ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA TINDAK PIDANA KEFARMASIAN DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 29/PID.SUS/2024/PN SLT

Istizanah Nurlatifah, Dara Pustika Sukma

Abstract

This study aims to analyze whether the judge's considerations in rendering a criminal sentencing decision in the pharmaceutical crime case, Verdict Number: 29/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Slt, comply with the provisions of Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). This study was normative legal research with a prescriptive and applied nature. The approach used in this study was a case study. Primary and secondary legal materials were collected through library research and analyzed using deductive syllogism techniques. Based on the results of research and discussion, it is concluded that the judge's considerations in ruling on the pharmaceutical criminal case in Verdict Number 29/Pid.Sus/2024/PN Slt are in accordance with Article 183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP), as there are four (4) valid pieces of evidence in the case that convinced the judge that the defendant was indeed guilty of distributing pharmaceutical products that did not meet the required standards and must be held accountable for his action.

Keywords

Witness Testimony, Pharmaceutical Crimes, Judges' Considerations

Full Text:

PDF

References

Amin, Rahman. Hukum Pembuktian dalam Perkara Pidana dan Perdata. Yogyakarta: Deepublish Publisher, 2020.

Assyiva', Hanifatuz Zahro. “Pertimbangan Hukum Hakim dalam Tindak PidanaPengedar Obat Keras (Obat G) Jenis Thrihexypenidyl/Holi (Studi Putusan Nomor: 222/Pid.Sus/2020/Pn.Ngw).” Skripsi, Fakultas Syari'ah. UIN Raden Mas Said. Surakarta (2023)

Fitria, Wiza, et al. “Analisis Dakwaan atas Tindak Pidana Mendistribusikan Informasi Elektronik yang Melanggar Kesusilaan di Kejaksaan Negeri Padang.” UNES Law Review 6, no. 1 (2023): 1367 – 1377.

Hasan, Mahri, and Topo Santoso. “Penerapan Alasan Peringan dalam Putusan Pemidanaan Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Rectum 5, no. 2, (2023): 70 - 76. http://dx.doi.org/10.46930/jurnalrectum.v5i2.3180.

Isma, Anggun. “Dasar Pertimbangan Putusan Hakim di Luar Dakwaan Jaksa Penuntut Umum Dalam Tindak Pidana Narkotika.” UNJA: Journal of Legal Studies 1, no. 3, (2023): 190 - 213.

Panjaitan, Putri Alesia Lestari, and Indra Perdana. “Kekuatan Hukum Keterangan Saksi yang Dibacakan di Persidangan Ditinjau dari Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana.” Jurnal Tectum LPPM Universitas Asahan 1, no. 1 (2019): 144 - 150.

Prodjohamidjojo, Martiman. Sistem Pembuktian dan Alat-Alat Bukti. Jakarta: Ghalia Indonesia, 1983.

Purwoleksono, Didik Endro. Hukum Acara Pidana. Surabaya: Airlangga University Press, 2015.

Rasong, Yohanes Don Bosco Ketty, and Hudi Yusuf. “Tindak Pidana Pengedaran Sediaan Farmasi Tanpa Izin Edar dalam Putusan Pidana No.43/ Pid.Sus/ 2022/ PN Pmk.” Jurnal Hukum Bisnis13, no. 3 (2024): 1 - 11. https://doi.org/10.47709/hukumbisnis.v13i03.3856.

Sari, Dina Wininta, Echwan Iriyanto, and Fiska Maulidian Nugroho. “Pertimbangan Hakim dalam Tindak Pidana Pengedaran Sediaan Farmasi Obat Tramadol (Kajian Putusan Nomor 94/Pid.Sus/2021/PN.Tdn).” Jurnal Yudisial 15, no. 1 (2022): 65 - 81.

Sudarmaji, Aji. Hukum Acara Pidana dalam Teori dan Praktik dengan Beberapa Pasal

KUHAP Berdasar Putusan Mahkamah Agung. Malang: CV Literasi Nusantar Abadi, 2022.

Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1981 tentang Hukum Acara Pidana (KUHAP)

Yoisangadji, Iskandar. “Kedudukan Hukum Saksi yang Tidak Hadir di Persidangan sebagai Alat Bukti dalam Pemeriksaan Perkara Pidana.” Justisia 7, no. 14 (2020): 1001 -1036.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.98345

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.