PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PERKARA NARKOTIKA DALAM PUTUSAN 100/PID.SUS/2023/PN. IDI

Khairina Putri Nainggolan, Arsyad Aldyan

Abstract

This article analyzes the legal considerations used by judges in issuing criminal sentences for narcotics cases based on Decision Number 100/Pid.Sus/2023/PN Idi. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the suitability of the judge's considerations in the decision with the suitability regulated in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study uses a normative legal research method with a case study approach, which focuses on the analysis of the suitability of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code as a reference for the evidentiary system in criminal law. Based on the results of the study, it was found that the judge's considerations in deciding narcotics criminal cases were in accordance with the theory of evidence (bewijstheorie) and met the requirements specified in Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The judge considered at least two valid pieces of evidence, namely witness statements, the defendant's statement, and evidence presented at trial. These considerations gave the judge confidence that the defendant was proven to have no right to control Class I narcotics, not plants.

Keywords

Judge's Consideration, Narcotics, Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code

Full Text:

PDF

References

Anugerah, Boy. “Pemberantasan Kejahatan Narkoba Melalui Penerapan UU TPPU Guna Memperkokoh Ketahanan Sosial Masyarakat Indonesia.” Academia.Edu 6, no. 1 (2019). https://www.academia.edu/download/67419258/Pemberantasan_Kejahatan_Narkoba_Melalui_Penerapan_UU_TPPU_LUSOR_Analysis.pdf.

Banjary, S Al. Hitam Putih Polisi Dalam Mengungkap Jaringan Narkoba. Jakarta, 2005. http://library.stik-ptik.ac.id/detail?id=2228&lokasi=lokal.

BNN, Humas. “HANI 2024: Masyarakat Bergerak, Bersama Melawan Narkoba Mewujudkan Indonesia Bersinar.” Https://Bnn.Go.Id/Hani-2024-Masyarakat-Bergerak-Bersama-Melawan-Narkoba-Mewujudkan-Indonesia-Bersinar/, 2024.https://bnn.go.id.

Darmadi, A.A. Sagung Mas Yudiantari. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Menjatuhkan Putusan Pidana Bersyarat.” Jurnal Advokasi 8, no. 2 (2018): 179–91.

Dewi, Sri Dewi Rahayu, and Yulia Monita. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Putusan Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law 1, no. 1 (2021): 125–37. https://doi.org/10.22437/pampas.v1i1.8314.

Gabriella, Sara. “Kerja Sama Indonesia-Interpol Dalam Menangani Isu Penyelundupan Narkoba Di Wilayah Perbatasan Indonesia.” Intermestic: Journal of International Studies 3, no. 2 (2019): 147. https://doi.org/10.24198/intermestic.v3n2.4.

Hamzah, Andi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia, Jakarta. Edited by Tarmizi. Sinar Grafika. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2019.

Harahap, M.Yahya. Pembahasan Permasalahan Dan Penerapan KUHAP. Pemeriksaan Sidang Pengadilan, Banding, Kasasi, Dan Peninjauan Kembali: Edisi Kedua,Sinar Grafika, Jakarta. Edisi Kedua. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2016.

Hiariej, Eddy O.S. Teori & Hukum Pembuktian. Edited by Yayat Sri Hayati. Erlangga, 2012.

Marzuki, Peter Mahmud. Penelitian Hukum. Edisi Revi. KENCANA, 2021.

Nugroho, Bastianto. “Peranan Alat Bukti Dalam Perkara Pidana Dalam Putusan Hakim Menurut Kuhap.” Yuridika 32, no. 1 (2017): 17. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v32i1.4780.

Pratama, M S D, M Yasir, and ... “Pengelolaan Barang Bukti Untuk Keamanan Kasus Tindak Pidana Narkotika Di Wilayah Hukum Polres Tuban (Studi Kasus Di Polres Tuban).” JUSTITIABLE-Jurnal …, 2024. https://ojs.ejournalunigoro.com/index.php/JUSTITIABLE/article/view/966.

Waluyo, Bambang. Penyelesaian Perkara Pidana Penerapan Keadilan Restoratif Dan Transformatif. Edited by Tarmizi. Cetakan Pe. Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2020.

Wibowo, Ari, and Ivan Agung Widyatmoko. “Pertimbangan Hakim Dalam Penjatuhan Pidana Di Bawah Minimum Khusus: Studi Perkara Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” Undang: Jurnal Hukum 4, no. 2 (2021): 345–69. https://doi.org/10.22437/ujh.4.2.345-369.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.98467

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.