Klasterisasi Peran Aktor dalam Wacana Pajak Karbon Indonesia: Analisis Jejaring Wacana pada Media Berita Daring

Ivan Aditya, Rutiana Dwi Wahyunengseh

Sari

Penelitian ini menganalisis klasterisasi peran aktor dalam wacana pajak karbon Indonesia pasca penundaan implementasi dari 2022 ke 2026. Menggunakan pendekatan deskriptif kualitatif dan Discourse Network Analysis, studi ini mengkaji 160 artikel dari Detik, Katadata, dan Kompas. Data dianalisis melalui Discourse Network Analyzer dan visOne. Hasil menunjukkan struktur klaster aktor yang jelas: pemerintah sebagai pusat, klaster pendukung (pemerintah, lembaga riset) yang menekankan keberlanjutan dan insentif ekonomi, serta klaster penentang (industri, sebagian LSM) yang menyoroti biaya dan kesiapan infrastruktur. Temuan menggarisbawahi pentingnya strategi inkremental, koordinasi lintas sektor, dan komunikasi efektif untuk meningkatkan legitimasi dan kesiapan implementasi kebijakan. Penelitian ini berkontribusi pada pemahaman dinamika aktor dalam pembentukan kebijakan pajak karbon di Indonesia.

Kata Kunci

aktor kebijakan; pajak karbon; analisis jejaring wacana; media berita daring

Teks Lengkap:

PDF

Referensi

Andrijasevic, M., Tomic, V.P. dan Jovanovic, V. (2021) “Post-COVID Sustainable Economic Development,” Problemy Ekorozwoju, 16(2), hlm. 58–65. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.35784/pe.2021.2.07.

Belova, A. dkk. (2023) “The more the merrier? Actors and ideas in the evolution of German hydrogen policy discourse,” Energy Research & Social Science, 97, hlm. 102965. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2023.102965.

Černý, O. dan Ocelík, P. (2020) “Incumbents’ Strategies in Media Coverage: A Case of the Czech Coal Policy,” Politics and Governance, 8(2), hlm. 272–285. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2610.

CNBC Indonesia (2022) Pajak Karbon Ditunda Sampai 2025. Tersedia pada: https://www.cnbcindonesia.com/news/20221013175437-4-379582/pajak-karbon-ditunda-sampai-2025 (Diakses: 19 Juli 2023).

Ghinoi, S. dan Steiner, B. (2020) “The Political Debate on Climate Change in Italy: A Discourse Network Analysis,” Politics and Governance, 8(2), hlm. 215–228. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.v8i2.2577.

Kukkonen, A., Ylä-Anttila, T. dan Broadbent, J. (2017) “Advocacy coalitions, beliefs and climate change policy in the United States: Kukkonen, Ylä-Anttila, Broadbent,” Public Administration, 95(3), hlm. 713–729. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1111/padm.12321.

Le Quéré, C. dkk. (2020) “Temporary reduction in daily global CO2 emissions during the COVID-19 forced confinement,” Nature Climate Change, 10(7), hlm. 647–653. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1038/S41558-020-0797-X.

Ortega Díaz, A. dan Gutiérrez, E.C. (2018) “Competing actors in the climate change arena in Mexico: A network analysis,” Journal of Environmental Management, 215, hlm. 239–247. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.03.056.

Purba, A. dkk. (2022) “Community Resilience to Disaster and Climate Change to Support Sustainable Development In and After The Covid-19 Pandemic,” Technium Social Sciences Journal, 33, hlm. 479–491. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.47577/tssj.v33i1.6880.

Rennkamp, B. (2019) “Power, coalitions and institutional change in South African climate policy,” Climate Policy, 19(6), hlm. 756–770. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1080/14693062.2019.1591936.

Stoddart, M.C.J. dkk. (2017) “Media Access and Political Efficacy in the Eco-politics of Climate Change: Canadian National News and Mediated Policy Networks,” Environmental Communication, 11(3), hlm. 386–400. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1080/17524032.2016.1275731.

WEF (2023) The Global Risks Report 2023. World Economic Forum.

Zambrano‐Monserrate, M.A., Ruano, M.A. dan Alcalde, L.A.S. (2020) “Indirect effects of COVID-19 on the environment,” Science of the Total Environment, 728. Tersedia pada: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.138813.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/wp.v6i1.109514

Refbacks

  • Saat ini tidak ada refbacks.