Pengaruh Risk Perception Terhadap Aggressive Driving pada Pengendara Roda Dua di Kota Makassar
Abstract
Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui pengaruh risk perception terhadap perilaku aggressive driving pada pengendara roda dua di Kota Makassar yang melibatkan 953 pengendara roda dua. Instrumen penelitian yang digunakan meliputi skala risk perception yang dikonstruksi oleh peneliti berdasarkan teori risk perception Paul Slovic (1986) yang mengukur dimensi resiko berbahaya dan resiko menakutkan dengan nilai reliabilitas 0.884. selanjutnya skala aggressive driving behavior scale (ADBS) yang dibuat oleh Houston & Harris, terdiri dari 2 aspek yaitu perilaku konflik dan mengebut dengan nilai reliabilitas 0.792. Data dianalisis dengan menggunakan teknik analisis regresi sederhana. Hasil analisis memperlihatkan nilai signifikan (p=<0.05, r=0.042) risk perception mempengaruhi aggressive driving sebesar 4.2%. artinya ada pengaruh signifikan antara risk perception terhadap perilaku aggressive driving pada pengendara roda dua di Kota Makassar.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Azwar.(2017). METODE PENELITIAN PSIKOLOGI. Bandung: Pustaka Pelajar. Adams. (1995). Risk. London: Routledge. AAA. (2019). Safety Driving Advice Aggressive Driving. Diakses dari aaa.com: https://exchange.aaa.com/safety/driving-advice/aggressive-driving/#.YH7xgi8RpQI Balgoun, S. O. (2012). Psychosocial factors influencing aggressive driving among commercial and private automobile drivers in lagos metropolis. The Social Science Journal, 83-89. Bjornskau. (1996). Why are the ‘safest’ norms, attitudes, and types of behavior not typcal for the safest drives? Transport Rev 16, 169-181. Jenekova. (2014). Personal characteristics of aggressive drivers in the perception of drivers and road traffic inspectors. 81-92. Mikulincer & Gillath. (2004). The Multidimentional Driving Style Inventory-Scale Construct and Validation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 323-332. Dollard et al. (1939). Frustation and aggression. 115-120. Fadilah, P. &. (2018). The correlation between perception of accident risk and aggressive driving on teen drivers. 18-29. Greenglass, S. &. (2001). Introduction to special issue on burnout and health. Psychology & Health, 501-510. Griffiths, C. &. (2005). Evaluating Organizational Stress Management Interventions Using Adapted Study Designs. Europan Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 23-41. Hozworth, B. (1961). Social histories of successful and unsuccesfull children. Children development, 135-149. Foundation, A. (2019, April 20). Diakses dari https://exchange.aaa.com/ safety/driving-advice/aggressive-driving/#.YH7siS8RpQI International Labour Office, G. (2016). Psychosocial risk, stress, and violence in the world of work. International Journal of Labour Research, 1-127. Johnson. (1996). Dialectic Between Conceptual and Causal Inquiry in Psychosocial Work-Environment Research. Journal of Occupational Psychology, 362-374. Lanjuen, P. &. (1998). Dimension of driving anger, aggressive, and highway code violations and their mediation by safety orientation in UK drivers. Transportation Research, 107-121. Lichtenstein et.al. (1978). Judge Frequency of Lethal Event. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Learning and Memory, 551-578. Lennon & Watson. (2011). Coping with aggressive driving : driver account how they manage themselves and others to reduce conflict on the road. 1-15. Miller, D. M. (1939). Frustation and aggression. New Heaven: Yale University Press. Mesken et al. (2003). Personal versus situasional factors ini the elictation of anger. Bron, France: ECTRI-FERSI Young Researcher Seminar. Norman, H. &. (2003). The Aggressive Driving Behavior Scale : Developing a Self-Report Measure of Unsafe Driving Practices. 269-278. Pidgeon et.al. (1998). Risk assessment, risk values and the social science programme : why we do need risk perception research. Reliability Engineering and System Safety, 5-15. Royal Society Group. (1983). Risk : analysis, perception and management. London: Royal Society. Sauter. (2002). Occupational Stress and Work-Related Upper Wxtremity Disorders: Concepts and Models. American Journal Of Industrial Medicine, 298-314. Starr. (1969). Social Benefit versus Technological Risk. 1232-1238. Shinar. (1998). Aggressive driving: the contribution of the drivers and the situation. Transportation Research, 137-160. Slovic et.al. (1980). Fact and Fears: Understanding Perceived Risk . Decision Research, 181-214. Slovic. (1987). Perception of Risk. 280-285 Smith & Smith. (2017). Perceptions of Risk Factors for Road Traffic Accidents. 140-146. Tasca. (2000). A Review Of The Literature On Aggressive Driving Research. Taubman et al. (2012). Driving styles and their association with personality and motivation. Accident analysis and prevention , 416-422. Ulleberg & Rundmo. (2003). Personality, attitudes, and risk perception as predictors of risky driving . Safety Science , 427-443. Ulleberg. (2004). Aggressive Driving- a Literature Review. 1-36. Utami. (2010). Hubungan persepsi resiko kecelakaan dengan agggressive driving pengemudi motor remaja . 1-18. Vaughan, H. &. (2005). In Social Psychology. Pearson: Harlow. Walters. (2000). Understanding road rage: Summary of first year project activities. 1-115. Yeihel, B. A. (2012). Driving Style and Their Association with Personality and Motivation. Accident Analysis & Prevention, 416-422.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/wacana.v14i1.56968
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2022 Muhammad Ulil albab Adnan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Jurnal WACANA
Fakultas Psikologi Universitas Sebelas Maret (UNS)
Gedung D Fakultas Psikologi
Jl. Ir. Sutami 36A Kentingan, Jebres, Surakarta Jawa Tengah 57126
email : wacana@mail.uns.ac.id
Phone : 081326277762