KONSEP IDEAL DIGITAL EVIDENCE CRYPTOCURRENCY DALAM PERBANDINGAN HUKUM DI INDONESIA, JEPANG, DAN AMERIKA SERIKAT
Abstract
This article analyzes the legal comparison in proving digital evidence for money laundering crimes through virtual currencies (cryptocurrency) in Indonesia, Japan, and the United States. The purpose of this article is to derive an ideal concept from a comparative study of digital evidence in Japan and the United States that can be applied in Indonesia. This research employs normative legal research with a prescriptive nature. The approaches used in this research are the Conceptual Approach and the Comparative Approach. The legal materials utilized consist of primary and secondary sources, gathered through literature study. The analysis of legal materials in this study employs the deductive syllogism method. The findings indicate the need for reform in Indonesia's legal system to handle cryptocurrency digital evidence by adopting best practices from Japan and the United States.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Carol R. Goforth. Regulation of Crypto: Who Is the Securities and Exchange Commission Protecting?. American Business Law Journal ((2021) Available: https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ablj.12192
Courtney J. Linn. Redefining The Bank Secrecy Act: Currency Reporting And The Crime Of Structuring. Santa Clara Law Review (2010): 3
Dezfoli, Farhood Norouzizadeh. Digital Forensic Trends and Future. International journal of Cyber Security and Digital Forensik (IJCSDF) (2013)
Dylan Yaga. Blockchain technology overview: National Institute of Standards and Technology. U.S. Department of Commerce Wilbur L. Ross, Jr., Secretary. (2018) https://doi.org/10.6028/NIST.IR.8202, Ed
FATF, “Virtual Assets and Virtual Asset Service Providers”, https://www.fatfgafi.org/media/fatf/documents/recommendations/UpdatedGuidanceVA-VASP.pdf
Gatteschi, Valentina, dkk. “Technology of Smart Contracts”. The Cambridge Handbook of Smart Contracts, Blockchain Technology and Digital Platforms. (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2019)
Josua Sitompul. Cyberspace Cybercrime Cyberlaw Tinjauan Aspek Hukum Pidana (Jakarta: Tata Nusa, 2012), 270.
Kevin Athallah Lazuardi dan Bambang Santoso. “Koherensi Barang Bukti Elektronik dalam UU ITE dan KUHAP sebagai Pertimbangan Hakim.” Jurnal Verstek. Vol. 12 No. 2. (2024)
Muhammad Ajirifano Sahubawa, Deassy Jacomina Anthoneta Hehanussa, dan Jacob Hattu, “Penipuan Berkedok Investasi Jenis Binary Option,” Pattimura Law Study Review 1, No. 1 (2023): 146–53.
Muhammad Rustamaji dan Faisal. Law Enforcement Strategies Against Money Laundering Through Cryptocurrency: Comparative Studies in Several Countries. (2024)
Pandoe Pramoe Kartika. “Data Elektronik Sebagai Bukti Yang Sah Dalam Pembuktian Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang”. Indonesia Jurnal of Criminal Law (IJoCL) Vol. 19 No. 1 (2019): 33-46
Peraturan Bappebti No. 8 Tahun 2021 jo. Peraturan Bappebti No. 13 Tahun 2022 Tentang Pedoman Penyelenggaraan Perdagangan Pasar Fisik Aset Kripto (Crypto Asset) di Bursa Berjangka
Peter Mahmud Marzuki. Penelitian Hukum (Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2021)
Privacy and Civil Liberties Oversight Board, Report on the Telephone Records Program Conducted under Section 215 of the USA Patriot Act and on the Operations of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (2014)
Sarah N Welling. Money Laundering and The United States Criminal Federal Law. Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Vol. 22 No. 3 (2003): 5
Sinta Lia Latifah dan Kristiyadi. “Tinjauan Efektivitas Penerapan Penggabungan Pembuktian Perkara Tindak Pidana Korupsi dengan Tindak Pidana Pencucian Uang (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1885 K/Pid.Sus/2015).” Jurnal Verstek. Vol. 7 No. 3. (2019)
Yasutake Okano. Virtual Currencies: Issues Remain After Payment Services Act Amanden. (Japan: Financial IT Marketing Department, 2016)
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.










