Preservation of Goat Kidneys Using Low Concentration Formalin for Human Anatomy Learning

Sindhu Wisesa, Khusnul Muflikhah, Mustofa Mustofa, Fitranto Arjadi

Abstract

Background: Exposure to formaldehyde from a preserved cadaver can cause several health problems in students, lecturers, and laboratory technicians working in medical anatomy laboratories. These conditions include respiratory tract irritation and cancer due to acute and chronic exposure, respectively. Lowering the frequency of contact with formaldehyde from preserved organs helps to ensure the safety of students, lecturers, and laboratory technicians. Therefore, this study aims to determine the effectiveness of low concentration formalin as a preservative solution for goat kidneys. The organ was selected due to its anatomical structure similarity to humans.

Method: Goat kidneys with 50-60 ml of volume were collected, washed, immersed in preservative solution, and stored for two months. The samples were then divided into four groups, which were preserved with different formalin concentrations, namely 30%, 20%, 10%, and 5%. The preservation parameters, namely organ structure and integrity, color, springiness, odor, and mold growth were qualitatively described, while the kidney volume was quantitatively measured.

Results: After the samples were preserved for two months, they were observed, and all groups showed similar characteristics. The kidneys preserved with 5% or 10% formalin showed equal volume before and after two months of preservation.

Conclusion: Low concentration formalin has the same effectiveness in preserving goat kidneys as the high concentration. It also has the potential to be applied in human anatomy learning.

Keywords

cadaver; formaldehyde; goats; kidney

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ghosh SK. Human cadaveric dissection: A historical account from ancient Greece to the modern era. Anat Cell Biol. 2015;48(3):153–69. 2. Brenner E. Human body preservation - old and new techniques. J Anat. 2014;224(3):316–44. 3. Korf HW, Wicht H, Snipes RL, Timmermans JP, Paulsen F, Rune G, et al. The dissection course - necessary and indispensable for teaching anatomy to medical students. Ann Anat. 2008;190(1):16–22. 4. Cahill KC, Ettarh RR. Attitudes to anatomy dissection in an Irish medical school. Clin Anat. 2009;22(3):386–91. 5. Romi MM, Arfian N, Sari DCR. Is Cadaver Still Needed in Medical Education? J Pendidik Kedokt Indones Indones J Med Educ. 2019;8(3):105. 6. Winkelmann A. Anatomical dissection as a teaching method in medical school: A review of the evidence. Med Educ. 2007;41(1):15–22. 7. Triepels CPR, Smeets CFA, Notten KJB, Kruitwagen RFPM, Futterer JJ, Vergeldt TFM, et al. Does three-dimensional anatomy improve student understanding? Clin Anat. 2020;33(1):25–33. 8. Older J. Anatomy: A must for teaching the next generation. Surgeon. 2004;2(2):79–90. 9. Beger O, Karagül Mİ, Koç T, Kayan G, Cengiz A, Yılmaz ŞN, et al. Effects of different cadaver preservation methods on muscles and tendons: a morphometric, biomechanical and histological study. Anat Sci Int. 2020;95(2):174–89. 10. IARC. Chemical agents and related occupations. IARC Monogr Eval Carcinog Risks Hum. 2012;100(Pt F):9–562. 11. NIEHS. Report on Carcinogens, Fifteenth Edition: Formaldehyde. Natl Toxicol Program, Dep Heal Hum Serv. 2021;https://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/ntp/roc/content/profiles. Available from: http://ntp.niehs.nih.gov/go/roc 12. Ohmichi K, Komiyama M, Matsuno Y, Takanashi Y, Miyamoto H, Kadota T, et al. Formaldehyde exposure in a gross anatomy laboratory: Personal exposure level is higher than indoor concentration. Environ Sci Pollut Res. 2006;13(2):120–4. 13. Lakchayapakor K, Watchalayar P. Formaldehyde exposure of medical students and instructors and clinical symptoms during gross anatomy laboratory in Thammasat University. J Med Assoc Thail. 2010;93(SUPPL 7):92–8. 14. Onyije FM, Avwioro OG. Excruciating effect of formaldehyde exposure to students in gross anatomy dissection laboratory. Int J Occup Environ Med. 2012;3(2):92–5. 15. Nielsen GD, Larsen ST, Wolkoff P. Re-evaluation of the WHO (2010) formaldehyde indoor air quality guideline for cancer risk assessment. Arch Toxicol. 2017;91(1):35–61. 16. Mulu A, Tegabu D. Medical students’ attitudinal changes towards cadaver dissection: a longitudinal study. Ethiop J Health Sci [Internet]. 2012;22(1):51–8. 17. Hayashi S, Naito M, Kawata S, Qu N, Hatayama N, Hirai S, et al. History and future of human cadaver preservation for surgical training: from formalin to saturated salt solution method. Anat Sci Int. 2016;91(1):1–7. 18. Vishwakarma SK, Bhavani PG, Bardia A, Abkari A, Murthy GSN, Venkateshwarulu J, et al. Preparation of natural three-dimensional goat kidney scaffold for the development of bioartificial organ. Indian J Nephrol. 2014;24(6):372–5. 19. Fraser KW. Effect of storage in formalin on organ weights of rabbits. New Zeal J Zool. 1985;12(2):169–74.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.13057/smj.v5i2.62820

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.