungguhnya populasi Tionghoa di Indonesia? National Geographic Indonesia. https://nationalgeographic.grid.id/read/132718811/berapakah-jumlah-sesungguhnya-populasi-tionghoa-di-indonesia
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jip.v10i1.106378
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Suwanda Priyadi, Audi Ahmad Rikardi
We would like to thank the following organizations for their support :
Faculty of Psychology, Universitas Sebelas Maret

This work is licensed under a
Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License
rganiza


1.png)

