Email this article 
Manfaat dan Tantangan Penggabungan Pengukuran Objektif dan Subjektif dalam Penelitian Arsitektur
Abstract
Inaccuracy in choosing and using the type of measurement will result in biased research findings. Measurements commonly used in architectural research are objective, subjective, or objective-subjective (mixed) measurements. This article will discuss mixed measures (objective and subjective) in architectural research. Researchers can analyze field data using a quantitative approach, while subjective measurement data are analyzed using a qualitative approach. The results of the interpretation of the two types of measures can show convergence or divergence. This article aims to reveal the benefits and challenges of combining objective and subjective measurements in architectural research, based on systematic literature reviews in scientific journals, which have successfully used objective-subjective measurements and outlines the various benefits and challenges. This study shows that using objective-subjective measures in architectural research can be beneficial if done in an appropriate context.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abowitz, D.A. dan Toole, T.M. (2010), Mixed Method Research: Fundamental Issues of Design Validity and Reliability in Construction Research, Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 136. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)CO.1943-7862.0000026
Ashadi, Anisa, dan Nur’aini, R.D. (2018), Penerapan Metode Kuantitatif dan Kualitatif dalam Penelitian Arsitektur, Penerbit Arsitektur UMJ Press, Jakarta.
Al-Salam, N., Al-Jaberi, A.A. dan Al-Khafaji, A.S. (2021). The analytical psychology of architecture between subjective expression and objective meaning. Civil Engineering Journal, 7, 1557 – 1568. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/cej-2021-03091743
Camerond, R. (2011), Mixed methods in business and management: A call to the first generation, Journal of Management & Organization, 17, 245 – 267. https://doi.org/10.5172/jmo.2011.17.2.245
Capitanio, A. (2019), Attractive Streetscape Making Pedestrians Walk Longer Routes: The Case Of Kunitachi In Tokyo, Journal of Architecture and Urbanism, 43, 131–137.https://doi.org/10.3846/jau.2019.10359
Chakraborty, S., Revez, J., Tidafi, T., & Paoli, G.D. (2004), Archimetrics: A Necessary Discipline for Obtaining Objective Values From Architectural Subjective Values, CAADRIA proceedings.
Chen, Y., Chen, B., Deng, J. dan Xu, S. (2022), The integration model of objective and subjective data of residential indoor environment, Building Simulation, 15, 741–754. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12273-021-0835-2
Cho, J., Lee, J., Kim, W. dan Shin, H. (2020), Comparison of subjective and objective thermal comfort of residuals according to office setting temperature changes, International Journal of Sustainable Building Technology and Urban Development, 11, 258 – 268. https://doi.org/10.22712/susb.20200020
Creswell, J. W. (2016), Research Design, Pendekatan Metode Kualitatif, Kuantitatif, dan Campuran, 4th ed, Pustaka Belajar, Yogyakarta.
Creswell, J. W. & Creswell, J. D. (2018), Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Methods Approaches, Fifth Edition, SAGE Publications, Inc.
Dawadi, S., Shrestha, S. dan Giri, R.A. (2020): Mixed-Methods Research: A Discussion on its Types, Challenges, and Criticisms, Journal of Practical Studies in Education, 2, 25 –36. https://doi.org/10.46809/jpse.v2i2.20
Day, J.K. dan Gunderson, D.E. (2018), Mixed Methods in Built Environment Research, ACD Annual International Conference Proceedings, 54, 255 – 264.
Fadli, M.R. (2021), Memahami desain metode penelitian kualitatif, Humanika, 21, 2579 – 4248.https://doi.org/10.21831/hum.v21i1.38075
Keshtkaran,, R. (2019), Urban landscape: A review of key concepts and main purposes, International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 8, 141 – 168.
Koseoglua, E. dan Ondera, D.E. (2011), Subjective and objective dimensions of spatial legibility, Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 30, 1191 – 1195.https://10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.10.231
Larsona, K.L., Brown, J.A., Jerry, K.J. dan Pearsall, L.H. (2022), Park equity, Why subjective measures matter, Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 76, 127733. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ufug.2022.127733
Leech, N.L dan Onwuebuzie, A.J. (2009), A typology of mixed methods research design, Qualitative Quantitative, 43, 265 – 275. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11135-007-9105-3
Lisboa, J.L.C. dan Maldonado, J.F. (2019), Mixed Research Method, GPH-Journal Of Educational Research, 2, 1 – 7.
Markoviü, S., Stevanoviü, V., Simonoviü, S. dan Stevanov, J. (2016), Subjective experience of architectural objects: A cross-cultural study, Psihologija, 49,149 – 167.
Qiu, W., Li, W., Zhang, Z., Xiaojiang, L., Xun, L. dan Huang, X. (2022), Subjective or objective measures of street environment, which are more effective in explaining housing prices?”, Landscape and Urban Planning, 221, 104358. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2022.104358
Rilatupa, J. (2015), Perkembangan Metode Penelitian Di Bidang Arsitektur Sebuah Kerangka Pemikiran, Seminar Nasional Scan, 6, 297 – 305.
Salehi, K. dan Golafshani, N. (2010), Commentary Using mixed methods in research studies: An opportunity with its challenges, International Journal of Multiple Research Approaches, 4,186 –1 91.
Sayegh, dkk. (2016), Experiencing The Built Environment: Strategies to Measure Objective and Subjective Qualities of Places, Open Geospatial Data, Software and Standards, 1, 11. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40965-016-0013-0
Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104, 333 – 339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039
Sua´rez, L.A.F. (2020), Subjective experience and visual attention to a historic building: A real-world eye-tracking study, Frontiers of Architectural Research, 9, 774 – 804.
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foar.2020.07.006
Zhao, L., Shen, Z., Zhang, Y. dan Sheng, F. (2019), Study on the Impact of the Objective Characteristics and Subjective Perception of the Built Environment on Residents’ Physical Activities in Fuzhou, China, Sustainability, 12, 329. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12010329
