PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MEMERIKSA DAN MEMUTUS PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR: 66/PID.B/2023/PN SKT

Aldi Danuarta Soesanto, Bambang Santoso

Abstract

This article analyzes the judge's considerations in adjudicating the criminal case of assault in Verdict Number 66/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt, which evaluates the evidentiary strength of witness testimony against the defendant Sutiyo Tejo Prabowo, as charged by the public prosecutor. This type of research is normative legal research that is prescriptive and applied in nature, using a case-based approach withprimary and secondary legal materials. The technique for collecting legal materials was conducted through literature studies, followed by an analysis technique using the deductive method. Based on the research findings and discussion, it was shown that the judge's considerations in rendering a verdict in the defendant's criminal assault case in Verdict Number 66/Pid.B/2023/PN Skt were in accordance with Article183 of the Indonesian Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP).

Keywords

Criminal Act of Assault; Evidence; Judical Considerations; Witness testimoni

Full Text:

PDF

References

Andi Hamzah. Pengantar Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia. (Jakarta: Ghana Indonesia,

1985)

Cahyani, N. P. M., Sujana, I. N., & Widyantara, I. M. M. “Visum et Repertum Sebagai Alat

Bukti Dalam Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan”. Jurnal Analogi Hukum. Vol. 3 No. 1

(2021)

Hari Sasangka dan Lily Rosita. Hukum Pembuktian Dalam Perkara Pidana (Bandung:

Mandar Maju, 2003)

Halimah Annisaa Taufiq.“Telataan Pembelaan Terpaksa (Noodweer) dalam Perkara

Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan” Jurnal Verstek Vol 11 No 4 (2022)

Lilik Mulyadi. Hukum Acara Pidana Indonesia (Citra Aditya Bakti: Bandung, 2012) 193

Mukti Aryo. Praktek Perkara Perdata pada Pengadilan Agama (Yogyakarta: Pustaka

Pelajar, 2004)

Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Grup, 2021)

Putra Akbar Saleh. “Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Putusan Hakim yang Mengabaikan Bukti

Keterangan Saksi di Dalam Persidangan”. Lex et Societatis. Vol. 1 No. 1 (2013)

Pramesthi Dyah Sitoresmi. “ Hak Terdakwa Menghadirkan Saksi yang Meringankan (A De

Charge) dalam Persidangan Perkara Penganiyaan”. Jurnal Verstek Vol. 6 No.3

(2017)

Raflenchyo, M., & Rifai, E. “Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Pelaku Tindak Pidana

Penganiayaan yang Mengakibatkan Kematian. ULIL ALBAB” Jurnal Ilmiah

Multidisiplin. Vol. 2 No. 2 (2023)

R Soesilo. Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP). (Bogor: Politea, 1955)

Sabila, S. “Analisis Pertimbangan Hakim Menjatuhkan Putusan Lepas Karena Alasan

Pembelaan Terpaksa Dalam Kasus Penganiayaan”. Jurnal Verstek. Vol. 12 No. 1

(2024)

Siregar, R., & Krisna, R. “Analisis Hukum Kekuatan Pembuktian Ahli Forensik dalam Tindak

Pidana Penganiayaan Berat”. Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research, 3(4),

(2023)

Tirtaamidjaja. Pokok-pokok Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Fasco, 1955)

DOI: https://doi.org/10.20961/jv.v14i1.97851

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.