RESPONS PETANI TERHADAP PROGRAM ASURANSI USAHA TANI PADI (AUTP) DI KECAMATAN ADIMULYO KABUPATEN KEBUMEN
Abstract
This research aims to analyze the responses of farmers to the AUTP program; to analyze the factors affecting farmers’ responses to the AUTP program; and to analyze the influence of factors affecting responses to farmers’responses in the AUTP program. This research was conducted in Adimulyo Subdistrict, Kebumen Regency with the consideration of Adimuluyo Subdistrict is one of the regions that has implemented the AUTP program. This research used quantitative methods and survey technique. The sampling technique used was proportional random sampling. The data sources used were primary and secondary data with methods of observation, interviews, documentation and recording. The analysis method used was multiple linear regression. The results showed that the farmers’ responses to the program from the aspects of understanding, acceptance and implementation of the majority of farmers’responses were in the category of highly disagree with the program. Factors that can influence the responses of the majority were in the very low category, such as formal education, non-formal education, personal experience of rice farming, cultivated land area. Only the age factor was middle-aged, income was low, and mass media access was never. There was a significant influence between the independent variables to the dependent variable in the AUTP program. Independent variables that significantly affected were age (X ), non- formal education (X ), income (X ), personal experience of rice farming (X ), cultivated land area (X ) and mass access (X ). Other variable that didn’t significantly affected the responses of farmers in the AUTP program was formal education (X ).
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Ahmadi, A. 2009. Psikologi Sosial. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Alghifari. 2000. Analisis Regresi: Teori, Kasus, dan Solusi. Yogyakarta: BPFE-Yogyakarta.
Azwar, S. 2013. Sikap Manusia Teori dan Pengukurannya. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.
Badan Pusat Satistik. 2018. Kecamatan Adimulyo dalam Angka. BPS Kecamatan
Ban,V., dan Hawkins. 1999. Penyuluhan Pertanian. Yogyakarta: Kanisius
Budianto, H. 2016. Respon Anggota Kelompok Tani terhadap Program Pengembangan Usaha Agribisnis Perdesaan (PUAP) di Kecamatan Kebun Tebu Kabupaten Lampung Barat. Skripsi. Fakultas Pertanian Universitas Lampung Bandar Lampung.
Dinas Pertanian dan Ketahanan Pangan Kabupaten Kebumen. 2017. Data Luas Lahan yang Diasuransikan Usahatani Padi di Kabupaten Kebumen. Kebumen.
Djunedi, P. 2016. Analisis Asuransi di Indonesia: Konsep, Tantangan dan Prospek. Jurnal Borneo Administrator, 12 (1): 9-27.
Enjolras G, Capitanio F dan Adinolfi F. 2012. The Demand for Crop Insurance: Combined Approaches for France and Italy. Agricultural Economics Review, 5 (13): 1.
Farzaneh M, Allahyari MS, Damalas CA, dan Seidavi A. 2017. Crop insurance as a risk management tool in agriculture: The case of silk farmers in northern Iran. Journal Land Use Policy, 64: 225–232.
Ghozali, I. 2001. Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate dengan program SPSS. Semarang : BP– UNDIP.
Kementrian Pertanian. 2017. Pedoman Bantuan Premi Asuransi Usahatani Padi.
Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Prasarana dan Sarana Pertanian.
Mardikanto, T. 2009. Sistem Penyuluhan Pertanian. Surakarta: UNS Press.
Mulyanti dan Fachrurozi. 2016.Analisis Sikap dan Perilaku Masyarakat terhadap Pelaksanaan Program Bank Sampah (Studi Kasus Masyarakat Kelurahan Bahagia Bekasi Utara). Jurnal Ilmiah Ekonomi Manajemen dan Kewirausahaan “Optimal”, 10 (2) : 185-198.
Novia, AR. 2011. Respon Petani terhadap Kegiatan Sekolah Lapangan Pengelolaan Tanaman Terpadu (SLPTT) di Kecamatan Ajibarang Kabupaten Banyumas. Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Pertanian “Mediagro” 7 (2): 48-60.
Nurhananto DA dan Mutiara F. 2016. Respon Petani Padi terhadap Asuransi Pertanian di Kecamatan Kepanjen Kabupaten Malang. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Pertanian: 454-458. Universitas Tribhuana Tunggadewi Malang.
Pasaribu, SM. 2010. Developing rice farm insurance in Indonesia. Agriculture and Agricultural Science Procedia, 1: 33–41.
Rozalina dan Tusiah. 2015. Faktor-faktor yang Mempengaruhi Respon Petani terhadap Penggunaan Mesin Perontok (Power Thresher) Padi (oryza sativa, L) di Kecamatan Peunaron Kabupaten Aceh Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Agrisamudra, 2(1): 31-40.
Siswandi B dan Syakir F. 2016. Respon Petani erhadap Program Pemerintah Mengenai Asuransi Usahatani Padi (AUTP). Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pembangunan Pertanian: 169-177. Universitas Islam Malang.
Soekartawi. 1988. Analisis Usahatani. Jakarta: UI Press.
Sugiyono. 2013. Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.
Sumaryanto dan A.R Nurmanaf. 2007. Simpul- simpul Strategis Pengembangan Asuransi Pertanian untuk Usaha Tani Padi di Indonesia. Forum Penelitian Agro Ekonomi, 25(2): 89-103.
Suratiyah, K. 2009. Ilmu Usahatani. Depok: Penebar Swadaya.
Tsikirayi CM, Makoni E dan Matiza J. 2013. Analysis of The Uptake of Agricultural Insurance Services by The Agricultural Sector in Zimbabwe. Journal of International Business and Cultural Studies: 1-14.
Wijayanti, A., Subejo dan Harsoyo. 2015. Respons Petani terhadap Inovasi Budidaya dan Pemanfaatan Sorgum di Kecamatan Srandakan Kabupaten Bantul. Jurnal Agro Ekonomi 26 (2):179-191.
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.