Morphology and Facade Study of Umah Pitu Ruang (Case Study: Umah Edet Reje Baluntara in Toweren Village, Aceh Tengah)

Zulfikri Zulfikri, Muhammad Heru Arie Edytia, Elysa Wulandari, Pratitou Arafat, Farisa Sabila

Abstract

Aceh Tengah is home to various tribes, notably the Gayo tribe, known for their unique houses and philosophies with rich historical significance. One such house, Umah Edet Reje Baluntara in the Toweren Uken village, has stood for over a century, bearing historical traces, particularly in its changing morphology over time. This research uses a qualitative descriptive method that consists of two stages, namely collecting secondary data from various online literacies to become the initial basis for describing Umah Edet Reje Baluntara and collecting primary data as field data which is carried out directly at the location of Umah Edet Reje Baluntara by interviewing trusted sources. and observe the object. This data was processed to reconstruct Umah Edet Reje Baluntara by digitizing it using SketchUp Pro 2022 software. Reconstruction via software found several changes in materials and space. These changes are caused by natural factors, family, and time that has passed for a long time. Since this house was built in 1860, the changes in shape that have occurred are in the serule roof elements which have changed to tin roofs, the natural stone ompak foundation has changed to cast concrete, the Titi construction has been lost, elements of the stairs and stair doors are also missing, space the kitchen at the back has been dismantled, the pepir ornaments have been damaged, and many of the lisplang ornaments have been broken.

Keywords

Aceh Tengah; building morphology; facade; Gayo; Umah Pitu Ruang; Umah Edet Reje Baluntara

Full Text:

PDF

References

Beruh, M. I. R. 2018. “Identifikasi Elemen Bentuk Dan Ruang Pada Rumah Tradisional Gayo (Studi Kasus: Umah Pitu Ruang Reje Baluntara Toweren Uken).”

Ifani, Sylviana Mirahayu. 2015. “Kajian Arsitektur Tradisional sebagai Acuan Desain Rumah Tinggal Kontemporer (Studi Kasus: Arsitektur Vernakular Gayo Lut di Kota Takéngën).” Universitas Sumatera Utara. https://repositori.usu.ac.id/handle/123456789/40829.

Iskandar, M Syaom Barliana. 2005. “TRADISIONALITAS DAN MODERNITAS TIPOLOGI ARSITEKTUR MASJID” 32 (2). https://dimensi.petra.ac.id/index.php/ars/article/view/16182.

Iswanto, S., Ramazan, R., & Suryana, N. 2022. The History and Meaning of The Umah Pitu Ruang in Tanah Gayo, Aceh. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 7(2), 138-151. http://jurnaldikbud.kemdikbud.go.id/index.php/jpnk/article/view/3142

Kamarudin, A. P., Adha, S., and Julita, S. 2021. "MENGANGKAT KEARIFAN LOKAL RUMAH RAJA BALUNTARA DI TAKENGON ACEH TENGAH." J-ABDI Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat, 1(2), 115-124. https://www.bajangjournal.com/index.php/J-ABDI/article/view/48

Meleong, Lexy J. 1989. Metologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: PT Remaja Rosdakarya.

Norberg-Schulz, Christian. 1988. Architecture: Meaning and Place: Selected Essays. Architectural Documents. New York: Electa/Rizzoli.

Pinan, A. R. H. A. 2003. Pesona Tanoh Gayo. Pemerintah Kabupaten Aceh Tengah.

Putra, R A, A Zahrah, C Dewi, and Izziah. 2021. “The Influence of Architecture of Umah Pitu Ruang on Gayonese Modern Housing in Takengon.” IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering 1087 (1): 012008. https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899X/1087/1/012008.

Sahputra, Zulhadi, and Muhammad Heru Arie Edytia. 2021. “A COMPARISON STUDY ON ORNAMENT OF RUMOH ACEH IN ACEH BESAR AND UMAH PITU RUANG IN ACEH TENGAH.” Malaysian Journal of Sustainable Environment 8 (1): 1. https://doi.org/10.24191/myse.v8i1.12655.

Salihin, Ansar, Sulaiman Juned, and Dharsono Dharsono. 2019. “MOTIF UKIRAN KERAWANG GAYO PADA RUMAH ADAT GAYO DI KABUPATEN ACEH TENGAH PROVINSI ACEH.” Gorga : Jurnal Seni Rupa 8 (1): 68. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v8i1.12797.

Salwin, Salwin, and Hendra A. 2019. “TIPOLOGI ARSITEKTUR TRADISIONAL GAYO.” Jurnal Arsitekno 1 (1): 14. https://doi.org/10.29103/arj.v1i1.1214.

Sari, Fani Dila, Haria Nanda Pratama, and Indra Setiawan. 2020. “IDENTIFIKASI UMAH ADAT PITU RUANG SEBAGAI PRODUK KEBUDAYAAN GAYO. STUDI KASUS: UMAH REJE BALUNTARA DI ACEH TENGAH.” Gorga : Jurnal Seni Rupa 9 (2): 451. https://doi.org/10.24114/gr.v9i2.22116.

Schefold, Reimar, P. Nas, and Gaudenz Domenig, eds. 2004. Indonesian Houses. Leiden Series on Indonesian Architecture. Singapore: Singapore University Press.

Setianingsih, P., Dafrina, A., and Lisa, N. P. 2017. Analisis Semiotika Simbol pada Umah Pitu Ruang di Kabupaten Aceh Tengah. Temu Ilmiah Ikatan Peneliti Lingkungan Binaan Indonesia (IPLBI), 6, 039-046. https://temuilmiah.iplbi.or.id/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/IPLBI-2017-I-039-046-Analisis-Semiotika-Simbol-pada-Umah-Pitu-Ruang-Di-Kabupaten-Aceh-Tengah.pdf

Snouck Hurgronje, Christiaan, Hatta Hasan Aman Asnah, M. Junus Melalatoa, and Christiaan Snouck Hurgronje. 1996. Gayo: masyarakat dan kebudayaannya awal abad ke-20. Cet. 1. Seri BP 4097. Jakarta: Balai Pustaka.

Syeh Syamsuddin, 64 tahun, Petani, Keturunan Reje Baluntara Generasi ke-4, Desa Toweren Kecamatan Lut Tawar Kabupaten Aceh Tengah, 27 September 2022.

Tammar, M, M ZZ, M.S Kasim, and U Alibasyah. 1996. Seni Rupa Aceh Edisi 2. 2nd ed. Banda Aceh: CV. Sepakat Baru Darussalam.

Widoyoko, Eko Putro. 2014. Teknik Penyusunan Instrumen Penelitian. 1st ed. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar.

Yanti, R. S., Arafat, P., and Wulandari, E. 2023. "Kajian Karakteristik Lanskap Umah Pitu Ruang (UPR) Umah Edet Reje Baluntara di Desa Toweren Uken Kecamatan Lut Tawar Kabupaten Aceh Tengah." Jurnal Lanskap Indonesia, 15(2), 127-135. https://journal.ipb.ac.id/index.php/jli/article/view/44561

Zahrah, A., Dewi, C., Putra, R. A., & Nichols, J. 2021. The Umah Pitu Ruang concept: Environmental adaptation and the Covid-19 pandemic. In IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science (Vol. 881, No. 1, p. 012045). IOP Publishing. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1755-1315/881/1/012045/meta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/arst.v21i2.76551

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.