PENGARUH MODEL INKUIRI TERBIMBING DIPADU KOOPERATIF JIGSAW TERHADAP KETERAMPILAN PROSES SAINS DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN AKADEMIK

Siti Rokhmatika, Harlita Harlita, Baskoro Adi Prayitno

Abstract

The purposes of this research are to ascertain: 1) the influence of Guided Inquiry combined Cooperative Jigsaw model toward science process skills, 2) the influence of academic ability toward science process skills, 3) the interaction between Guided Inquiry combined Cooperative Jigsaw model and academic ability toward science process skills. The research was quasi experiment research. The research was designed using pretest posttest nonequivalent control group design. Experimental group applied Guided Inquiry combined Cooperative Jigsaw model. Control group applied Conventional model. The populations of this research were all of 10th degree students at SMA Negeri 2 Surakarta in academic year 2011/2012. The samples of this research were the students of X-1 as experiment group and X-3 as control group. The sample of this research was established by cluster random sampling. The data was collected essay test, observation form, and document. The hypotheses analyzed by Anacova. The research concluded that 1) application of Guided Inquiry combined Cooperative Jigsaw model had significant effect toward science process skill, 2) the academic ability didn’t has significant effect toward science process skill, 3) there was not interaction between Guided Inquiry combined Cooperative Jigsaw model and academic ability toward science process skills.

Keywords: Guided Inquiry, Cooperative Jigsaw, Academic Ability, Science Process Skills

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ahmad, Zaheer and Mahmood, Nasir. 2010. Effects of Cooperative Learning vs. Traditional Instruction on Prospective Teachers’ Learning Experience and Achievement, Journal of Faculty of Educational Sciences 43(1):154-164

Ascher, Carol. 1986. Clearing House on Urban Education: Cooperative Learning in the Urban Classroom, Office of Educational Research and Improvement US Departement of Education

Bilgin, I. 2009. The Effects of Guided Inquiry Instruction Incorporating A Cooperative Learning Approach on University Students’ Achievement of Acid and Bases Concepts and Attitude toward Guided Inquiry Instruction, Scientific Research and Essay. 4(10):1039-1046

Carpenter, Jason M. 2006. Effective Teaching Methods for Large Classes, Journal of Family and Consumer Sciences Education 24(2):13-23

Dahniar, N. 2006. Science Projec Sebagai Salah Satu Alternatif dalam Meingkatkan Keterampilan Pross Sains di SMP, Jurnal pendidikan inovatif, 2(1): 35-39

Dirks, Clarissa dan Cunningham, Mtthew. 2006. Enhancing Diversity in Science: Is Teaching Science Process Skills the Answer?, Article Life Science Education 5:218-226

Gillies, R.M. 2006. Teachers and Students Verbal Behavior During Cooperative and Small Group Learning, British Journal Education Psychology.

Hacieminoglu, E., Tuzun, O. Y., and Ertepinar, H. E. 2011. Middle School Students Attitude toward Science in Constructivist Curriculum Environment, International Conference on New Trends in Education and Their Implications, Turkey

Hanse, Martin and Berger, Roland. 2007. Cooperative Learning, Motivational Effects, and Student Characteristics: an Experimental Study Comparing Cooperative Learning and Direct Instruction in 12th Grade Physics Classes, Learning and Instruction 17(1):29-41

Jannah, I. N. 2006. Pengaruh Penerapan Pola PBMP (Pemberdayaan Berpikir Melalui Pertanyaan) dengan Metode Think Pair Share Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir dan Hasil Belajar Siswa Berkemampuan Tinggi dan Rendah pada Pembelajaran IPA Biologi Kelas VII1 SMPN 1 Tumpang Kabupaten Malang. Malang: Skripsi tidak diterbitkan.

