Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipequick on The Draw Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan Dan Hasil Belajar Sejarah Siswa Kelas X IIS 5 SMAN 1 Banyudono Boyolali Tahun Ajaran 2015/ 20161

Elfrida Ismi Astari

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to improve students’ participation andlearning outcomes of students in class X IIS 5 SMA Negeri 1 Banyudono Boyolali by applying cooperative learning type of quick on the draw in history subject.

This research is a classroom action research (CAR). The research was conducted in two cycles, with each cycle consisting of a plan, action, observation, and reflection. The subjects were 34 students of class X IIS 5 SMA Negeri 1 Banyudono Boyolali. Data source was derived from the teacher, the students and the learning prosess. Data collection techniques were implemented by interviews, conducting tests, observations, and documentation. Testing the data validity was done by using triangulation method and source. Data analysis was conducted by using comparative descriptive analysis techniques. The research model used was the spiral model (Planning, Acting, Observing, and Reflecting).

The next activity of asking the student in the learning process is also increasing. At the stage of pre-cycle average activities asking students only 64,47%. Then at this stage of the first cycle increased to 76,46%, and at this stage of second cycle increased again to83,33%. Whereas for the history student learning outcomes also increased, it can be seen from the presentage of completeness history student learning outcomes (KKM = 75). At this stage of pre-cycle that scored at least 75 amounted to 70,58% from 34 students or some 24 students. Then at the stage of the first cycle that scored at least 75 increase compared with pre-cycle ie to 76,47% or some 26 students. At this stage of second cycle increased compared to pre-cycle and the first cycle, which scored at least 75 ie to 82,35% or some28 students.

Based on the research findings and discussion, it can be drawn a conclusion that the cooperative learning type of quick on the draw can improve questioning participation and learning outcomes of studying history subject of class X IIS 5 SMA Negeri 1 Banyudono Boyolali.

Keywords

cooperative learning type of quick on the draw,participation, learning outcomes, history learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Abdul Majid. (2013). Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya

Agus Suprijono. (2009). Cooperative Learning Teori dan Aplikasi PAIKEM. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar

Agung, Leo dan Sri Wahyuni. (2013). Perencanaan Pembelajaran Sejarah. Yogyakarta : Ombak

Asep Jihad & Abdul Haris. (2013). Evaluasi Pembelajaran. Yogyakarta: Multi Pressindo

Haris Herdiasyah. (2010). Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Jakarta: Salemba Humanika

Isjoni. (2007). Cooperative Learning: Mengembangkan Kemampuan Belajar Berkelompok. Bandung: Alfabeta

Muhibbin Syah. (2012). Psikologi Belajar. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Paul Ginnis. (2008). Trik dan Taktik Mengajar. Jakarta: Indeks

Rusman. (2013). Model-Model Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada

Suharsimi Arikunto. (2006). Penelitian Tindakan Kelas. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara

Wiji Suwarno. (2006). Dasar-Dasar Ilmu Pendidikan. Jogjakarta: AR-RUZZ MEDIA

Andri Wahayu. 2012. “Penerapan Pembelajaran Kooperatif Tipe Quick On The Draw Untuk Meningkatkan Keaktifan dan Hasil Belajar Matematika (PTK di Kelas VIII Semester Genap SMP Negeri 3 Jatiyoso Tahun 2011/2012)”. Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, Vol 7 No 1

Qaisara, Sadia Batool. 2011. “Effect of Cooperative Learning on Achievement of Studentsin General Science at Secondary Level”. InternationalJournalofEducationandInformationStudies,Vol.3,No.1Tahun 2011

Rosmaini S, Mariani Natalina I, dan Riska Elvandari. 2012. “Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Kooperatif Dengan Strategi Quick On The Draw Untuk Meningkatkan Sikap Ilmiah dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Siswa kelas XI IPA SMA Negeri 2 Kuantan Hilir”.Jurnal Biogenesis, Vol 9 No 1 Tahun 2012

Tan, Van Drat. 2014. “The Effects of Cooperative Learning on the Academic Achievement andKnowledge Retention”. Interntional Journal of Higher Education, Vol 3 No 2 Tahun 2014