ANALYSIS OF THE ECOPEDAGOGICAL APPROACH IN GEOGRAPHY LEARNING ON THE LEVEL OF ECOLOGICAL INTELLIGENCE OF ADIWIYATA HIGH SCHOOL STUDENTS IN PEKANBARU

Titis Indriani Santoso, Ernawati Ernawati

Abstract

Geography learning grounded in an ecopedagogical approach plays an important role in fostering students’ ecological intelligence, particularly in the context of contemporary environmental challenges. This study aims to examine the implementation of ecopedagogical approaches in geography learning, analyse students’ levels of ecological intelligence, and investigate the influence of ecopedagogical approaches on students’ ecological intelligence. This research employed a survey method with a mixed-methods sequential explanatory design involving 7 geography teachers and 206 students. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, normality tests, Pearson correlation analysis, and simple linear regression. The results indicate that: (1) the ecopedagogical approach was implemented effectively at a high level (mean scores ranging from 1.88 to 1.95), although the indicators related to the use of the environment as a learning setting (1.90) and as learning materials (1.88) showed the lowest scores; (2) students’ ecological intelligence was also categorized as high (mean scores ranging from 1.59 to 1.98), with relatively lower performance in ecological systems understanding (1.59) and sustainable practice skills (1.86); and (3) correlation analysis revealed a significant positive relationship between ecopedagogical approaches and ecological intelligence (r = 0.430; p < 0.05), with a contribution of 18.5%.

Keywords

ecopedagogical approach; ecological intelligence; geography learning

Full Text:

PDF

References

Akkuzu-Güven, N., & Uyulgan, M. A. (2021). Sub-dimensions of ecological intelligence as predictors of environmental action. Journal of Education in Science, Environment and Health, 7(3), 269–282. https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.960912

Bahrudin, M., Rohmat, D., & Setiawan, I. (2018). The school’s policy in developing students’ ecological intelligence. IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 145, 012045. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/145/1/012045

Berman, J. (2021). Ecopedagogy and education for sustainability: Critical perspectives on environmental education. The Journal of Environmental Education, 52(3), 201–214. https://doi.org/10.1080/00958964.2021.1908224

Bowers, C. A. (2010). Educational Reforms that Foster Ecological Intelligence. Teacher Education Quanterly.

Creswell, J.W. and Creswell, J.D. (2018) Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches. Sage, Los Angeles.

Creswell, J. W. (2011). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantative and Qualitative Research. New Jersey: Pearson Education International.

Facione, P. A. (2011). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. (Research Report). Millbrae, CA: The California Aca-demic Press. http://www.student.uwa.edu.au/_data/assets/pdf_file/0003/1922502/Critical-Thinking-What-it-is-and- why-it-counts.pdf

Goleman, D. (2009). Ecological intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything. Broadway Books.

Kahn, R. (2010). Critical pedagogy, ecoliteracy, and planetary crisis: The ecopedagogy movement. Peter Lang.

Kastolani, W., & Setiawan, I. (2018). Pembelajaran geografi berbasis lingkungan untuk penguatan kecerdasan ekologis. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Geografi, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.

Kurniawan, E., Saputra, Z. S., & Akhyar, M. (2024). Environmental and spatial literacy in geography education: Strengthening sustainability awareness. International Journal of Educational Innovation, 8(1), 45–57. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijei.080105

Misiaszek, G. W. (2016). Ecopedagogy as an element of citizenship education. International Review of Education, 62(5), 587–607. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-016-9587-0

Nur Aulia, N., & Indana, S. (2020). Validitas LKPD pertumbuhan dan perkembangan tumbuhan berbasis guided discovery untuk melatihkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik kelas XII SMA. Berkala Ilmiah Pendidikan Biologi (BioEdu), 9(3), 545–552. https://doi.org/10.26740/bioedu.v9n3.p545-552

Rakuasa, H., & Latue, Y. (2024). Pembelajaran geografi berwawasan lingkungan dalam meningkatkan kesadaran ekologis peserta didik. Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi, 29(1), 45–56.

Sterling, S. (2001). Sustainable education: Re-visioning learning and change. Bristol: Schumacher Briefings.

Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Bandung: Alfabeta.

Sugiyono. (2018). Metode Peneiltian Kuantitatif, Kualitatif dan R&D. In Alfabeta Bandung.

Sugiyono (2019). Metodelogi Penelitian Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dan R&D. Bandung ALFABETA.

Tashakkori, A., & Teddlie, C. (2010). SAGE handbook of mixed methods in social & behavioral research. SAGE Publications, Inc., https://doi.org/10.4135/9781506335193

Taylor, P. W. (Ed.). (1986). Respect for nature: A theory of environmental ethics. Princeton University Press. https://doi.org/10.23943/9781400838530

Yunansah, H., & Herlambang, Y. T. (2017). Pendidikan berbasis ekopedagogik dalam menumbuhkan kesadaran ekologis dan Mengembangkan Karakter Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar, 8(2), 27–36. https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v9i1.6153

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.