Karamustafaoglu, S. 2011. Improving the Science Process Skills Ability of Science Student Teachers Using I Diagram, Eurasian Journal of Physics Chemistry Education 3(1):26-38ducational

Kilic, Durmus. 2008. The Effect of The Jigsaw Technique on Learning The Concepts of The Principles and Methods of Teaching, World Applied Sciences Journal. 4 (3):109-114

Koc, Y., Doymus, K., Karacop, A., and Simsek, U. 2010. the Effects of Two Cooperative Learning Strategies on the Teaching and Learning of the Topics of Chemical Kinetics, Journal of Turkish Science Education 7(2):52-65

Nusbaum et al. 2008. Technology as Small Group Face-to-Face Collaborative Scaffolding, Computer and Education Journal 52(2009):147-153

Prayitno, B. A. 2010. Potensi Pembelajaran Biologi Inkuiri Dipadu Kooperatif dalam Pemberdayaan Berpikir dan Keterampilan Proses Pada Siswa Under Achievment, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Surabaya: UNESA. Tidak

Dipublikasikan

Qodriyah. 2002. Upaya Meningkatkan Motivasi dan Hasil Belajar Biologi Melalui Pembelajaran Kooperatif STAD pada SMU Wahid Hasyim. Tesis Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Santoso, H. 2009. Pengaruh Pembelajaran Inkuiri dan Kooperatif Terhadap Hasil Belajar Kognitif Biologi Pada Siswa SMA, Jurnal Pendidikan Biologi. 1 (1): 15-24

Sengul, Sare and Katranci, Yasemin. 2012. Teaching the Subject Sets with the Dissociation and Re­Association (Jigsaw), International Online Journal of Educational Sciences 4(1):1-18

Slavin, R. E. 1996. Research on Cooperative Learning and Accievement: What We Know, What We Need to Know, Contemporary Educational Psychology, Artcle No. 4: 43-69

Supriono. 2006. Penerapan Metode Pembelajaran Kooperatif Model Jigsaw dalam Pembelajaran Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan, Jurnal Pendidikan Inovatif 2(1):19-23

Tanel, Zafer and Erol, Mustafa. 2008. Effects of Cooperative Learning on Instructing Magnetism: Analysis of an Experimental Teaching Sequence, Phycics Education Journal 2(2):124-136

Thanh, Pham Thi Hong. 2008. Cooperative Learning (CL) and Academic Achievement of Asian Students: A True Story, International education studies 1(3):82-88

Tran, V. D. and Lewis, R. R. 2012. The Effects of Jigsaw Learning on Students Attitudes in a Vietnamese Higher Education Classroom, International Journal of Higher Education 1(2):9-20

Vargas, M.V., Jimenez, J. M., Santamaria, M. L. S, Navarro, J. L. A., and Aviles, G. F. 2011. Cooperative Learning In Virtual Environments: The Jigsaw Method In Statistical Courses, Journal of International Education Research 7(5):1-8

Wang, Tzu Pu. 2007. The Comparison of the Difficulties between Cooperative Learning and

Traditional Teaching Methods in College English Teachers, The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning 3(2):23-30

Wenning, C. J. 2007. Assessing Inquiry Skills As A Component of Scientific Literacy, Journal Physics Teacher Education, 4(2):21-24

Wenning, C. J. 2011. The Levels of Inquiry Models of Science Teaching, Journal of Physics Teacher Education 6(2):9-16

Winarni. 2006. Pengaruh Strategi Pembelajaran Terhadap Pemahaman Konsep IPA Biologi, Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis, danSikap Ilmiah Siswa Kelas V SD dengan Tingkat Kemampuan Akademik Berbeda di Kota Bengkulu. Disertasi Tidak Diterbitkan. Malang: Program Pascasarjana Universitas Negeri Malang.

Wing, chan kam. 2004. Using Jigsaw II in Teacher Education Programmes, Hongkong Teacher’s Centre Journal 3 (1):91-97

Wood, William. B. 2009. Innovations in Teaching Undergraduate Biologi and Why We Need

Them. Department of Molecular, Cellular, and Developmental Biology, University of Colorado,Boulder, Colorado. Juny, 16 (3): 5-6

Yager, R. E. and Akcay, H. 2008. Comparison of Student Learning Outcomes in Middle School Science Classes with an STS Approach and A Typical Textbook Dominated Approach, Research in Middle Education. 31 (7):1-16

Yurdakaban, Irfan. 2011. The Influence OF Peer and Self-Assessment on Learning and Metacognitive Knowledge: Consequential Validity, International Journal on New Trends in Education and Their Implications 2(4):44- 57Irffnternati ona

Zakaria, Effandi and Iksan, Zanaton. 2007. Promoting Cooperative Learning in Science and Mathematics Education: A Malaysian Perspective, Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technologi Education, 2007 3(1):35-39

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.